Toby's Political Diary - 'Let it Begin Here'
I am from Lexington, Massachusetts. I believe the "war on terror" is a threat to democracy both here and abroad. Over 200 years ago, John Parker, Captain of the 70 Lexington Minutemen facing 700 heavily armed British soldiers said "Stand your ground. Don't fire until fired upon. But if they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Thus began the American revolution. The spirit of this web site is to support the ideals of justice, equality, liberty and the pursuit of happiness where they are under attack today. --Toby Sackton












Subscribe to "Toby's Political Diary - 'Let it Begin Here'  " in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Friday, April 30, 2004
 

Enough Said

From Atrios-- this has to get wide play.

Broadcasting official charged in sex stakeout
Sinclair president, woman arrested in company car

Published on: August 15, 1996
Edition: FINAL
Section: NEWS
Page: 2B
Byline: SUN STAFFPeter Hermann

372

The president of Baltimore-based Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc., which owns the local Fox television affiliate, was arrested Tuesday night and charged with committing a perverted sex act in a company-owned Mercedes, city police said.

David Deniston Smith, 45, of the 800 block of Hillstead Drive in Timonium, who also is Sinclair's chief executive, was arrested in an undercover sting at Read and St. Paul streets, a downtown corner frequented by prostitutes, Baltimore police said yesterday.

Smith and Mary DiPaulo, 31, were charged with committing unnatural and perverted sex act. Smith was held overnight at the Central Booking and Intake Center and released on personal recognizance at 2 p.m. yesterday. DiPaulo's bail status was not available.

Officials at WBFF-TV (Fox 45) and Sinclair, one of the fastest-growing broadcasting companies in the nation with 28 television and 34 radio stations, would not comment yesterday. The company had $126 million in sales in the first half of this year.

Police said undercover Officer Gary Bowman, on a prostitution detail, was talking to DiPaulo about 9: 15 p.m. in a car at St. Paul and Read streets. She left the undercover car after telling Bowman that ``she had just seen her regular date driving in the area,'' according to court documents.

Police said DiPaulo ran across the street to a 1992 Mercedes, registered to Sinclair, and got in on the passenger side. Police followed the car onto the Jones Falls Expressway, where they said they witnessed the two engage in oral sex while Smith drove north.

Police said they followed the car back to Read and St. Paul streets, where they arrested Smith and DiPaulo, who lives in the 700 block of Washington Blvd.
 
Now look at the exchange of letters between McCain and Sinclair

Drudge

McCain Letter to Sinclair Broadcast on Preemption of Nightline
Fri Apr 30 2004 11:29:49 ET

Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) issued the following letter today to Mr. David Smith, President and CEO of Sinclair Broadcast Group, in response to the preemption of this evening's Nightline program:

I write to strongly protest your decision to instruct Sinclair's ABC affiliates to preempt this evening's Nightline program. I find deeply offensive Sinclair's objection to Nightline's intention to broadcast the names and photographs of Americans who gave their lives in service to our country in Iraq.

I supported the President's decision to go to war in Iraq, and remain a strong supporter of that decision. But every American has a responsibility to understand fully the terrible costs of war and the extraordinary sacrifices it requires of those brave men and women who volunteer to defend the rest of us; lest we ever forget or grow insensitive to how grave a decision it is for our government to order Americans into combat. It is a solemn responsibility of elected officials to accept responsibility for our decision and its consequences, and, with those who disseminate the news, to ensure that Americans are fully informed of those consequences.

There is no valid reason for Sinclair to shirk its responsibility in what I assume is a very misguided attempt to prevent your viewers from completely appreciating the extraordinary sacrifices made on their behalf by Americans serving in Iraq. War is an awful, but sometimes necessary business. Your decision to deny your viewers an opportunity to be reminded of war's terrible costs, in all their heartbreaking detail, is a gross disservice to the public, and to the men and women of the United States Armed Forces. It is, in short, sir, unpatriotic. I hope it meets with the public opprobrium it most certainly deserves.

SINCLAIR RESPONDS TO SENATOR MCCAIN

BALTIMORE (April 30, 2004) - The following is a copy of Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.'s (Nasdaq: SBGI) letter sent today to Senator McCain regarding the Company's decision not to air this evening's episode of "Nightline."

April 30, 2004

Senator John McCain
Chairman
United States Senate Commerce Committee
U.S. Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator McCain:

I am writing to respond to your letter to me regarding Sinclair Broadcast Group's decision not to air this evening's episode of "Nightline."

Let me begin by saying that no organization more fully supports our military than Sinclair. In no way was our decision intended to show any disrespect to the brave members of our military, particularly those who have sacrificed their lives in service of our country. To the contrary, our decision was based on a desire to stop the misuse of their sacrifice to support an anti-war position with which most, if not all, of these soldiers would not have agreed.

Senator McCain, together with you, I also support the President's decision to go to war in Iraq. Moreover, while I don't disagree that Americans need to understand the costs of war and sacrifices of our military volunteers, I firmly believe that responsible journalism requires that a discussion of these costs must necessarily be accompanied by a description of the benefits of military action and the events that precipitated that action. To those who would accuse Sinclair of censorship, we ask that they consider the daily decisions of network shows like "Nightline" as to what issues to cover and how they are to be presented, decisions that necessarily involve ignoring other issues and points of view that the networks choose not to present to the American public.

Sinclair's news coverage during the last year has reported on all aspects of the war in Iraq, including the tragic loss of lives of military combatants. In fact, we will be replacing "Nightline" this evening with a balanced report addressing both sides of this controversy. It is worth noting that "Nightline" and its host, Ted Koppel, have ignored repeated requests from Sinclair to comment on their decision regarding the content of tonight's program.

It is "Nightline's" failure to present the entire story, however, to which Sinclair objects. "Nightline" is not reporting news; it is doing nothing more than making a political statement. In simply reading the names of our fallen heroes, this program has adopted a strategy employed by numerous anti-war demonstrators who wish to focus attention solely on the cost of war. In fact, lest there be any doubt about "Nightline's" motivation, both Mr. Koppel and "Nightline's" executive producer have acknowledged that tonight's episode was influenced by the Life Magazine article listing the names of dead soldiers in Vietnam, which article was widely credited with furthering the opposition to the Vietnam war and with creating a backlash of public opinion against the members of the U.S. military who had proudly served in that conflict

In closing, I would like to quote for you the words of Captain Kate Blaise of the U.S. Military. Captain Blaise served in Iraq as a member of the 101st Airborne Division and suffered the loss of her husband Mike who was killed while also serving in Iraq. In commenting on exactly the type of practice which "Nightline" intends to employ, Captain Blaise had this to say:

"I was watching the news, watching this anti-war demonstration and they were reading off names of soldiers who had fallen in Iraq and they read off my husband's name. That made me very angry because he very strongly believed in what he was doing and they were using his name for a purpose that he would not have approved of."


I hope that this letter has adequately addressed your concerns and explained why Sinclair has taken this action. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you in greater detail. In addition, if you are available, we would be delighted to provide you with a chance to be part of our program this evening discussing this issue.


Sincerely yours,

David D. Smith

 


 

6:23:30 PM   comment []   Permanent URL link


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Toby Sackton.
Last update: 5/5/2004; 9:03:13 AM.
April 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Jan   May

Recent Topics:

Court Upholds Bush’s Right to Assassinate Americans

Don’t Think Bush Has Lost his Arrogance about Iraq

Is the Frat Boy in Over His Head?

Solidarity Forever

The Tax Cut and the 2 Million ton Cap

The Peace Movement Grows Up and Gets Healthy

What is to be Done?

Nuclear War: Ignoring the Real Danger

Congressman Sees War in 4 to 6 Weeks; Says Peace Movement Will be Marginalized

The Two Fundamentalisms and How to Fight Them

Bush’s Political Problem with Iraq

Endless War, Endless Fear, Endless Repression

In Canada, You Know We Are at War

The Paid Puppets in the White House

The Anti-Democrats

Things Will Get Worse

Code Talkers

Hill St. Blues and Iraq

Civil Disobedience over War with Iraq?

The New McCarthyism: Secret Arrest and Detention instead of Blacklisting.

Fear Pushers

American Citizen Killed by U.S. Missile Strike in Yemen

A Day Later

Now What?

U.S. Begins Extra-Judicial Killings of Enemy Combatants

20,000 attend Peace Rally on Boston Common

Election Blahs

Thank You Canada

Beware the Black Riders

Bush and Putin: Will Their People Suffer the Consequences?

An Emotional Weekend

The Hollowness at the Center of the Left

The Israeli Hill Youth are Proto-Fascists who Need to be Stopped

Why Do We Oppose the War?

The Generation Gap in the Anti-war Movement

This Week the Media Discovers the Anti-War Movement and Salon Lays an Egg

Who will deliver us from our Fears?

The Fractal Nature of Terror

Hubris, Hubris, Hubris

Wider War Dept.

The Cost of Fanaticism

George W. Sharon and Ariel Bush

The Logic of War

Life in the Wilderness

What is Worth Fighting For

Anti-War Democrats Way Ahead of Their Leaders

Speeding Up the Disinformation Cycle

Lack of Critical Thinking Dept.

Let’s stop talking about the Irrational

Evil on Both Sides Department

Something is Happening Here -- What it is Ain’t Exactly Clear..

Casualties of War or Casualties of Stupidity?

Those Who Benefit from the Denial of Freedom are the Enemies of Freedom

The Antidote to Disinformation

Out of the Mouths of Babes...

The Big Lie

The Value of a White Skin

In the U.S. Elections Still Matter

<

Biggest Lie of the Day Award (Sept. 11th)

From the Real to the Unreal

Families for Peaceful Tomorrows

Crunch Time on the War -- What should we do?


The Danger of Appeasement

The Emperor's New Clothes

The War for Global Hegemony

To Survive as an Evil Dictator get an American President to Hate You


Every Weekend Should be a Three Day Weekend

Have Most People's Lives Changed Since Sept. 11th?

Do We Have Time for This??(being Politically Active)

Whom Do You Know in Prison?

Our Faustian Bargain with Oil

Fundamentalist Attacks On Women Tolerated in Florida and Nigeria


Favorites:

Dubya's Day At the Ranch

The Unreality of War

< £ Salon Bloggers & >