Scott Rosenberg's Links & Comment

News of Salon, Salon blogs, and the world
Last updated:
4/3/2006; 4:22:36 PM


March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Feb   Apr


Salon Blogs:
 


Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Scott Rosenberg's Links & Comment" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Scott Rosenberg:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Tuesday, March 14, 2006 PERMALINK

Other stuff at that was interesting:

Brian Dear of EVDB and Eventful, a site for posting and finding event information, introduced Eventful Demand, which allows people to band together and ask for "speakers" -- musical performers, authors, anyone who might have a fan base or interested crowd -- to come make an appearance, put on a show, give a talk in their area. Dear hopes that creating a common space for this sort of demand-side networking will reduce the reliance on middlemen and allow artists and other "speakers" to connect directly with their audiences. For instance, a band that had a good number of people asking for an appearance in their town could then take that info to a club as evidence of ticket-sales draw -- or, more ambitiously, the "demanders" could organize the event themselves. You've heard of the "wisdom of crowds"; this is more like the "wishlist of crowds." At the moment, the hottest "Demand" on Eventful is for "The impeachment of George W. Bush - Washington metro area." Other than that, an awful lot of people seem to want Wil Wheaton to come to their towns.

Derek Powazek provided an update of the principles he expounded five years ago in his book Design for Community. "Web 1.0"-style communities, were, he said "company towns." As examples, he included Salon's Table Talk, which I think is reasonable; his own Fray.com similarly qualifies. In the "Web 2.0" world, he says, we're more like individual homesteaders, and that gives us potentially much more power and control. He's right, but I think he may, just a little bit, underplay the downside: once you own the house, you're stuck dealing with the insurance and taxes, the leaks, the grafitti and the natural disasters. Still, given the choice, most people -- at least most Americans -- seem to prefer the homeowner model. Derek's slides are here.

Other interesting talks at Etech about community, much-blogged elsewhere, included Clay Shirky's chronicle of "patterns" in online moderation, "Shut Up! No, You Shut Up!" (summary here). Shirky has set up a wiki to record these patterns, modeled on Ward Cunningham's original Pattern Language wiki for software developers.

Meanwhile, Danah Boyd offered a sociological perspective on recent models of successful communities -- Craigslist, Flickr and Myspace. My decade at Salon certainly made this passage ring true:

 Passionate designers are hard to come by. The people in charge of Craigslist, Flickr and MySpace breathe their sites. They don't go home at night and forget about the site. They are online at 4AM because something went wrong. They are talking to users at midnight just because. You cannot force this kind of passion - it's not just a job, it's a belief system.

Unfortunately, it is not clear that even the most passionate people can keep doing it forever. This type of true embeddedness is utterly exhausting. It plays a heavy toll on the lives of the designers. Even in smaller communities, creators grow tired.


comment [] 1:29:13 PM | permalink


I've got some random loose end posts from my time at last week's conference that I really should post before they get any older. Here's one...

Seth Goldstein of Root.net introduced his company's Vaults product, which aims to give individual consumers a place to bank their "attention data." Today you can open a "vault" for free and stash your Amazon purchase history and your general clickstream data (derived from a browser plug-in); tomorrow, presumably, much more. Goldstein talked about "PPAs" ("promises to pay attention") and "attention bonds" and drew a comparison with the way the mortgage industry's adoption of mortgage bonds helped make housing more affordable.

Well, everyone needs a place to live; what problem is Root aiming to solve? The idea seems to be: Companies are already collecting and claiming large amounts of information about our financial lives and online behavior. That's data that we ought, by rights, to control -- and if it's going to be exploited commercially, we should get our slice.

Fair enough. But the Root Vaults idea applies a Wall Street mentality to the "attention economy" concept, and when Goldstein unveiled the Vault home screen before the ETech crowd, it resembled nothing so much as a sort of Bloomberg screen for the mind. There's something potentially dismal about this -- are we going to convert every last remnant and scrap of our earthly existence into the margin-eking terms of financial markets?

On the one hand, I can imagine Root Vaults as offering a nifty way for us all to do what Howard Rheingold long ago advocated -- pay attention to where we're paying attention. On the other hand, I'm wary of letting the bond-trading worldview colonize my choices of entertainment and edification. I'm not looking to become the CEO of my own mind, fiddling with spreadsheet optimizations of my own personal satisfaction.

I mentioned this reaction to Goldstein, and he readily admitted that clickstream data has its limits: "You gotta start somewhere. Is it an accurate representation of a person? No. You don't want to reduce people to data on a Bloomberg dashboard. But this is a natural resource that people are already producing."
comment [] 12:57:10 PM | permalink




© Copyright 2006 Scott Rosenberg. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 4/3/2006; 4:22:37 PM.
Powered by