Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Didn't find what you were looking for?
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Monday, June 05, 2006 |
Nature and peer review.
"Nature is undertaking a trial of a particular type of open peer review.In this trial,authors whose submissions to Nature are sent for peer review will also be offered the opportunity to participate in an open peer review process (see below for explanation).The trial is optional for authors;it will continue in parallel with Nature's usual procedures,and does not affect the likelihood of eventual publication of the submitted work.At the same time as the trial,Nature is running a web debate on peer review,to which we welcome comments from readers".
Nature Peer Review Trial and Debate [Smart Mobs]
7:51:33 PM
|
|
Kornbluth's MySpace nightmare.
Josh Kornbluth, the monologuist and KQED host, has posted an account of a Kafkaesque experience with MySpace that should give any operator of an online business pause.
It seems that some malicious person posted a phony profile under Josh's name, filled the profile page with gross porn, and then sent Josh's superiors at KQED outraged emails demanding that he be fired. Josh's posting offers a painfully vivid account of how hard it can be to attempt to communicate directly with a company that has chosen to make itself unavailable to the public.
. . .
[Scott Rosenberg's Links & Comment]
7:51:07 PM
|
|
From Benton Headlines:
INTERNET SURVEILLANCE PROVIDERS
[SOURCE: Los Angeles Times, AUTHOR: Editorial Staff]
[Commentary] The Bush Administration has opened
talks with leading Internet providers and search
engines about preserving their records. The
Justice Department apparently wants Internet
companies to keep two years' worth of data on
where users go, what they search for and to whom
they send e-mail. The ostensible purpose is to
combat child pornography and terrorism. That's a
laudable goal. It's not at all clear, however,
that this plan would put more bad guys behind
bars. It's more likely that the new troves of
data would attract hackers or trial lawyers. But
before Internet companies or lawmakers agree to
this plan, the Justice Department should have to
show that the change is needed to put more child
pornographers and terrorists behind bars. How
many cases, if any, have foundered because
investigators had access to only a few months'
worth of data rather than two years' worth? The
benefits of the new approach may be questionable, but the risks are not.
2:49:17 PM
|
|
Back to the Bunker, by William Arkin, Wash Post.
On a "continuity of government" exercise involving 4000 federal
employees, to take place in two weeks (June 19). These exercises go
beyond assuring Executive succession and control of nukes to include
education and commodities futures trading and 29 other agencies. Arkin
argues that the conception of "continuity" in policy now is defective:
that it is too broad, and that we should not rely on a "bunker"
mentality.
11:48:48 AM
|
|
The Defense Information Systems Agency wants industry input on tools
that could counter insider threats to Defense Department information
systems -- "DISA seeks input on insider threat tools," by Bob
Brewin, FCW.
DISA said traditional efforts to secure networks focus on outside
threats, but insiders pose an equally damaging threat. And they can
access DOD networks without detection by the security systems.
DISA, in a request for information released June 1 [1], said it is
looking for an insider threat focused observation tool that could be
deployed on selected host DOD machines to aggressively gather and
analyze data on inside threats.
. . .
The agency would install the host machines on network end points and
could be servers, desktop PCs or laptop PCs equipped with agent-based
tools that can monitor insider network activity. The tool would
collect data such as user IDs, computer type and the processes -
e-mail clients, Web browsers, office management tools, database access
- that monitored computers run.
DISA said it wants tools that can then conduct user analysis on the
collected data and warn of anomalies based on user profiles and
behavior patterns.
. . .
[1] http://www.fbo.gov/spg/DISA/D4AD/DITCO/RFI418/listing.html
7:49:24 AM
|
|
Working-Class Students Increasingly End Up at Community Colleges,
Giving Up on a 4-Year Degree, by Stephen Burd, CHE (subscription).
Now that Ms. Fye has taken on debt, the prospect of taking
on more loans to pursue a bachelor's degree frightens her. "I'd like to
go to school to make life better," she says. "But I don't want to be in
debt for the rest of my life, especially now that I have a child to
take care of."
With the price of four-year colleges increasingly out of reach for
working-class students, more of them are turning to community colleges.
Many see those institutions as offering a cost-effective way to
jump-start their pursuit of a bachelor's degree — allowing them to
fulfill their basic requirements at less-costly institutions before
transferring to four-year colleges to complete their degrees.
Policy makers are increasingly touting this pathway for low- and
moderate-income students. Education Secretary Margaret Spellings,
responding to concerns about the declining purchasing power of Pell
Grants, as expressed at an appropriations subcommittee hearing in
March, said community colleges offered good values that could be
covered by Pell Grants. To lower their costs, students could be
"starting there rather than at a state university," she said.
But some higher-education researchers believe it is irresponsible to
promote such an approach, noting that fewer than half of all students
who enroll in community colleges with the intention of transferring to
a four-year college — like Ms. Fye — ever do.
"The evidence is that students who start their college life at a
two-year college are much less likely to end up with a bachelor's
degree," says Michael S. McPherson, president of the Spencer Foundation
and a longtime commentator on student-aid issues.
One must ask, "much less likely to end up with a bachelor's degree"
than whom? According to the U.S. Education Department, more
than 80 percent of full-time students at community colleges work. Over
40 percent of students at those institutions work 35 hours a week or
more.
All that work is extremely detrimental to the progress of those
students, Ms. Weitz says, because they tend to become disengaged from
their studies.
"Students will come here and they'll run to class and then they'll run
to the library to do an assignment, and then they've got to get into
the car and go to work. And then, oh, by the way, they have a family,"
she says. "So that sense of engagement, that sense of focus, for many
of them, is lost. And I think that's a major contributor as to why
their completion rates are
not as high."
7:48:14 AM
|
|
|