A blog doesn't need a clever name
Cyberethics, Crypto, Community, Freedom, Privacy, Property, Philosophy, MP3, Online Ed, Copyright, Iran, other current topics and fun stuff
Last updated:
9/1/05; 5:49:50 AM


August 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Jul   Sep



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "A blog doesn't need a clever name" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Didn't find what you were looking for?




-
Listed on BlogShares

E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Writing About Real People.

And the broader question: Is it just too risky to blog about anything that refers to anyone other than a loved one or public figure?

[iBeth]

I hope not.

Yet, I've been pretty circumspect. One of the reasons all my blog efforts have mainly been of the filter-link variety. The actual naming of the neighbor is one of the things that motivated me to blink that item of Beth's the other day, but if she thinks better of it, then I do, too.

This neighbor case is sensitive to blog about because it's already sensitive. Dunno what the boundaries are as a rule or even for me.


10:29:16 PM    comment []

Vista Fury.

It's clear from several stories on CNET this week that the security technology variously known as "trusted computing," "Palladium," and "NGSCB" will be deployed to some extent in the next iteration of the Windows operating system, now code-named "Vista," due to be shipped sometime next year. In a nutshell, this technology creates secure areas of your computer that you can't access, touch, or control, except to a limited degree. It's sometimes referred to as a separate "sandbox" for you to work and play in on your computer -- a sandbox that may be used to isolate viruses and to thwart hacker attacks, but that is primarily designed as space for playback of entertainment media in ways that keep that content safe from you, the user.

What it will mean is that, in order to have access to the entertainment media you purchase, you may have to load it into this separate sandbox, which is under the control of somebody other than you. Controls built into entertainment content may determine that your computer isn't a safe enough environment for the content to be viewed in, and may shut playback off if, for example, you are piping the content out through analog rather than digital connections. (Analog connections are famously more difficult to control than digital ones are.) Alternatively, it may shut off analog connections altogether while the content is playing.

I am less troubled by Microsoft's impulse to develop a new approach to digital-rights management than I am about what this new DRM, if it becomes the norm, may mean for the computer revolution. Twenty-five years ago, the impulse that kicked off the development of the personal computer -- and all the related markets that have sprung up since then -- was the ability PCs gave to any user to control and inspect every aspect of the computer's hardware and software. This openness was a huge source of innovation and exploration, and it fueled the digital economy. What happens when we turn the personal computer, even to a limited degree, into just another conduit for someone else's content, aimed at your eyeballs? I don't pretend to know the answer to that question, but I will say that limiting my ability to tinker with and control my own computers is disturbing to me, to say the least.

I will say I am amused at this description of Vista's potential for "downresolution" of high-definition content:

Alternately, Vista will include a "constriction" feature that can decrease the resolution of high-definition video on the fly, outputting a version that is slightly fuzzier (about the same as today's DVDs) than the pristine original. This can be used as an alternative to blocking a connection altogether, if a content company won't let high-definition video play over the lower-security outputs.

I'm afraid I've reached the age where downresolution to "mere" DVD quality doesn't strike me as very frightening, since I might not even notice the difference.

Of course, my primary complaint here is about the closing of what used to be the open architectures of personal computers. Cory Doctorow makes a different, equally important point about what this change in the personal computing platform may mean for copyright and consumers.

[Godwin's Law]


10:18:24 PM    comment []

Secrecy Veils China's Jailing of a Journalist. Zhao Yan has been held in one of the darkest corners of China's legal system, accused of leaking state secrets to his employer, The New York Times. By JIM YARDLEY. [NYT > International]
10:17:36 PM    comment []

New Antibiotics Successful against Superbugs. On Scientific American [NewsIsFree: Popular Items]
10:17:28 PM    comment []

Chinese Apparel Makers Increasingly Seek the Creative Work. For garment makers in the U.S. and Europe, the next shake-up is likely to come not from China's semiskilled seamstresses, but from its ambitious would-be designers. By KEITH BRADSHER. [NYT > Business]
10:16:12 PM    comment []

Three from BNA News:
  1. GAO FINDS FEDERAL DATA MINING FAILS TO PROTECT PRIVACY The GAO unveiled yesterday that none of five federal agencies using electronic data mining to track terrorists, catch criminals, or prevent fraud complied with all rules for gathering citizen information. As a result, they cannot ensure that individual privacy rights are appropriately protected.
  2. PANDORA MUSIC SERVICE KNOWS WHAT YOU LIKE PC World profiles the new Pandora music site. The service, which debuted this week, builds up tailored streams of music based on a user's stated preference for an artist or a song. The first 10 hours of Pandora are free. After that, subscriptions costs $3 per month or $36 per year.
  3. MICROSOFT VISTA TO INCLUDE UNPRECEDENTED DRM CONTROLS As Microsoft readies the next version of its Windows operating system, called Vista, the software giant is building in unprecedented levels of safeguards against video piracy. For the first time, the Windows operating system will wall off some audio and video processes almost completely from users and outside programmers, in hopes of making them harder for hackers to reach. The company is establishing digital security checks that could even shut off a computer's connections to some monitors or televisions if antipiracy procedures that stop high-quality video copying aren't in place.

10:53:22 AM    comment []

Cal State Combats Thieves in Cyberspace, By Katy Murphy, Trivalley Herald.
Every morning, Thomas Dixon goes into his office at California State University, East Bay, knowing that a million attempts will be made - each hour - to break into the computer system he is charged with protecting.

10:53:17 AM    comment []



© Copyright 2005 Bruce Umbaugh. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 9/1/05; 5:50:01 AM.
Powered by
(-- £ Salon Bloggers & --)