The Devil's Excrement





  The Devil's Excrement
Observations focused on the problems of an underdeveloped country, Venezuela, with some serendipity about the world (orchids, techs, science, investments, politics) at large. A famous Venezuelan, Juan Pablo Perez Alfonzo, referred to oil as the devil's excrement. For countries, easy wealth appears indeed to be the sure path to failure. Venezuela might be a clear example of that.
Last updated:
4/2/2007; 9:34:14 PM

The 2005 Weblog Awards
November 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Oct   Dec












Google


WWW
The Devil's Excrement


Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "The Devil's Excrement" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Satan's Poop Inc. Paila Master:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Sunday, November 27, 2005



Just imagine browsing through the travel section of the Sunday New York Times and finding an article on Caracas with two recommendantions a block from my home, I live a block away from an entrance (the most popular one?) to El Avila National Park and the Tarzilandia Restaurant. I must confess I have not been to Tarzilandia in like 30 years. Read on!

11:03:20 PM    comment []



If the previous post describes a gift to the rich that I find somewhat obscene, there are worse things going on which are incredibly obscene. In the bond offering I described, the terms are known, everyone can put in an order and the National Assembly approves the issue. This contrasts with using the same procedure but assigning the bonds by having the Ministry of Finance “choose” by unknown procedures just a few banks to participate. Then these banks are giving the gift and we can not even know if the profit was 10% or 20% because no info is revealed on these deals. But if they are anything like those of the current bonds offering, we are talking tens of millions of dollars in profit handed out by the Government to their friendly banks. This deals clearly involve corruption. In fact, all of these more “private” deals have not been announced, but have leaked slowly thru the financial system until someone in Government has talked about it.

I talked earlier about the case of the “structured notes” whereby US$ 662 million in these notes was sold to five banks chosen by unknown procedures at the official exchange rate. These banks turned around and sold the notes in US$ making a mint. The fact that it was done privately raises suspicions that corruption was involved, so does the fact that the transaction was revealed by the President of Bandes who held a press conference to make clear that his institution had not sold them, but that they had been sold to the Ministry of Finance who turned around and sold it to the banks.

Well, there were rumors of a similar transaction but with Argentinean bonds. You see Venezuela bought US$ 950 million of that country’s debt as a way of helping that country since there was little interest in purchasing them on the part of foreign investors. Fortunately for the Venezuelan Government emerging market bonds have kept rallying even as interest rates rise in the US and Europe. Well, the Minister of Finance, former mathematician and now proud debt trader Nelson Merentes gloated that the Government had sold some US$ 400 million of these bonds at a profit of US$ 40 million. But you see the bonds were sold to two local banks that made a nice piece of change in the transaction as they paid them with Bolivars at the official rate of exchange. Then, they turned around and sold them in the international markets at a tidy profit in Bolivars.

The question is once again, why those two banks? Why the lack of transparency? Why not sell them in the international markets? Was there a profit in the end for the Government? Obviously these transactions are doubly obscene as there seems to be some sort of corruption involved in the handpicking of the institution that these are sold to. But I will let Teodoro Petkoff in his Tal Cual Editorial give you his opinion:

Swap by Teodoro Petkoff in Tal Cual

 A few days ago we described the shenanigans with the so called “structured notes” of Bandes. Now is the turn of the operation with part of the Argentinean bonds that the Government acquired.

With those, there was also an operation in the secondary market that happens to be of a suspicious nature, much like those of the structured notes. In the first two weeks of October some US$ 300 million in Argentinean bonds were sold to two local banks. They had been acquired by the Venezuelan Government with at a discount at 76.85% of their value and were sold, also at discount, somewhere between 80 and 85%. Did we win one? Keep reading.

At the time, the official controlled Exchange rate was Bs. 2,150 to the US$. With the discount, the implicit price of the bonds was some Bs.2300 per dollar. Where is the trick? In the black market the price was hovering around Bs. 2600 and Bs 2700.

Singing softly those US dollars left the country and maybe they went to the recently bankrupt Refco, where many Venezuelans of the boli-bourgeois -the Bolivarian bourgeoisie- had placed their precious green bills, for which there is no valid exchange control.

Now comes the questions. Who pocketed the differential between the effective Exchange rate (Bs. 2300 per US$) and the black market exchange rate (2600/2700). Supposing a difference of Bs. 300 between both prices, the profit from the operation is around Bs. 900 million. (Petkoff made a “slight” mistake, it is actually 90,000 bolivars or US $ 34 million at the parallel rate he assumed)

How were the buyers selected? It was not done publicly and transparently, that is very clear. There was no auction. What is also clear is that the Merentes method is much more opaque that the Nobrega method, because the latter, at least, covered appearances, holding auctions for the placement of public debt bonds that the country would then issue.

Do you have to be a professional dirty minded person to imagine that the beneficiaries, chosen using fingermocracy for this operation, split the profits with those that put them there?

If we recall the operation with the structured notes, we now have that between the US$ 600 million of the former and the US$300 million the latter, US$ 900 million were placed in the market. The difference between the real or implicit price and the black market is around 3,000 million Bs. Not bad (Once again Petkoff is orders of magnitude off, this is 270,000 million Bs. or a clean US$ 100 million at the pararlel market rate. Unparallelled levels of corruption for Venezuela)

How much was there for each participant? How was the bounty split? Even admitting the lowest differential between the real price of the dollar, implicit in the operation and the black market) there would be some 2,700 (again x 100) million Bs. “sweated” by the chosen banks for the operation and their accomplices in the Government.

The gears of corruption have their own life. Chavez said that there would be no more debt operations and, nevertheless, the Finance Ministry announced an upcoming placement of US$ 1.5 billion. The problem is that the genie of cheating is out of the bottle and nobody has any interest in putting him back in it. Today, much like in the oil boom of the 70’s, the large foreign investment banks pressure, so that Venezuela will maintain its presence in the international markets, issuing debt continuously and on the local side are those that know how to profit from this very easy ride.


8:05:34 PM    comment []



A few months ago, the Electoral Board said that in the upcoming electoral process, the traditional voting "notebooks" would be replaced by electronic ones. What this means is that when you show up to vote, instead of looking you up in a paper notebook and checking that you voted, this would all be computerized. Sumate objected this vigorously, arguing that if the electronic notebook kept the sequence of voters, this could be compared to the sequence in the voting machines and the vote would no longer be secret. This issue was so important to Sumate that there is even a presentation on it at the Sumate website explaining the dangers.

There was the additional objection that the fingerprint machine would also keep this sequence, thus there were two huge flaws in the process. The Electoral Board objected this initially with as much vigor as Sumate, insiting in the elctronic notebooks. For some reason that was never explained, the CNE insisted for weeks that it would use the electornic notebooks. Their main argument was that the voting machine itself did not keep the sequence, because the order of the voting was randomized when it was placed in the memory of the system. However, last week in a trial run, in the presnce of EU and OAS observers, technical people helping the opposition in the audit of the process discovered a file called "last MFT midification time" that did indeed contain the sequence of voters.

While the electronic notebooks were eliminated in the negotiations between the opposition and the Electoral Board, there will be only a small scale trial of their use in this elections, the fingerprint machines will be there and one could easily correlate each voter with his or her vote, despite the earlier assurances by the CNE that this was impossible.

Yesterday the CNE met and came out swinging. and so did Sumate.The CNE said that under no circumstances would the fingerprinte machines not be used, that it was impossible to know the sequence and that this was yet another attack on the institution. But the report of last Wenesday's audit is quite clear: "it is possible to reestablish the sequence in which the votes originate if the flash memory or the hard disks used by the machines are analyzed with a view and recovery tool of the NTFS file system which keeps the information of the moment (time) in which the change to the file was made".

Why the arrogant defenseof the process in the face of a technical report that the President of the CNE likely does not even understand? Why the continuos effort to limit the transparency of the electoral process? If the Governemnt is so popular, why does it have to deny, block, violate the law and limit the verification of the results? Why insist on the use of the fingerprint machines if reportedly the AFIS software (which is supposed to compare them so that nobody votes twice) is reportedly not functioning?

You tell me.

11:28:38 AM    comment []



© Copyright 2007 Satan's Poop Inc. Paila Master. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 4/2/2007; 9:34:16 PM.
Powered by
BloGalaxia

Directory of Politics Blogs