Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Didn't find what you were looking for?
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Wednesday, December 08, 2004 |
Holidays are good time to bond, buy a bunch of stuff. "Buy Nothing Day," has come and gone, without making much of a dent on post-Thanksgiving consumerism. But while the people over at Adbusters, the organizers of the Nov. 26 holiday, haven't hurt any corporate giants, they have hit a chord with college students and professors who feel the mall is a haven for evil. [The Journal]
10:24:42 PM
|
|
I wasn't even going to note this, 'cause it just seemed like same ol' same ol', but Wes' insightful remark made me rethink:
CNet: DVD Copy Control Association sues DVD jukebox maker Kaleidescape. They appear to be using a slippery-slope theory: if they allow the $27K Kaleidescape then they have to allow the $1K Molino (whose Web site is strangely empty...) and then the $100 Microsoft Media Center 2006. [Hack the Planet]
10:12:31 PM
|
|
MORE BCS. Regardless of whether Auburn or Oklahoma deserves to face USC in the college football championship bowl game, I don't think that there would be much of a possibility that college football would change to a playoff format anytime soon. The... [Begging To Differ]
Here's the thing about the BCS-versus-playoffs wrangling: moving to some N-team playoffs arrangement can't possibly be a cureall, since the "right" number of teams to battle it out given any actual season us inlikely to be N, rather than either N+1 or N-1. It seems to me rather regular that there are three teams with a legit claim to battle it out for "all the marbles" (which are what exactly?), but rarely four. What year have folks been clamoring over how the numbers five and six teams are excluded?
So, first, whatever N teams -- four, eight, sixteen -- only moves the argument about which teams get included from an argument about The Big Game to one about the playoffs. It's more likely that either a team just as "worthy" as the last team to get in gets or excluded or that a team clearly not as "worthy" as the next-to-last team to be included gets included as that the N teams are the "worthy" ones to battle it out for "all the marbles."
Moreover, even if whatever N is chosen proves to be the right N for a given year -- or always -- the same arguments that warrant worrying over whether Team X gets in or is left out recur, only concerning where Team X gets seeded; the argument about whether Team X is "really Number 3" applies to seeding Team X third just as it does to whether Team X plays in the BCS Championship Game.
Besides, it is just a game. (Too bad folks didn't worry just as much about whether invading Iraq was justified.)
I know you were just waiting to hear what I thought. Glad I could straighten it all out.
3:46:02 PM
|
|
EBay Negative on Negativland IPod
An artist modified a U2 iPod to make a statement about intellectual
property rights and free culture, then listed the customized gadget on
eBay. Apple wasn't amused, and the auction site removed the listing --
but attorneys say the artist did nothing wrong.
By Katie Dean. [Wired News]
10:34:19 AM
|
|
John Leyden
reports, in The Register:
Virus writers have begun distributing their wares in emails
that pose
as Lycos's abandoned "Make love not spam" screensaver.
The fake screensaver emails contain an attachment with a RAR SFX
archive that has embedded key logger Trojan inside, antivirus firm
Sophos warns. Infected emails come in emails with subject lines such
as "Be the first to fight spam with Lycos screen" and an attachment
called "Lycos screensaver to fight spam.zip".
Upon successful installation, the key logging Trojan (Mdropper-IT)
sends a message to an Indonesian email address confirming its status.
The screensaver file, rather than displaying the Lycos screensaver,
displays a blank screen.
"Make Love Not Spam" was designed to bombard spam websites with
requests, so increasing their bandwidth charges without - in theory -
shutting them down. Security firms criticised Lycos's use of
"vigilante tactics" especially when two of the targeted websites
became unavailable. Several major internet backbone providers and ISP
blocked access to Lycos' www.makelovenotspam.com website over concerns
over its questionable legality.
Lycos denied it was doing anything wrong, much less creating a DDoS
attack platform, but it suspended screensaver downloads after spammers
began redirected traffic back to makelovenotspam.com.
This won't necessarily stop people falling for the VX ruse,
unfortunately; fake Lycos screensavers will likely become a staple of
social engineering tricks for weeks to come.
How long was the path from that cleverware to that malware?
9:34:15 AM
|
|
Gartner: Consumers dissatisfied with online security, by Paul
Roberts, ComputerWorld.
Or, as Mark E. S. Bernard so soothily spoke on the ISN list today:
Dear Associates,
As there any surprises here? I think that we're probably all a little
concerned about online security. But for those who aren't sure what
to think there is always the option of paying Gartner $17k to have
them tell you what you should be thinking!!
Based on research that I have conducted against the Privacy
Commissioners database of completed investigations over 67% of nearly
three-hundred investigations here in Canada have been conducted
against financial institutions. In contrast 97% of those
investigations have required residual remedies to be developed and
implemented to resolve confirmed issues. Lesson learned, do your home
work up front and avoid productivity issues, federal investigations
and wasting time/money.
9:34:10 AM
|
|
|