Updated: 8/28/03; 9:19:25 AM.
The Agora
A fair and balanced weblog by Douglas Anders
        

Saturday, January 25, 2003

The Party of Lincoln
The most kick-ass thing I read yesterday wasn't on the internet. It was in my hometown paper, The Blade, which usually doesn't print kick-ass opinion pieces. This appeared on the Op/Ed page as a response to a column by Jack Kelly, a columnist on national security issues for The Blade, claiming that the Republican party was the party of racial equality, and citing as examples, Presidents Lincoln and Eisenhower and Reconstruction. I cannot find a link to this response on The Blade's website, so here is the full article.

The author's name is Michael Bryant, an assistant professor of criminal justice at the University of Toledo. He holds a Ph.D in history from Ohio State University.

As a former professor os history, I feel a duty to the readers of The Blade to correct Jack Kelly's surrealistic love letter to the Republican Party, "GOP off defensive on racism" (Jan. 18). Far from being proponents of "equal justice under the law," Republicans have never looked with favor on the full integration of black Americans.

As early as 1858, Lincoln declared "that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races," assuring his audience that in a society of white and black the whites should always enjoy "the superior position." In an 1862 letter, Lincoln affirmed that his "paramount object in this struggle [i.e. the Civil War] is to save the Union, and it is not either to save or destroy Slavery."

When he decreed the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, it "freed" only slaves in those states that were in open rebellion against the Union, mentioning nothing about the status of slaves on Union-controlled territory. In short, the Proclamation was intended less to free the slaves than to induce loyalty to the Union.

The short-lived integration of black Americans into the body politic immediately after the Civil War ended abruptly through an act of Republican chicanery. The occasion was the 1877 presidential election, in which the Democrat Samuel Tilden enjoyed a 250,000-vote edge over the Republican competitor, Rutherford b. Hayes, with three states yet to be counted. These three states would be decisive. whoever captured their electoral votes would win the presidency. At this point, a deal was struck between the republicans and Southern Democrats.

In exchange for the government's withdrawal of Union troops from the South, Southern Democrats agreed to swing the remaining electoral votes to Hayes. With the withdrawl of Union troops, the sole barrier against the civil disemancipation of southern blacks was removed, and the Jim crow system of institutionalized racism was born. So much for "historic Republican principal of equal justice under the law, as Mr. Kelly absurdly describes it.

Nor did Dwight Eisenhower believe in equal rights for black Americans, despite Mr. Kelly's assertion t the contrary. Eisenhower famously deplored Early Warren's majority opinion in Brown vs. Board (1954), prophesying that it would undermine race relations in the United States. Consistent with this view, when he sent federal troops into Little Rock to ensure orderly desegregation of its public schools, he reassured the nation that his purpose was not to "enforce integration, but to prevent opposition by violence to orders of a [federal] court."

Far from being a "malicious distortion," as Mr. Kelly alleges, the Republican 'Southern strategy" was a conscious plan to win votes by appealing to Southerner's fears of black integration in the late 1960s. Since that time, conjuring fears of the black "bogeyman" has become one of the favorite ruses in the Republican's bag of tricks.

George Bush pere exploited white fears of blacks in the 1988 presidential campaign by accusing Michael Dukakis of supporting a prison furlough program that released a black convict, Willie Horton, who then raped a white woman. Jesse Helms used a similar tactic in his senatorial re-election campaign when he ran a series of ads showing a pair of white hands holding an employment rejection letter. The voice over intoned: "You needed that job, and you were the best qualified, but it had to go to a minority because of a racial quota." Recently, the republicans showed their true stripes again the the Michigan gubernatorial race, in which Republicans sought to discredit the Democratic candidate, Jennifer Granholm, as a supporter of reparations for centuries of slavery.

The Republicans neither are nor ever were defenders of the idea that blacks should be given political, legal, and social equality with whites.

The reality is that Republicans have manipulated white American racism to achieve successes at the ballot box. Blacks are mere props in their bid for power, routinely sacrificed for political gain. Trent Lott's remarks during Strom Thurmond's birthday celebration were thus no misstatements, but an honest expression of Republican views--held covertly--about black civil rights. If a student of mine had handed in a paper fraught with the historical errors in Mr. Kelly's column, it would have received an "F".


11:27:14 AM    comment []trackback []

Oh My God
From the L.A. Times

U.S. Weighs Tactical Nuclear Strike on Iraq

As the Pentagon continues a highly visible buildup of troops and weapons in the Persian Gulf, it is also quietly preparing for the possible use of nuclear weapons in a war against Iraq, according to a report by a defense analyst.

Although they consider such a strike unlikely, military planners have been actively studying lists of potential targets and considering options, including the possible use of so-called bunker-buster nuclear weapons against deeply buried military targets, says analyst William M. Arkin, who writes a regular column on defense matters for The Times.

This is insane. Not only is contemplating using nuclear weapons gainst a nation that doesn't even have them frightening beyond belife, such plans betray a truely frightening arrogance. How will the U.S. gain support from allies like Germany and Japan once this is known? How will Russia and China react? Bush cannot even make the case for war to his own citizens, how will he ever justify using nukes against a nation that has not dirctly attacked us?

No matter how bad I think this administration is, they always get worse.
10:58:33 AM    comment []trackback []


© Copyright 2003 Douglas Anders.
 
January 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Dec   Feb


Blogroll

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Subscribe to "The Agora" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.