Radio Free Blogistan has moved. The last entries posted to the old address are the ones you see here dated October 25, 2002.
For current entries, please go to the new address: http://radiofreeblogistan.com/.
categories: salonika fireweaver knowhow memewatch metablog outspoken radioactive syllabus x-pollen
11:12:21 PM
say what []
Meanwhile, this is more or less a dummy post to see if the rendering will fix itself. For some reason I am suddenly also unable to reach http://radio.userland.com/ where the information about #upstream.xml syntax and the script that fixes URL errors after upstreaming changes can ordinarily both by located.
Update: Ugh, it gets worse and worse. When using that abovementioned script, Salon blog users, be sure to replace the string "radio.weblogs.com" with "blogs.salon.com." I now have nested redirection problems!
Publishing this to several categories to see if it will stop salonika from squatting on the home page (now that fireweaver is pointing offsite.
categories: salonika fireweaver metablog radioactive
2:49:45 PM
say what []
If I were really cool, I'd redesign this page so that it contained the moving message and then loaded the new page at http://radiofreeblogistan.com/ automatically, or immediately redirected to that page, or something cool like that. Instead people ending up here will have to follow a link like this one or the one in the title of this entry.
If the move fails, then this message will seem kind of lame and embarassing in retrospect.
For the technically minded, I will continue to use the Salon hosting and address for my salonika category, and possibly for hosting images and other large files within my storage quota.
The blog-related categories (knowhow, metablog, radioactive, syllabus), along with a few knew ones (uh, i don't know... bloggerz, stereomovabletype?) will also be upstreamed to sections of radiofreeblogistan.com.
The others will be squirted off to more appropriate hosts (for completists: fireweaver will show up at Dreamweaver Savvy once I get the templating integrated, memewatch will migrate to memewatch.com, outspoken will fold back into Bite Media, and x-pollen will go to x-pollen.com).
I'm starting another new category today, unrelated to blogs. It's called "Agent7," it's about my clients and colleagues in the worlds of technology and publishing, and especially their instersection, and it will end up at waterside.com once we get the server-side includes inserted into the appropriate page.
Update: The first try failed. I tried to copy the old #upstream.xml file into the subcategories that I didn't want coming over to radiofreeblogistan.com but that somehow resulted in a strange out-of-date rendering of the home page.
To fix that I'm editing this file and reposting after throwing away the bad upstream files and restoring Radio to community upstreaming. If things get back to normal, I'll try the FTP approach, possibly by publishing yet another change to this cross-category entry.
categories: salonika fireweaver knowhow memewatch metablog outspoken radioactive syllabus x-pollen
1:59:17 PM
say what []
1:41:48 PM
say what []
2:17:46 PM
say what []
I still have a chance of getting my now-comfortable No. 3 position back in a few days, but with the picky pornographer back on the case, my overall standing in the long run remains in doubt.
3:28:00 PM
say what []
Face it, naming your blog is the old band-name game writ large. There are so many more good band names than there are good bands. I could update that observation and maybe call it xian's law: "There are more good blog names than there are good blogs."
But names are important. I won't belabor that. The Maturin character in one of Patrick O'Brian's books says at one point that one of the oldest superstitions is "naming calls."
As a title, "Naked Emperor" (most recently seen tangling with pundiblogocrat N.Z. Bear) gets right to the point. It has the perfect tagline as well: Exposing the Obvious.
10:32:07 AM
say what []
To quote Scott, "That sounds good, but it gives the magazine a convenient out, a chance to bury the embarrassing incident. There's no reason the magazine couldn't 'continuously publish' the stories with an explicit statement that they're not honest and truthful. Time's approach is what the New Republic should have adopted: Leave the stories up, leave the historical record intact and append a note to readers (with appropriate links) explaining the subsequent history. With this method of dealing with errors, journalists can actually make the Web function better than print: After all, you don't find magazines going into the library stacks inserting notes of retraction into bound volumes.It's a tough call either way, but I imagine the article will be preserved by the wayback machine and its ilk
categories: salonika
4:15:20 PM
say what []

My Feeds:
A Supposedly Staggering Infinite Work of Heartbreaking Illumination I'll Never Read (rss)
Christian Science Monitor (rss)
Comments for usernum 1111 on server http://rcs.salon.com/rcsComments/comments (rss)
David Harris' Science News (rss)
Don W Strickland: RadioFAQ (rss)
Governor Cashmore's Diary (rss)
John Robb's Radio Weblog (rss)
Macromedia - Designer Developer Center (rss)
Macromedia Resource Feed (rss)
New York Times: International News (rss)
She's Actual Size, Nationwide, Believe (rss)
Washington Post: Editorial (rss)
Washington Post: Front Page (rss)
WIL WHEATON DOT NET: Where is my mind? (rss)
xBlog: The visual thinking weblog | XPLANE (rss)
Here's how this works.
| October 2002 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
| Sep Nov | ||||||