Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Didn't find what you were looking for?
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Friday, June 02, 2006 |
Harry Potter's Invisibility Cloak Is Possible, Studies Say
(Bloomberg).
The key to making an object invisible is to surround it
with a cloak made of ``metamaterials'' that are engineered to bend
light around an object, continuing on the other side in the same
direction as before, Ulf Leonhardt, author of one of the studies, said
in a telephone interview. Sound waves, which have a longer wavelength
than light, can be distorted in such a way, and light bends naturally
in mirages, for instance, he said.
``All one has to do is enhance this bending effect and control it
better,'' said Leonhardt, Professor of theoretical physics at the
University of St. Andrews in Scotland. ``We've given recipes of how to
do this. You have to control structures that are smaller than the
wavelength of light -- less than half a micrometer,'' he said. A
micrometer is a millionth of a meter.
The authors of the papers set out mathematical requirements for a
theoretical metamaterial, that could achieve invisibility. . . . .
. . .
The two papers, ``Controlling Electromagnetic Fields'' by Pendry,
Schurig and Smith, and ``Optical Conformal Mapping,'' by Leonhardt,
were published yesterday by Science Express, the online advance
publication of the journal Science. The Duke/Imperial research was
supported by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency.
That's "all one has to do," indeed: enhance and control the bending
effect on the light -- um, without adversely affecting the wearer of
the cloak. Still, intriguing.
3:43:56 PM
|
|
Plagiarism review recommends faculty dismissals, by Kyle Kondik,
The Post (Ohio University).
An independent review of plagiarism in the Russ College of
Engineering and Technology found that plagiarism has been “rampant and
flagrant” for the past 20 years.
. . .
The report also recommends Provost Kathy Krendl “initiate the dismissal
of the current chair of the department immediately” and another faculty
member, who advised 11 questionable theses.
. . .
The university’s next step is to solicit the advice of Gary Pavela, the
director of judicial programs and student ethical development at the
University of Maryland, who will be on campus Tuesday, Krendl said. He
will help the university reconcile differences between the independent
review by Bloemer and Meyer and the Academic Honesty Oversight
Committee report, advising the university on best practices to combat
plagiarism, according to Krendl and a university news
release.
CHE story:
Review Confirms Plagiarism by Ohio U. Graduate Students and Recommends
Professors' Dismissals, by Paula Wasley. (subscription required)
Mr. Matrka, who began collecting evidence of graduate
student plagiarism in 2004 after his adviser told him his own thesis
was unacceptable, said that complaints of plagiarism within the
engineering college dated back to 1985, but that university
administrators had been slow to act on the issue until recently.
Some people think that the faculty maybe just had this slip by
them, he said. But when you see two theses with the same title
approved by the same professor, with the same first page, I think that
speaks for itself.
Subject: Plagiarism in the Department of Mechanical Engineering in the
Russ College of Engineering at Ohio University (memo to the
Provost)
There can never be a time or reason at an academic
institution, such as our Ohio University, when plagiarism can be
justified. Equally, there can not be any tolerance of the individuals
who participate in this serious misconduct. The ad hoc committee of the
college established some guidelines to mitigate the obvious problems
but we do not concur that the problems are caused by the graduate
students and subsequently it is up to the graduate students to remedy
the situation. When a faculty member becomes the advisor/mentor of a
graduate student, she/he automatically assumes the responsibilities to
monitor the progress of the students as they advance to become
professionals. Supervision of theses is part of the process. We are
appalled that three members of the faculty in mechanical engineering
have so blatantly chosen to ignore their responsibilities by
contributing to an atmosphere of negligence toward issues of academic
misconduct in their own department. We are amazed to see that the
internal ad hoc committee recommended no reprimand for those
individuals. (Continues with the committee's
recommendations.)
12:43:53 PM
|
|
|