July 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Jun   Aug

 
 
Other blogs I visit


Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Science news" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, David Harris:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Friday, July 26, 2002

Asteroid hysteria

Some of the media have had a field day with the news about a possible close encounter between an asteroid and the Earth on February 1, 2019.

The British tabloids in particular have been going crazy (what's new?) The Daily Mail ran the headline "The end is nigh", the Daily Mirror calls it the armageddon asteroid. The Times calls it the rock of doom and points out that we are 28 times more likely to be hit by the asteroid than a person is to win the National Lottery. But, come on, 28 times essentially zero is still essentially zero...

The scientists point out that the uncertainty in the position of the asteroid is still tens of millions of kilometres. The Earth is about 12,000 kilometres in diameter. So, according to our current knowledge, the chance of the asteroid hitting the earth is a bit like throwing a grain of rice randomly at a football field and happening to hit a football left behind on the field. Time to panic? Perhaps not.

All this said, it's still pretty important to keep track of the asteroids out there - perhaps something could hit us - and if an asteroid collided with Earth, we could be looking at anything from a pretty serious earthquake to annihilation of humans.

Is it good enough to only look at half the sky though? You might not realise that the only dedicated asteroid observatory in the southern hemisphere was closed in 1996...

The fear factor has brought the entrepreneurial spirit out in some - there are already a handful of proposals circulating for how to stop a killer asteroid - and they don't all involve Bruce Willis or Ben Affleck. One is to blow the thing up with laser beams projected from a dozen platforms in orbit. And that proposal came from somebody with a slightly vested interest in such technology... there's always somebody ready to turn a buck and it helps if there is enough public fear to cause a kneejerk government reaction.

At least the scientists are keeping calm about it all. They know that the chance is incredibly slim - and are keeping watch on the asteroid, just to make sure it stays out of trouble.

Doubling the National Science Foundation budget

Now that the National Institute of Health has had it's funding doubled over five years, the senate has just approved a 12% increase to the NSF budget. This puts it on track toward a five year doubling.

The increase is nearly the 15% requested by lobbyists and more than twice what GWB requested.

More details at Science

Terrorism and scientific publications

Nicholas Wade writes in today's NY Times that the American Society for Microbiology is considering withholding from scientific publications some details that could assist terrorists turn research to nefarious purposes.

The ASM president says he is "leaning against the proposal" which is probably a good thing. There are other options available and allowing partial submission changes the entire nature of scientific publication. If a study can't be repeated for any reason, including lack of information about the original, then it is of limited value. It also opens up significant potential for scientific fraud.

Perhaps another option, if limiting the publication of data is considered necessary, is to just not publish these sensitive topics, as was done in the 1940s with research on nuclear physics.

Information overload for space probes

Next generation space instruments will be collecting more data than they can transmit back to Earth using existing types of radio communication. The bandwidth problem will be just like trying to watch streaming video over a low-speed dial-up connection - you can't keep up with the flow.

One suggested solution is to send the data back by laser. However, other people suggest that the difficulties are too great and that there is untapped potential in radio.


< % radio.macros.weblogEditBox ()%>



© Copyright 2006 David Harris. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 1/25/2006; 2:09:05 PM.
Powered by