A blog doesn't need a clever name
Cyberethics, Crypto, Community, Freedom, Privacy, Property, Philosophy, MP3, Online Ed, Copyright, Iran, other current topics and fun stuff
Last updated:
1/1/03; 2:28:25 AM


December 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Nov   Jan



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "A blog doesn't need a clever name" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Friday, December 27, 2002

Consumer Guide, by Robert Christgau, in the Village Voice. Don't Call It a Comeback
As several e-mailers have noted, I did indeed spend three months listening a lot more than I wrote. Here's where I start catching up.

2:24:13 PM    comment []

More on video on demand: Stewart Alsop, writing in Fortune, tells of his experience with Hollywood 's Latest Flop.
The studio executives would rather not be the next to be Napstered. The problem is that while these people are reasonably bright about how to make and sell movies, they don't know squat about the Internet or personal technology. And so they've come up with something called MovieLink--an attempt by five major studios to create an Internet- based service that lets users rent and download movies to a PC.

I came to MovieLink with thoughts of video-on-demand, one of the long- dreamed-about killer apps for the broadband Internet. The idea behind video-on-demand is that you can sit cuddled up with your remote control in your living room and watch anything you want whenever you want. Feel like seeing Braveheart? Simply punch in a request on your advanced TV, confirm the price, then prepare the popcorn. A digitized version of the movie stored on a server somewhere will pipe the flick to your house and your house only.

Great vision, huh? . . .

. . .

. . . . Video-on-demand? Hardly. In the same time we could have made 20 roundtrips to our neighborhood Blockbuster. Then there's the fact that MovieLink requires you to watch the movie within 24 hours of starting to play it or have it expire. Blockbuster lets you keep a movie for three to four days. Both, however, feature equally unfriendly help. . . .

It's clear that the studios' motivation in designing MovieLink is fear of piracy. But they forgot to make the service usable, appealing, or compelling. So MovieLink will fail, people will argue that you can't sell digital content on the Internet--and the studios will have proved nothing.


11:23:37 AM    comment []



© Copyright 2003 Bruce Umbaugh. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 1/1/03; 2:28:26 AM.
Powered by