A blog doesn't need a clever name
Cyberethics, Crypto, Community, Freedom, Privacy, Property, Philosophy, MP3, Online Ed, Copyright, Iran, other current topics and fun stuff
Last updated:
11/1/04; 10:33:43 AM


October 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Sep   Nov



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "A blog doesn't need a clever name" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Didn't find what you were looking for?




-
Listed on BlogShares

E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Saturday, October 16, 2004

Jon Stewart for President T-Shirts.

Jon Stewart for President T-Shirts: Now More than Ever. Why? Bruce knows why.

[Learning The Lessons of Nixon]

(Yeah, I'm chomping at the chum again! But you gotta dig the sentiment. That interview totally rocked.)


10:53:38 PM    comment []

What If a Sales Tax Were the Only Tax?. Does replacing personal income and payroll taxes with a national sales tax, an idea President Bush has shown interest in, help the U.S. tax system? By By DANIEL ALTMAN. [The New York Times > Business]
10:52:30 PM    comment []

stories from the not-a-public-domain. We've collected many great stories about the burden of copyright relevant to our case, Kahle v. Ashcroft. You can see them here. Please add more. [Lessig Blog]
10:45:32 AM    comment []

BRUCES ON THE NEW CONFEDERACY. "Bush talks and thinks like Milosevic. He will lose, but the most disheartening thing is the prospect of his religio-nationalist reality-deniers clinging fiercely to the sacred glory of their Lost Cause for the next hundred years. We live under the Confederacy. We're a podunk bunch of swaggering pious hicks."

--Bruce Sterling, via email

[Gibson Blog]


10:45:19 AM    comment []

Stewart: not kidnapped yet. Jon Stewart, attacking the theater that is Crossfire. Crooks and Liars points to a stream here. A bittorrent file is here. [Lessig Blog]
10:41:46 AM    comment []

Transcript of the Stewart appearance on Crossfire. And a discussion on BOP, and a (bing!) BitTorrents of the show in WMV and AVI formats. [Scripting News]
10:41:15 AM    comment []

Jon Stewart: Crossfire "hurting America".

"I think you're a lot more fun on your show," said Tucker Carlson to "Crossfire" guest Jon Stewart this afternoon. "And I think you're as much of a dick on your show as on any other," Stewart shot back. It wasn't the faux avuncularity we've come to expect from Stewart on "The Daily Show" but there, of course, he's playing a role. Here he was himself -- and he wasn't buying any of it.

From the moment Stewart sat down he made no secret of how repugnant he found the show. In fact, he said to Carlson and co-host Paul Begala that he had been so hard on the show he felt it was his duty to come on and say to their faces what he has said to friends and in interviews. What he said was that their show was "hurting America," and he was being only slightly hyperbolic. Stewart told them that when America needed journalists to be journalists they had instead chosen to present theater.

Carlson, trying to affect an air of dry amusement that a comedian would presume to lecture him, important pundit that he is, but looking as if his bow-tie were about to start spinning, could barely contain his outrage. In an absolutely mind-boggling moment, Carlson tried to counter Stewart's criticism by pointing out that during John Kerry's recent appearance on "The Daily Show," Stewart asked the candidate softball questions. "If you want to measure yourself against a comedy show," Stewart said, "be my guest."

Paul Begala tried to put a more conciliatory face on things by pointing out that theirs was a "debate" show. Stewart was having none of it. "I would love to see a real debate show," he said. And went on to tell them that instead of holding politicians' feet to the fire by asking tough question, "you're part of their strategy. You're partisan -- what's the word? -- uh, hacks."

 . . .

"I thought you were going to be funny," Carlson said toward the end of the interview. Stewart responded, "No, I'm not going to be your monkey." And that was what was so bracing.

 . . .

[Salon.com]


10:41:00 AM    comment []

New Approach to Prisoner's Dilemma.

A new strategy for the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma was found to be successful that differs from Robert Axelrod's Tit for Tat strategy. It was introduced by a team from England's Southampton University, who won the 20th-anniversary Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma competition. The difference is that "players" from the same "team" recognize each other and cooperate upon recognizing each other.

Teams could submit multiple strategies, or players, and the Southampton team submitted 60 programs. These, Jennings explained, were all slight variations on a theme and were designed to execute a known series of five to 10 moves by which they could recognize each other. Once two Southampton players recognized each other, they were designed to immediately assume "master and slave" roles -- one would sacrifice itself so the other could win repeatedly.

If the program recognized that another player was not a Southampton entry, it would immediately defect to act as a spoiler for the non-Southampton player. The result is that Southampton had the top three performers -- but also a load of utter failures at the bottom of the table who sacrificed themselves for the good of the team.

Another twist to the game was the addition of noise, which allowed some moves to be deliberately misrepresented. In the original game, the two prisoners could not communicate. But Southampton's design lets the prisoners do the equivalent of signaling to each other their intentions by tapping in Morse code on the prison wall.

Kendall noted that there was nothing in the competition rules to preclude such a strategy, though he admitted that the ability to submit multiple players means it's difficult to tell whether this strategy would really beat Tit for Tat in the original version. But he believes it would be impossible to prevent collusion between entrants.

[via Wired News]

[Smart Mobs]


10:34:55 AM    comment []

Press Freedom on the Precipice. Reporters being imprisoned merely for doing their jobs is something that should worry everyone who cherishes the First Amendment. [The New York Times > Opinion]
7:47:57 AM    comment []

Dell backs spyware education drive. PC maker and nonprofit partner aim to spread word about spyware--which most American PC owners don't know how to fix, they say. [CNET News.com]
7:45:51 AM    comment []



© Copyright 2004 Bruce Umbaugh. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 11/1/04; 10:33:55 AM.
Powered by
(-- £ Salon Bloggers & --)