Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Didn't find what you were looking for?
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Thursday, March 03, 2005 |
From BNA News:
-
DELL CEO WARNS AGAINST NEW RESTRICTIONS ON DIGITAL DEVICES
Dell CEO Kevin Rollins said yesterday that Congress and the
courts should avoid imposing restrictions on ways consumers
use computers and other devices to listen to digital music
and watch movies. Rollins also said entertainment companies
should work closely with technology firms to build new
businesses delivering music and movies to consumers.
-
CUSTOMER DETAILS LOGGED AT INDIA'S CYBER CAFES
Hundreds of Internet cafes in India's technology hub of
Bangalore have started to record personal details of their
visitors to comply with a new rule aimed at tracking
perpetrators of online fraud, virus attacks and terrorism.
Internet users have expressed concern that the law would
lead to invasion of privacy and police harassment, while
cafe owners feared a drop in customers.
-
KOREA CONSIDERS NEW COPYRIGHT RENTAL RIGHT FOR COMICS
South Korea is considering a new amendment to its copyright
law that would create a rental right for comics. The
proposal has generated controversy since in the comic book
publishing market, rental shops account for 60 percent of
the buyers, but most of them are struggling and additional
fees might cause the whole rental market might collapse.
11:35:10 AM
|
|
MGM v. Grokster: Here's Why P2P is Valuable.
Briefs defending Grokster's right to exist were filed yesterday in MGM v. Grokster, from Intel, Creative Commons [PDF], and many others. Among them, 17 computer science professors laid out the case for P2P, beginning with principles: "First, the United States' description of the Internet's design is wrong. P2P networks are not new developments in network design, but rather the design on which the Internet itself is based." Pointedly, the EFF compares this case's arguments to those made over 20 years ago in the Betamax case, which established the public's right to use video-copying technology, because of its "substantial non-infringing uses," even though many used videotape to infringe copyright. We'll soon see whether that right will extend to peer-to-peer software: the Supreme Court takes this up on March 29th.
[unmediated]
6:31:55 AM
|
|
Eben Moglen & Co. on Grokster: Look Past the Rhetoric (Donna Wentworth).
Rik Lambers of the highly recommended CoCo blog writes: "Eben Moglen has filed his brief on behalf of the Free Software Foundation and New Yorkers for Fair Use. A PDF is available through his blog."
Excerpt: "At the heart of Petitioners' argument is an arrogant and unreasonable claim -- even if made to the legislature empowered to determine such a general issue of social policy -- that the Internet must be designed for the convenience of their business model, and to the extent that its design reflects other concerns, the Internet should be illegal. ...Despite petitioners' apocalyptic rhetoric, this case follows a familiar pattern in the history of copyright: incumbent rights-holders have often objected to new technologies of distribution that force innovation on the understandably reluctant monopolist."
Thank you, Rik. [Copyfight]
6:24:21 AM
|
|
|