| September 2002 |
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
| 8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
| 15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
| 22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
| 29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aug Oct |
Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Tuesday, September 03, 2002 |
More from Billboard -- more artists being rewarded to incentivize their
creative efforts: Ronettes
Royalties Case Presses On
The Ronettes -- led by Phil Spector's
then-wife Ronnie Spector -- recorded 28
songs for Spector from 1963 to 1967. Under a
1963 contract, they received a one-time
payment of $14,482. But group members
contend that the contract didn't cover the
royalties for Ronettes songs used in movies,
TV shows, and advertising. The Ronettes' big
hit, "Be My Baby," was featured in the movie
"Dirty Dancing."
9:56:16 PM
|
|
Joel Spolsky writes about Platforms. Makes some really important points, and picks on Groove (with cause, I think). Then, Ray Ozzie replies.
[Joel on Software]
9:21:58 PM
|
|
Dave reports John Robb put together a list of what he calls Professional News Feeds. [Scripting News]
9:15:01 PM
|
|
Zeppelin Denied Copyright For 'Houses Of The Holy' (Billboard)
The Copyright Office says it returned the
copyright to Atlantic because the recording's
registration lists it as a work made for hire.
The album predates the current Copyright Act
of 1976, and therefore falls under the rules of
the Copyright Act of 1909. The earlier law
did not delineate categories of works made for
hire; the Copyright Office's decision was
therefore based solely on the registration
description provided by Atlantic. Categories
of works made for hire were outlined in the
updated 1976 Copyright Act.
[ . . . ]
The surviving members of Led Zeppelin and
the wife of the late John Bonham applied for
the renewal in December 2001. Due to postal
impediments following the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks, the Copyright Office didn't process the
request for renewal for five months, and
issued the judgment May 31.
The story says that the label and Led Zep lawyers are expected to negotiate. Or maybe Mary Bono or Hilary Rosen can fix everything?
8:54:06 PM
|
|
Peter Suber has a nifty weblog on ''free
online scholarship''. It pointed yesterday at a Charlston Advisor
piece, by Donald Beagle, Visualizing
the Digital Commons. Beagle considers the claim of Gene Levy, Provost
at Rice University, that the concept of a ''browseable stack'' as the
essence of a library, still defended by many faculty, is an intellectual
fallacy as the online environment provides better discovery tools and is
more effective than serendipity in the stacks.
I think we must be very careful to distinguish our current crop
of online tools, which remain essentially search-and-retrieval tools, from
true "discovery tools."
1:55:02 PM
|
|
|