Eno time: The long and the short of it
I found myself waiting on a long line at Fort Mason Friday night, one that stretched from the doors of the Herbst Pavilion all the way out the Fort Mason parking lot gate. You don't often see a crowd that size at the warren of funky non-profits and arts groups. A man wandered up to the line at one point and asked, a little incredulously, "Are all you people waiting for the Annie Leibovitz exhibit?"
No way. We were waiting to hear Brian Eno, who was giving a free talk to kick off a lecture series by the Long Now Foundation. But the makesift lecture hall proved all too small for the huge crowd, so a lot of people had to listen to the talk piped in over a PA to the bigger room next door. You could mill around and look at Leibovitz's homages to ephemeral celebrity while listening to Eno talk about the value of taking a 10,000 year view.
In the mid-1970s, when Eno's still-amazing solo albums "Here Come the Warm Jets," "Taking Tiger Mountain by Strategy" and "Another Green World" shaped my teenage musical imagination, an Eno lecture might not have filled a small broom closet. So as I waited Friday night -- while distinguished ushers Danny Hillis and Kevin Kelly handed out programs and warned us we might not get in -- a part of me was thinking, who cares if I get in? I'm just glad to live in a time where Brian Eno has found a following, and a place where he is a bigger draw than Annie Leibovitz.
But I've grown a little old for that sort of in-group pride, and besides, the topic of Eno's talk was one that deserves mass distribution beyond the narrow circles of the Bay Area art-and-science-crossover world. If you haven't already encountered the Long Now perspective, this essay by Eno does a pretty good job of recapitulating his Friday talk.
Lit from below just a little demonically, Eno explained the Long Now Foundation's aim of expanding our frame of reference in thinking about the future: What if we were thinking not just about tomorrow or next year or even "the rest of my life," but about the next 10,000 years? (One thing the foundation does in all of its literature is add a zero in front of the year -- for instance, it's 02003 right now -- to "avoid the Y10K bug" and keep that longer time span in the front of our minds.)
As a longtime devourer of science fiction, I'm probably a bit of a pushover for this vision. I remember reading Olaf Stapledon's "Last and First Men" as a 14-year-old and savoring the sense of temporal vertigo its ever-expanding timelines induced.
But there are perfectly pragmatic and down-to-earth rationales for the Long Now idea -- not just in the obvious ways, like fostering a (literally) more conservative treatment of natural resources and the environment, but in personal, psychological terms. While the kind of long-term thinking Long Now promotes certainly encourages activism today, Eno argued that it also "takes the pressure off" individuals -- "it makes you slightly less precious and tight about your own time on earth." Long Now projects, like the clock for which it is most famous, are inevitably collaborations across time between people today and future generations.
Eno outlined four misapprehensions of the Long Now ideal: "The Realist" sneers, "Do you really think you can predict the future?" (They're not trying to predict anything.) "The Pessimist" snaps, ""What bloody future?" ("If he's wrong," Eno argued, "it would have been a good idea id we had done something about it.") "The Optimist" takes a Panglossian, passive approach: "Everything is working out fine," so why do anything? Finally, "The Designer" believes that "we're smart enough to design the future for you -- we can create a perfect world."
Each of these responses misses the basic point here, Eno said -- one of "encouraging a habit of thought": "We are building the future, whether we like it or not. We can do it with our back to it, or we can turn around and look."
For many people, religion provides a moral framework for this long view -- but if, like me, you are simply not a believer in any organized religion's tenets, the Long Now argument makes a great deal of sense. I'll look forward to the rest of this series.
|
