Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Didn't find what you were looking for?
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Sunday, February 09, 2003 |
Smart Mobs is on top of Sociology of the Mobile Phone, in particular Towards a Sociological Theory of the Mobile Phone, by Hans Geser of the University of Zurich. The most general function of cell phones is to lessen the degree to
which social relationships and social systems are anchored in space, and
they increase the degree to which they are anchored in particular persons.
From the point of view of individual users, the cell phone provides
opportunities:
- to enlarge the number of potential communication partners available
at any specific place and moment
- to distance oneself from current collocal interaction fields by
directing attention to remote partners
- to expand the peripheral layers of social relationships by
cultivating weak ties to partners one is not ready to meet
- to shield oneself from new and unpredictable contacts by signaling
unavailability and by maintaining more frequent interaction with
familiar partners (e.g. friends and kin)
- to maintain contact with any other individuals (or organizations)
irrespective of movement and changing spatial locations
- to combine divergent roles which would otherwise necessitate one's
presence at different places at the same time
- to switch rapidly between highly different (and usually segregated)
roles and situational contexts, so that there is more discretion as to
how they should be separated or combined
- to take over “boundary roles” in any social system: e.g. in
order to get information about the external environment or to
participate in processes of external interaction and adaptation
- to fill empty waiting periods with vicarious remote interactions
- to reduce the reliance on one’s own inner judgment by asking
others for advice
- to occupy highly diffuse roles which demand involvement at any hour
of the day (e.g. care-giving functions etc.); or “standby” roles
which demand permanent readiness (e.g. in emergencies)
- to live more "spontaneously": without strictly scheduled
agendas, because meeting hours can easily be rearranged.
From the point of view of social systems the cell phone will:
- decrease the positive impact of spatial proximity on social
interaction and integration
- increase the functional viability of very small groups and single
individuals, because they have increased opportunities to mobilize
additional resources from outside actors, or to include additional
remote members on an ad hoc basis when needed
- ease the penetration of bilateral interpersonal microsystems into
multilateral groupings, formalized social collectivities as well as
public spheres.
- increase the capacity of organizations to fully integrate spatially
remote and moving subunits and to relate to customers whose location
is changing and not known
- increase the functional capacity of collectivities and organizations
on the move: e.g. military or police units, ambulances, refugee groups
etc.
- privilege collectivities constituted on the basis of particular
members rather than particular places or territories (e.g. families
and ethnic groupings rather than cities, parishes or schools)
- encourage emphasis on highly segregated bilateral relationships -
while larger multilateral allegiances are losing ground
- facilitate swiftly constituted, ad hoc gatherings with highly
variable composition, so that social system structures can be flexibly
adapted to rapidly changing situational conditions
- facilitate the shift from rigidly programmed bureaucratic
organizations to "adhocracies" where timetables and
cooperation patterns are constantly reshaped
- lessen the need for central “communication hubs” within groups
and organizations because each member can directly receive (and send
out) his/her own calls
- minimize the “spill over” of communications to unintended third
parties because messages can be precisely targeted to intended
individual receivers
- increase intersystemic permeabilities, blendings and
interpenetrations, while lowering the capacities to keep such contacts
under centralized and regularized control.
3:41:59 PM
|
|
Whoa. Somewhere else needs an integrity injection. Doug blinked and quoted a piece from Plastic on one of the ways the New Hampshire republicans tried to depress democratic turnout:
At least one NH Republican Party official has resigned after news broke that his party paid a Virginia group called GOPMarketplace to hire an Idaho telemarketing firm to jam NH phones on election day. And the plan was to jam all the phones of folks who gave people rides to the polls--not just the Democrats but also the Firefighters Union. According to the usually-pro-Republican Manchester Union Leader the NH GOP paid GOP Marketplace $15,600 to set this up. Democrats, whose phones were jammed for two hours until Verizon managed to block the incoming barrage, say many elderly people missed rides to the polls as a result. GOP Marketplace refuses to comment, but the Idaho telemarketing firm is cooperating with police.
3:33:35 PM
|
|
Three years ago on 'tother blog:
What next?
- some thoughts of mine on the recent
Distributed
Denial of Service attacks
- Smells Like Teen Malcontent by Leander Kahney, and a variety of other
coverage in Wired News.
- Benton headlines, such as "BRAZIL IS TEST CASE FOR FREE WEB ACCESS,"
two stories on iCraveTV (a Canadian company that put live US broadcast
network TV on the Internet), "IN FINLAND, A GLIMPSE OF A FUTURISTIC WEB ON
WIRELESS PHONES," some news from Africa, a Junkbosters report on privacy,
and EPIC preparing to sue Doubleclick.
And two years ago:
- R.I.P, Nobel laureate, Herbert Simon,
- "REALITY SETS IN FOR EMMY
NOMS: Nonfiction p'gramming trophy added to mix," by Michael Schneider,
Variety
- But wait! There's more on reality TV! Public Property
It's real life 'Sims' (simulation game) and you can make
their lives for the better or for the worse, said Grant Bremner,
manager of interactive television at Pearson Television. These people
have been able to give their lives over to the public. If they turn out to
be arrogant and annoying and you want to ruin their lives, fair
enough.
- "Patently Ridiculous Claims," by Rob Pegoraro, in the Wash Post. The
great line is Tim O'Reilly's: As you start to go down that path, you're
turning more and more of human interaction into property.
2:48:48 AM
|
|
|