A blog doesn't need a clever name
Cyberethics, Crypto, Community, Freedom, Privacy, Property, Philosophy, MP3, Online Ed, Copyright, Iran, other current topics and fun stuff
Last updated:
9/25/02; 4:59:26 PM


August 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jul   Sep



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "A blog doesn't need a clever name" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Wednesday, August 28, 2002

The Incredible Tale of LambdaMOO: Learn how one of the first virtual worlds ballooned into a real-life nightmare, by Pavel Curtis the founder of LambdaMOO, still home to more than 150 virtual communities and 8,000 members. Curtis is also the founder of the Web-conferencing company PlaceWare.(Tech TV).
11:28:10 PM    comment []

Simon Fraser U. Committee Rejects Hiring Complaint From Bypassed Technology Critic, by Dan Carnevale, CHE.
[A] Simon Fraser faculty search committee had selected him for the J.S. Woodsworth Chair in the humanities. But after some Simon Fraser administrators opposed the appointment of Mr. Noble, the search was suspended and the university started a new one.

[ . . . ]

There were no grounds, based on the documentation provided by Dr. Noble and the university, to actually hold a hearing, Ms. Aberle [director of media and public relations for Simon Fraser] said. The university is satisfied at this point that Dr. Noble has been treated fairly, and it's time to move on.

But Mr. Noble said Tuesday that he isn't going to stop fighting. This is just the beginning, he said.


10:28:02 PM    comment []

Vie wers question reality TV (BBC News).
Television viewers are becoming increasingly cynical about reality game shows, according to a study.

The viewers have become aware of how contestants "act up", and now look for "moments of truth" that reveal a person's real nature.

Programme makers need to regain their viewers' trust, according to Dr Annette Hill, of the University of Westminster.


7:27:43 PM    comment []

Demography and the West: H alf a billion Americans?
By 2040, perhaps earlier, America will overtake Europe in population.
And it will be a younger, more colorful population, hailing from more corners of the world as well.
The long-term logic of demography seems likely to entrench America's power and to widen existing transatlantic rifts.
[Arts and Letters Daily]
6:27:33 PM    comment []

T H E T W E N E Y R E P O R T : Understanding weblogs

See also my, A vision for the Web at Webster
3:27:06 PM    comment []


A diary of baseball's coming crunch time: Posturing owners! Angry bankers! Scary lawyers! Rats who gnaw the eyes out first! A day by day guide to the last weeks of the labor war. By Keith (the inimitable) Olbermann, in Salon.
2:26:56 PM    comment []

A theme has been established today . . . Intel Chief, in Vietnam, syas everyone should have the right to information. (AP)
1:26:47 PM    comment []

You've Got Dissent! Chinese Dissident Use of the Internet and Beijing's Counter-Strategies, by Michael S. Chase and James C. Mulvenon -- a report of research performed under the auspices of RAND's National Security Research Division. Includes a handy "Appendix: Dissident Web Sites" (all PDF).

(See also this coverage: China Dissidents Thwarted on Net (AP), China reported to crack down on dissent on Internet (Reuters))
1:26:46 PM    comment []


Hacking for Democracy: Shift.com talks to Oxblood Ruffin, founder of Hacktivism, about the ethics of political hacking. by mark moyes. (You can also go directly to page two, or to page three of the interview.) [thanks, politech!]

[A]rticle nineteen of both [the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights] talks about what we call information rights -- the ability to access information, regardless of how that information might be transmitted, whether it's a newspaper on the internet or whatever. It's sort of an umbrella statement that covers all those things. We're specifically interested in maintaining the free flow of what we call lawfully-published content. Information could mean anything, it could mean your bank statements or it could mean kiddie porn or it could mean national security secrets. That's not the information we're talking about. We're essentially talking about any publicly available information on the web, that's available throughout the liberal democracies. So essentially anything we see, we think anybody else should have the right to see as well. Lots of governments disagree with this and that's why they have internet censorship.

[ . . . ]

China aside, one of the greatest threats to liberal democracies is Microsoft itself. . . . . China is really big on virii and the easiest system to exploit in the world is anything Microsoft. So it's almost like a national vulnerability -- as well as some kind of great IT success story. But Microsoft is like, the single, weakest link in the international system.

The Chinese are madly trying to come up with their own operating systems right now, largely as a result of knowing how vulnerable Microsoft is. So it's kind of interesting times, I guess.

[ . . . ]

One of the other things that's important to talk about when you're talking about internet censorship is that most of the time, people just mention the governments involved. Like, "Oh, China = bad, Iran = bad, United Arab Emirates = bad." But it's not as though they're doing this stuff by themselves: They're pretty much almost completely supplied by Western software companies. So when people in the same breath are talking about internet censors in Beijing, I think it's appropriate to mention that they're managing to do this with the help of Oracle, Cisco, Microsoft... You know, all of the major software companies. I'm horrified that these companies are allowed to even do business with them. But they keep claiming that, "We have no business or right to intervene in the internal policies of whatever government, plus we don't even know what they're doing." Which is a big giant lie, anyway.

[ . . . ]

But trust in China or Iran or wherever... You're not going to have this Napster in a trenchcoat running, with everyone secretly trading all kinds of files and information. It's not going to happen that way. You might have a huge network -- we're hoping that the Six/Four network does roll out to a fairly substantial size -- but it's going to operate more like on a cellular level, where there'll be four to five people working in what we're calling an H2H network, hacktivist to hacktivist. They'll all know and trust each other, and can allow each other various permissions.

But it's not going to be like, "Oh, everybody in the world, come use my machine." That's a great way to get yourself caught.

(See also, the Hacktivismo Declaration.)
12:26:38 PM    comment []


User Empowerment and the Fun Factor (Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox, July 7, 2002).
Summary:
Designs that engage and empower users increase their enjoyment and encourage them to explore websites in-depth. Once we achieve ease of use, we'll need additional usability methods to further strengthen joy of use.

4:25:01 AM    comment []

Themes relevant to the technologist / theorist / activist divides as well: Technical versus Public Services: Bridging the Fictional Gap Between "Opposing" Aspects of Librarianship, by Corey A. Harper, in NewBreed Librarian. [The Rogue Librarian]
2:24:42 AM    comment []




© Copyright 2002 Bruce Umbaugh. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 9/25/02; 4:59:26 PM.
Powered by