Dave Cullen's Blog. Includes links to my blog, bio, Columbine book, The Columbine Guide, evidence about Eric Harris & Dylan Klebold, and information on other school shooters, etc.

Tuesday, August 19, 2003


You should support SLDN because . . .

. . . You might meet Reichen!

SLDN is Servicemember's Legal Defense Network, and they're a great organization working to end Don't Ask, Don't Tell, and providing legal assistance to those men and women being forced out in the meantime. (They are the main org in that area.)

Reichen has apparently been active for awhile now, and here's a picture of him at the group's Red, White and Pool party in June--without his shirt, and without Chip!; ruh roh. Hope Chip just had other committments or was haning out over by the keg. We should learn Friday if there is anything to those persistent rumors.


Comment                     8:37:34 PM                      [Macro error: Can't evaluate the expression because the name "trackbackLink" hasn't been defined.]                     




Burning Man?

Burning Man--for or against?

I need to know. I'm going stir crazy holed up in Denver, today I just about lost it. Seriously. I need to get out of here and some friends are coming in from NYC this weekend, want me to hop in the pickup with them Monday, drive 20 hours into Nevada and spend a week in the hippie dippie desert at Burning Man.

I've always wanted to check it out. One of those things I could lover or could hate, but I'm dying to know what it's all about. The problem is, I'm thinking I may pull a cornea muscle or two from eyerolling, which is fine for the short-term experience for a day or two, but more than three and I'll be engulfed in clustrophobia. I week and I may suicidal. Not literally, but I may be fantasizing about being the type of person to escape that way.

Plus, I figured it was totally over three years ago when Walter Isaacson showed up. A jump the shark moment if ever there was one.

You people know me better than anyone. At least some of you think you do. Or at the very least you have opinions of your own. So tell me what to do. You'll have to email because of the temporary comments-problem; hopefully you can figure out how to decode this: davecullen-AT-earthlink-DOT-net (apparently posting your actual email is just asking for worse spamming than I already live through).


Comment                     8:24:57 PM                      [Macro error: Can't evaluate the expression because the name "trackbackLink" hasn't been defined.]                     




Who overrates this crap?

Just when I thought I'd get ripped a new one for slamming that critical darling Sex and the City, I get referred to this scathing essay posted just a few hours earlier in KnotMagazine, a site I've just recently discovered, via a very hearty endorsement by The Black Table, which I'm also just starting to enjoy.

The gist:

The show featured nothing particularly funny, nothing transgressive, nothing fresh. The women highlighted weren't trailblazing anything but a path of vacuous sensualism and materialism so shallow that it would make Imelda Marcos look like Kant.


Comment                     8:14:46 PM                      [Macro error: Can't evaluate the expression because the name "trackbackLink" hasn't been defined.]                     




An essentially dishonest man

George Will. The man likes to cull through obscure historical and almanac material to pull together true facts to distort the truth. He counts on you not looking them up. This Sunday, he counted on you living outside of Denver.

If you watched This Week With George Stephanopoulus, and you actually sat through Will's closing essay, you probably left with the impression that "Denver is competing with CA to be the capital of low political comedy." That was his opening quote, and he concluded with this retread: "Give Denver its due. It is giving California a run for its money in this summer's absurdity sweepstakes."

Here's why: A man named Jeff Peckman has gathered enough signatures to get a Safety Through Peace initiative on the ballot, which would require the goverment to implement stress-reducing measures. Here's how Georgie described what Denver is up against: "Peckman's measure might require Denver to pipe into public places soothing music; sitars, perhaps--and what Peckman calls primordial sounds. Maybe recordings of wind rustling the aspen leaves, or the noises whales make. Perhaps the city would pay for incense on buses and massages in every park. Or mass mediation in Mile High stadium when the Broncos are not using it for their stressful work."

That was an unabridged transcript of the heart of his essay. Only two problems. First, he's making most of it up. Check out his wording, with emphasis added: "Peckman's measure might require Denver to pipe into public places soothing music; sitars, perhaps--and what Peckman calls primordial sounds. Maybe recordings of wind rustling the aspen leaves, or the noises whales make. Perhaps the city would pay for incense on buses and massages in every park. Or mass mediation in Mile High stadium when the Broncos are not using it for their stressful work."

He must have had fun making up all the most outlandish initiatives he could think of--though he wasn't very creative; nothing but boilerplate wingnut cliches--too bad none of that is proposed in the initiative. A whimsical little (very little) USA Today story written by a local reporter states that the measure "doesn't tell Denver's local government how to do it, merely to work for it. But the measure's author, Denver activist Jeff Peckman, suggests soothing music in public places, improved nutrition in school lunches and other calming steps." All those whale sounds and incense are apparently all just in George's imagination.

Here's the bigger problem: There is virtually no chance of this passing, and virtually no one in Denver is even talking about it. This is one of those odd little newsquirk items that George has elevated to national news and pretended it's making the city into a laughingstock. Only in his mind.

I live in Denver and we have lots of ballot initiatives. We like it that. It's relatively easy to get a measure on the ballot here, extremely hard to pass one. It takes a very solid measure with a strong constituency and a hefty ad budget to pass get a 50/50 shot at passage here. Most still go down in defeat. This group has none of those. It will be a trivial item on the ballot that most people in Denver will never even bother to discuss, except, perhaps to comment on its silliness.

Neither local paper appears to have covered it, though USA Today couldn't resist a cutesy little ditty, and The Washington Times apparently followed. But both papers were responsible enough to make it clear the initiative was going nowhere. They were just having fun with it.

But George took a different tack. Utter seriousness, Denver on the brink. Right.

He knows very few of you live in Denver and you'll just assume we're going whacko again out here in the hinterlands. And he can use the illusion to illustrate how screwed up our political system is. Nothing screwed up here but George Will's indiscernible sense of ethics.


Comment                     8:02:18 PM                      [Macro error: Can't evaluate the expression because the name "trackbackLink" hasn't been defined.]                     




Thieves in High Places

Have I been too negative? Just saw Jim Hightower on The Daily Show. Love that guy. (How not to love a guy who titled his last book, If the Gods Had Meant Us to Vote They Would Have Given Us Candidates?)

He's got a new book out, Thieves in High Places. Haven't read it yet: someone tell me if it sucks.


Comment                     7:10:07 PM                      [Macro error: Can't evaluate the expression because the name "trackbackLink" hasn't been defined.]                     




Did it just fall really far, really fast?

I just forced myself through my fourth episode of this show in under a week. Horrible. It's called Sex and the City. Has it fallen precipitously, or is there some huge conspiracy out there to pretend there's something good about it?

Being a poor struggling writer, I haven't had HBO for years. I saw two episodes visiting a friend a couple years ago and was highly unimpressed. It was so smug about its supposed cleverness--way dumber than it thought it was. But outright awful, despite Sarah Jessic Parker.

Now . . . Hard to decide what's worse, the writing, the acting, the one-dimensional characters, the painfully obvious setups to everything, the cheesy loveboat morals telegraphed by voiceover? Even the Love Boat didn't have to resort to voice-over to present it's moral each episode. And imagine a show where Sarah Jessica Parker is not the worst actress. It tries SO DAMN HARD to pull everything together into these cute little circles, like a Seinfeld episode, but without the talent. Painful one-liners painfully delivered. And what's with all the puns?


Comment                     12:12:20 AM                      [Macro error: Can't evaluate the expression because the name "trackbackLink" hasn't been defined.]