The Devil's Excrement





  Venezuela
For those that just want to know about the bizarre, wonderful country of Venezuela and its even more bizarre current Government
Last updated:
4/3/2007; 2:03:10 PM

The 2005 Weblog Awards
August 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Jul   Sep












Google


WWW
The Devil's Excrement


Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Venezuela" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Satan's Poop Inc. Paila Master:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Saturday, August 27, 2005



Another opposition march repressed. A small march, mostly women, had permission from the police and the municipalities to go all the way to the National Assembly to hand in a document about political prisoners. The police blocked the path of the march, pro-Chavez groups attacked and there are six injured two critical.

Once again, the opposition has no possibility of exercizing its rights.

The police and National Guard act against the march.

The President of the Assembly who had guaranteed that they would not be attacked, blames the opposition.

The loyal Chavistas who attacked the march are unharmed and nobody from the Government criticizes them.

Another day in the pretty revolution!

(Meanwhile pro-Chavez groups are free to roam in Bolivar Square protesting against Pat Robertson, obviously they did not need a permit)


5:06:23 PM    comment []


As a public service to the revolution I will explain a corrupt practice in detail, maybe one of the readers knows someone in power who can explain it to someone in power or the Comptroller and something may be done about it.


OK, let’s start at the beginning with the hints that something funny is going on:


Hint #1: In 1998, official deposits, that is deposits from all Government institutions, in the banking system were about 1% of all monetary liquidity (all the bolivars in the financial system).


Hint #2: According to the monthly banking report which you can get in Reporte Diario de La Economia from July 22nd., official deposits in the banking system are today Bs. 14.54 billions (in Spanish) or Bs. 14.54 trillion in English, or just so you can see all the zeroes:


Bs. 14,547,270,000,000 (US$ 6.76 billion)


Or 1.4547 10+13 in scientific notation. We are not talking “millardos”, we are talking “millones de millardos”.

Now, go the Central Bank pages, go to statistical information, go to monetary aggregates (weekly), there you find what monetary liquidity is and couple of weeks ago it was:


Bs. 50.73 trillions (US$ 23.6 billion)


Thus, the Government has 28.6% of the monetary liquidity deposited in the private banking system. Why the increase from 1% to 28.6% since 1998? Does it make any sense?


Additionally, there are official deposits that do not appear in the balance sheets of banks. They occur when a bank “transfers” an investment to a public institution, with an agreement to buy it back. These are not even taken into account in our argument and discussions.


Hint #3: Public institutions get their budget every month. Thus, they should get 8.33% of their budget each month. Therefore they all have, on average, 3.4 months of “savings” in the bank, rather than spending it on the “people”, “the revolution”, “social programs” and the like. Why do public institutions keep that money in the bank? Another thing that does not amke sense.


Hint #4: Look at the banks’ official deposits. There are 37 commercial banks in Venezuela. Two are Government owned. Of all banks, 16 have percentages of official deposits that are above the national average of 28.6% of the monetary liquidity. Three have double the national average, with one as high as having 77% of its deposits as official deposits. None of these are official banks, they are all private.


Hint #6: How can it make sense for the Government to issue local debt in Bolivars at a certain interest rate, so that the Government can pay the monthly budget of its own institutions, which simply turn around and deposit their money, which I assume has a purpose, in commercial banks to get a lower interest rate than that paid by the Government?


Let me explain this with a diagram what I am saying:


The Government ( Doric building on the left) issues a bond (document above) that pays let’s say 18% interest per year, the bank (tall modern building) buys it, gets that 18% and pays a Government institution 10% interest, (on the right in blue) for having its deposits in it.


But see the problem? The Government is paying the banks 18%, so that it can pay Government instituions 10-12% for depositing tehir money. Weird no?


Sound fishy? You bet it is. Let’s make the explanation very graphical. How does a bank usually work?


The bank lends money (on the left) to someone charging them 18% interest (this is called a loan), from which it pays the depositor 10-12% on the right (in a CD, for example). The problem is that the balance is never perfect, banks do not (can not) lend all the money they have, so they also buy Government or private bonds to pay depositors with the interest they get. They also keep some cash at hand.


The problem is that because of the lack of investment in Venezuela in the last eight years, credit demand has been very low and banks typically have four to five times more deposits than loans. So, what to do with the excess money?


Well, typically if banks have too much excess money, interest rates go down and credit demand increases. Or private companies issue more bonds. Or the Government issues more bonds. In Venezuela it has been the Government issuing more bonds in the last few years, so that it can spend more. But, as explained above it is very inefficient and that goes to the heart of the matter of this post.


You see, it does not make any sense that 28.6 % of banks deposits are official deposits. That means that the Government pays 2.6 trillion Bs. (US$ 1.2 billion) to banks so that they can pay the Government institutions 1.4 trillion (US$ 615 million). Absurd, no? You bet, somebody pockets the difference.


The key is that difference between the two, those 1.2 trillion Bs. or US$ 500 million. In the middle are the banks that make part of that money, Government officials that get paid commissions to deposit their money in certain banks and some “intermediaries” that get paid to “find” those deposits for the banks. Nice corruption racket, no?

This obviously does not make sense, but it continues and even grows as time goes by. The “profits” have gone down as the spreads (or difference) between the rate paid by the bonds and that paid to deposits has shrunk. But if that spread is today 6-8%, for two or three years from 2001-2004 it was more closer to 10-14%, or around US$ 1 billion per year.


Obviously not all of the official deposits move under commissions, there are banks that don’t pay them, for example, but a big chunk is corruption related. Since we are talking about some US$ 4 billion in the last four years, think about what that means if only one third of the money moves on the basis of commission. These are some very rich crooks indeed.


Now, Government officials know this, so obviously the money is being spread around widely to sustain the system. Thus, I was quite pleased to hear that the Government was going to start a “Banco del Tesoro” or Treasury Bank that would act as a payment agent for the Government and eliminate this racket. Well, the idea does not appear to be as pure as I thought. According to the announcement by Government officials, the Banco del Tesoro will be a commercial bank that will compete with the private banking system and act as payment agent for the Government. But official deposits will still exist and the Banco del Tesoro will buy Government bonds much like any other bank. So, you have to wonder if all they are doing is simply centralizing this corruption racket, so that a few can benefit from it.


Stopping all this is actually quite easy: i) Streamline payments to Government institutions so that you don’t advance to them more than one month of their budget at a time, ii) Have them have accounts at Government banks which bear no interest or iii) simply have the Government issue payments directly. (This is the way it is done in the
US and most of the world, institutions ask the Treasury for payment and you get a check directly from the Government’s Treasury)

Neither of these three appears to be in the works at this time. You be the judge. 


12:36:51 AM    comment []



© Copyright 2007 Satan's Poop Inc. Paila Master. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 4/3/2007; 2:04:31 PM.
Powered by
BloGalaxia

Directory of Politics Blogs