Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Monday, December 30, 2002 |
I came across this while looking for something else, from August of 2000, on
the X-Ray Net weblog:
Dig this story about e-book(s) on the next President(s) of the
United States (scroll down at the linked story): Simon and Schuster has
someone writing two bios -- one of Gore, one of Bush -- and will release
one just after midnight following the November election.
How quaint! That was a time when I thought that just after midnight on
election day we would know who had been elected President!
10:55:18 PM
|
|
Like to watch buildings get blown up and fall down? Hey, who doesn't?:
Over the past century, explosive demolition has grown from an
uncommon experimental procedure into an industry that successfully performs
hundreds of projects each year.
However, despite the large number of these events worldwide, the vast
majority of the general public has still never seen an implosion
first-hand. Which is why we developed Implosion Live.
Lots of great video.
10:55:12 PM
|
|
How Long Should Dinner Take? Measuring Expected Meal Duration for
Restaurant Revenue Management (PDF)
The study explores how fast the meal can be before customers feel rushed
and satisfaction decreases. One conclusion is that many restaurants
may be able to significantly shorten dining duration (some 20% in this
study) without compromising customer satisfaction. Furthermore:
If average dining time can be decreased by 20%, the expected
revenue during peak periods can be increased by some 25%. Even if the
restaurant must increase labor costs or incur other expenses, the financial
impact can be considerable.
I would expect, though, that the subjective feeling of ''being
rushed'' reflects factors other than the (objective) duration of the
meal. Which doesn't mean the financial impact can't be considerable,
particularly if duration can be reduced further without reducing
satisfaction, or if satisfaction can be increased while keeping duration
constant.
10:55:08 PM
|
|
A Digression on
Digression, by Douglas L. Howard, in The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Professors and instructors live and die by their lesson plans
-- that daily formulation that is based at least as much on "plan" as it is
upon "lesson." We prepare three or four hours for every one or two that we
lecture and, through some often unusual calculations, we divide knowledge
into time and determine exactly how much information can be transferred
within a given class. If it's Tuesday, it's the Enlightenment; if it's
Friday, it's World War I.
. . .
No matter how hard I try or how much I plan, things still seem to happen in
class that I never expect and cannot predict. Material that seems to
capture students' interest one semester is dull and boring to another
class. Teaching techniques that work in one course fall flat in a different
one. Interruptions take place that always wreak havoc with my schedule.
Students respond differently or raise different issues to the same texts.
Even I am responsible for breaking rank, inasmuch as I make associations in
class that I never factor in during those best-laid plans the previous
evening.
. . .
If I really do want my students to read Updike by the end of the semester,
then I should not allow these distractions to keep them from doing it or to
turn one week on Poe into two. Digression is the enemy of progress.
But either Swift's nightmare has come true and "there is little matter left
for instruction," or I am beginning to believe that diversion does play a
role in the classroom and that "digressions," when properly applied, can
be, in the words of Laurence Sterne, "the sunshine."
10:55:05 PM
|
|
Etymologic: the toughest word
game on the Web.
In this game you'll be presented with 10 randomly selected word
origin or word definition puzzles to solve; in each case the word or phrase
is highlighted in bold, and a number of possible answers will be presented.
You need to choose the correct answer to score a point for that question.
Beware: the false answers will often also seem quite plausible, and some of
the true answers are hard to believe, but we have documentation.
10:54:57 PM
|
|
|