Critiques of Editorials
a weblog devoted to short-but-sweet criticisms of political editorials.

 


My Favorite Blogs

Link Pages for News Stories

My Favorite 'Zines

Opinion Pages of Newspapers

Archive of Editorial Critiques


Subscribe to "Critiques of Editorials" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Saturday, August 24, 2002


Gallup poll details on Presidential Approval raises lots of questions
I have never understood why Dubya's approval rating is so high.  Gallup recently released a new presidential approval poll that shows Dubya's approval at 65%.  On the page of the press release, there is a graph that shows how Dubya's approval has tracked over time by political party (Republicans, Democrats, Independent).  Prior to 9/11, all three groups had relatively consistent levels of support for Dubya - the Republicans in the 85-95% range, the Independents in the 45-60% range and the Democrats in the 25-35% range.  After 9/11, Dubya's support shot up to ~82% from the Democrats, ~87% from the Independents and and ~97% from the Republicans.

Challenge time - how do you think Dubya's support trended since 9/11 by party?  Where do you think the support by party is now relative to prior to 9/11?  My guess was that all three groups would trend downward, with the Democrats having the sharpest trend and the Republicans the shallowest, and that all there groups would be 5-10% above their pre-9/11 levels.  Come up with your guess.  I'll give you a hint - my guess is wrong.  Once you have your guess click here and page down.

As you can see, the Democrats and Independents have trended down with close to the same slope.  As a consequence, Independents have a level of approval (56%) comparable to a couple of weeks before 9/11, but the Democrats have a level of approval (50%) well above their pre-9/11 level.  Republicans have no downward trend - their level of approval has stayed in the mid-90's since 9/11.

This raises lots of questions for me - why hasn't Dubya's approval from Democrats dropped more sharply than that from Independents?  There is only a 6% difference now compared to ~20% before 9/11.  Why is the Republican support steady?  Surely Republicans also have had a hard time finding jobs, have had their retirement portfolios better, have seen reports that crime is up and huge deficits are back?  Does Bush's position on a few key issues such as taxes, gun and abortion trump any questions about how the country is doing?  Knowing a little more shows me how little I do know.


7:13:07 PM    comment []

Why the Oregon fire damage photo-op is so ironic
Back in April, 2001, Dubya didn't go to see the crew of the spy plane when they returned to the US.  Michael Kelly wrote "Finally, a President who doesn't exploit the victim."  Cal Thomas wrote "Following a gregarious and seemingly omnipresent Bill Clinton, George W. Bush presents himself publicly only when he thinks it's necessary. He limits his exposure as one might horde food or energy, but for different reasons. Bush seems to view his office as something to be used for the good of others, not self-aggrandizement."  Back in those early days, back when the Dubya's administration's attitude was that adults are finally back in control, Dubya was above photo-ops for self-aggrandizement.  Now, he is doing little else.
10:30:03 AM    comment []

The WP has a good piece on our government's hypocrisy and the illegal imprisonment of two Americans.
8:12:44 AM    comment []



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2002 Unrelated Disney.
Last update: 9/1/2002; 9:33:23 AM.

August 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jul   Sep