Scott Rosenberg's Links & Comment

News of Salon, Salon blogs, and the world
Last updated:
2/4/2005; 10:05:17 PM


October 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Sep   Nov


 


Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Scott Rosenberg's Links & Comment" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Scott Rosenberg:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Thursday, October 17, 2002 PERMALINK

$40 billion, but nothing for the shareholders
Dan Gillmor posts about Microsoft's latest financials, pointing out that the company is now sitting on a $40 billion cash hoard. What most companies do when they are making as much money as Microsoft does these days is distribute some of those profits to shareholders in the form of dividends. But like most technology companies, Microsoft has never much believed in dividends. (Technology companies typically see themselves as "growth" companies that need to reinvest all their profits in the business.)

Gillmor says this is because Gates and other key Microsoft owners don't want to deal with the tax implications of dividends given the size of their holdings. Maybe -- I can't say I'm an expert on tax management for billionaires, never having had such worries.

But I also think the Microsoft hoarding instinct is a weird function of the company's ingrained, perpetual paranoia. As numerous insider accounts and much testimony at the antritrust trial have shown, Microsoft's culture imbues employees with the sense that disaster is always around the corner -- if they make one misstep, the competition will eat their lunch. This paranoia is a sort of management tool, to be sure, but it's also an attitude that emanates directly from the company's leadership. Microsoft is hanging on to its $40 billion because, hey, who knows how much money it might need when the next big seismic shift in the technological landscape threatens to unseat its monopoly? Think of that $40 billion as one big Windows replacement fund.
comment [] 5:46:20 PM | permalink


Peace kooks
Michelle Goldberg's Salon cover story yesterday, documenting how some of the biggest protests organized against Bush's Iraqi war plans have been organized by groups on the far-left fringe (Revolutionary Communist Party, supporters of the Shining Path, and so forth), has evoked a blistering response from Toby's Political Diary:
 The reason Goldberg’s article was so bad was that it missed an important story for some ridiculous fluff that even sounded like old fashioned red baiting. The important story is not the reincarnation of the factions of the 1970’s left, but rather the efforts of hundreds of thousands of people to make political sense of their lives by connecting their day to day experience of work and environmental degradation with the larger issue of corporate control and America’s role in the world.

I think a lot of us at Salon would agree that that's an "important story" -- while defending the importance and relevance of Goldberg's article. We'll keep covering both kinds of stories. In the meantime, there are some well-considered comments on Toby's post as well.
comment [] 3:20:56 PM | permalink




© Copyright 2005 Scott Rosenberg. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 2/4/2005; 10:05:17 PM.
Powered by