The Devil's Excrement
Observations focused on the problems of an underdeveloped country, Venezuela, with some serendipity about the world (orchids, techs, science, investments, politics) at large. A famous Venezuelan, Juan Pablo Perez Alfonzo, referred to oil as the devil's excrement. For countries, easy wealth appears indeed to be the sure path to failure. Venezuela might be a clear example of that.
Last updated:
8/1/2008; 11:02:00 PM


July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Jun   Aug













Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "The Devil's Excrement" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Satan's Poop Inc. Paila Master:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Thursday, July 10, 2008


The Government seems to have realized the dangers of forcing the banking system to sell the Bolivar denominated notes in the hands of the Venezuelan Financial system all at once and is reconsidering what to do..

Recall that the Government issued a resolution ordering financial institutions to sell all of the Bolivar denominated notes they held, issued by foreign companies and banks. These institutions had set them up in order to bypass the limitation that no bank may have more than 30% of its capital or equity in foreign currency.

The Government had clearly known about the existence of these notes, as most of the banks holding them are considered to be those “close” to the Government, but when the Government realized after the bond issued in May that international markets had little appetite for the country’s debt, someone came up with the idea that if they forced to have banks sell their notes, they would have to sell the US$ bonds in the swap parallel market and forcing the sale, would do the job the Government wanted at no cost.

Except that, the banks had incurred in large losses because most of the dollars for the notes were bought at much higher prices and in many cases, the banks had borrowed against the notes, thus in some instances, the notes were worth essentially nothing.

At this point, Ali Rodriguez was named Minister of Finance. Rodriguez who is practically ignorant on financial matters heard two points of views. One, that from his predecessor and his team that told him this had to be done and even had Rodriguez sign a resolution telling banks they could not sell the notes without approval and; Two, that of the “bankers” who are identified with the regime who were telling him that this could create a financial crisis if banks were forced to sell the notes by August 14th., suggesting some banks could go under.

Rodriguez’ decision was quite amazing for a Government that only a year ago was ready to withdraw from the much hated multilateral organizations: He actually asked the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank to give the country technical advice on the matter during a scheduled visit this week.

What these technical people will find is that six or seven banks are in real trouble, if not bankrupt, and that either the owners capitalize them or the Government will  have to take them over.

What is important here is that the Government should not drag its feet like it does with everything, it should act, ask each bank if their owners are willing to capitalize and if they are not, intervene the banks with open doors. If the Government delays or postpones decisions this could be very bad, because the Government ordered that the balance sheet of banks should reflect the losses in these notes as of June 30th. However, for auditors and accountants there is only one exchange rate: the official one, thus these balance sheets will have losses which are much larger than reality, as these dollars could be sold in the parallel swap market which is 75% higher than the official rate of exchange.

If you think that I am exaggerating, I am not. As of Dec 31st. 2007, there were twelve banks, which had structured notes and for six of them; the value of the notes was at least twice that of the equity or capital of the banks. Thus, if the losses are 50% between the dollars purchase and the underlying bonds purchased, they could have zero capital. In that case, the owners would have to be willing to recapitalize and that is the big if in this equation.

Additional evidence for this, comes from statements made by none other than one of the persons most responsible for the situation former Minister of Finance Rodrigo Cabezas. Cabezas resurfaced the day before yesterday at a TV program in Chavez “official” station VTV. In the interview, Cabezas actually said that maybe three or four institutions might be in trouble, which to me suggests the matter has been discussed. (Cabezas talked about a meeting between the new Minister of Finance and Chavez’ party PSUV on the subject, showing once again that information is only available to Chavez and his party and that half of Venezuela is being discriminated against in that information is being withheld from them)

Now, you have to take anything Cabezas with a grain of salt, because if anything, Cabezas showed during the interview that he has yet to grasp and understand the issue of the structured notes. Said Cabezas:

“It is probable that some banks, maybe three or four, have a large share of its assets in structured notes, which would force the State to do the corresponding evaluation, because it was the State that sold it t them”

Wow! Where should I start? There is very little that is correct in that statement. First of all, former Minister Cabezas makes a an error which proves he does not even understand the issues involved: He mixes up the structured notes sold by the Government which were dollar denominated, with those denominated in Bolivars which have very little to do with the first ones. In fact, it was the banks themselves who set them up independently.Thus he is talking about pears, but the problems are the oranges.

Thus, the State bears no responsibility for selling them to the banks. It only bears responsibility (with Cabezas at the top) for allowing this to happen and grow to unmanageable levels. Second, what matters is not the size of the notes, but the amount of losses these banks may have incurred, Thus, Cabezas’ numbers must be something he heard, more than anything he came up with. My numbers come form detailed examination of the balance sheets of the banks.

But even more remarkably is the fact that in the same interview, Cabezas called the issuing of these notes as "dangerous and inadequate", blaming his predecessors for them, but forgetting that 1) He was Head of the Finance Committee of the National Assembly when most of these notes were set up by the Government and 2) He was Minister of Finance when most of the banks set up the bolivar-denomainted structure Notes that are currently the problem.

Thus, besides the lies and the ignorance that the Government has accustomed us to, there is the irresponsibility of passing the buck and blaming someone else, while it was Cabezas that allowed the Bolivar denominated notes to balloon out of all proportion and create the problem facing the Venezuelan financial system today. The fact that he has yet to understand the problem does not exempt him from being guilty of not fulfilling his obligations as Minister.

And this ignorance and irresponsibility is reflected in the way that Government officials work. They continue to issue resolutions forbidding things that are already not allowed by the Banking Law, the real problem is that regulators have done nothing about it. Banks should sell structured notes, not because there was a resolution saying it, but because banks may only have by law up to 30% of their equity in foreign currency. Thus, banks should not have had them in the first place and the Superintendent of Banks should have told them so. Similarly, issuing a resolution forbidding the purchase of shares of one bank by another or the merger of them, seems superfluous and that seems to be one of the jobs of the regulator, to approve or not the purchase of one bank by another one or their merger.

But Cabezas speaks as if he had been in the opposition for ten years and it was “others’ that were involved in these decisions, which have created a situation which has dangerous undertones unless the Government acts, acts soon and acts efficiently and without a political biased.

All of which seems too much to hope for, given ten years of exactly the opposite.

11:19:30 PM    comment []



© Copyright 2008 Satan's Poop Inc. Paila Master. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 8/1/2008; 11:02:01 PM.
Powered by