Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Didn't find what you were looking for?
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Thursday, March 06, 2003 |
Nintendo Case Study: Rules Are Made to Be Broken. An ''E-Mail Marketing Case Study'' by Heidi Anderson, at ClickZ.
How often should you send mailings to your opt-in database?
Conventional wisdom says not too often. Otherwise, you risk overloading
recipients with e-mail. There aren't hard-and-fast rules, but a rule of
thumb many in the industry follow is regular newsletters are typically sent
once every two weeks or monthly. If you sell a product or service via
e-mail, you'll generally send an offer once, maybe twice, with little
follow-up.
. . . . Nintendo . . . found more frequent mailings can be a successful
tactic.
. . .
How does Nintendo manage this without overwhelming its members?
12:06:53 PM
|
|
Keep Out Sign Irresistible Online. Despite one website creator's plea to stay away from his site, people just can't stand not clicking on the Don't Go There button. The site, programmed to go dark after 100 visitors, stayed live just shy of one hour. By Michelle Delio. [Wired News]
6:56:59 AM
|
|
Lexmark: New Fuel for DMCA Foes. Critics of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act say businesses like auto-parts manufacturers and makers of a universal garage-door opener could be affected if Lexmark wins its copyright infringement case against a maker of inexpensive toner cartridges. By Katie Dean. [Wired News]
6:56:26 AM
|
|
Should
Universities Crack Down on File Swapping?: Why They Should
Resist Congress's Call And Fight for Students' Free Speech
Rights, by Julie Hilden, FindLaw's Writ (legal commentary).
In theory, the basic legal doctrines are currently these: Files
as to which the copyright owner has given permission, are always legal to
swap. (For instance, open source software can always be legally swapped;
it's called "open source" precisely because the owner has given up any
legal claim to it.) In addition, some files can also be swapped without the
copyright owner's permission, pursuant to the "fair use" doctrine.
But when exactly, does the "fair use" doctrine apply? That's the difficult
question.
The "fair use" doctrine evolved in a simpler world - in which, say, a book
review could quote part of a book, or a classroom lecturer could photocopy
a small section of a copyrighted work to distribute to his or her students.
Each of these acts is plainly "fair use." But what counts as "fair use"
when it comes to file swapping?
Great piece that teases out some of the conceptual problems in defining
fair use for digital environments and makes a good case for universities'
taking a stand to protect it instead of wimping out as many seem to be doing.
4:04:53 AM
|
|
|