Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Didn't find what you were looking for?
E-mail this blog's author, Bruce Umbaugh: 
|
|
 |
Monday, June 12, 2006 |
Four from BNA News:
COURT OVERTURNS XEROX PATENT RULING
A US appeals court has overturned a district-court decision
that a Xerox patent on handwriting-recognition technology
was invalid. The patent dispute dates back to 1997, when
Xerox alleged that Palm's text-entry technology used in the
company's handheld devices infringed a Xerox patent for
similar technology.
CHINA RESTORES ACCESS TO GOOGLE.COM
China has lifted its online blockade of Google.com after a
two-week crackdown that had prevented direct access to the
site and temporarily thwarted popular workarounds.The
Paris-based journalism advocacy group Reporters Without
Borders said that tests revealed the uncensored version of
the search site was accessible again to Internet users in
Beijing and Shanghai. The crackdown overlapped with the June
4 anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.
CHINA WALKS OUT OF ENCRYPTION
MEETING
An international dispute over a wireless computing standard
took a bitter turn last week with the Chinese delegation
walking out of a global meeting to discuss the technology.
The delegation's walkout from a two-day meeting in the Czech
Republic escalated an already rancorous struggle by China to
gain international acceptance for its homegrown encryption
technology known as WAPI.
[Washington Post]
REPORT CLAIMS TAIWAN TOP SOURCE OF SPAM
According to CipherTrust, the majority of spam servers are
physically located in Taiwan. In research conducted in May,
the e-mail security company found that 64 percent of
machines sending out junk mail were in that country. Next
was the United States with 23 percent and third China, with
3 percent. CipherTrust also determined that unwanted e-mail
traffic went up as much as 20 percent worldwide in May.
10:50:06 AM
|
|
Digital Maoism? (Or Mau-Mauism?).
Jaron Lanier writes a spectacularly flawed essay on the supposed "hazards of the new collectivism," looking at collaborative projects like Wikipedia from the outside and equaiting them with the dictatorship of the proletariat. He so misses the point that he triiggers a set of responses far more interesting than his piece, though they have their own flaws. I think Howard Rheingold has the best response:
Collective action involves freely chosen self-election (which is almost always coincident with self-interest) and distributed coordination; collectivism involves coercion and centralized control; treating the Internet as a commons doesn't mean it is communist (tell that to Bezos, Yang, Filo, Brin or Page, to name just a few billionaires who managed to scrape together private property from the Internet commons). It's interesting to see the usual suspects attempt to grab the river's current and keep it still.
[Weblogsky]
12:14:59 AM
|
|
And that's two, as the Mavs took care of business on their home court, and Mark posts: S-T-A-C-K.
Say it loud. Say it proud.
We have to play so much better, but when a guy can have such a huge impact. WOW !
cut down the turnovers. Push the ball. Be more efficient. Keep working on D.
12:06:09 AM
|
|
|