Critiques of Editorials
a weblog devoted to short-but-sweet criticisms of political editorials.

 



My Best Posts

Archives
My Favorite Blogs

Link Pages for News Stories

My Favorite 'Zines

Opinion Pages of Newspapers

Resources

Archive of Editorial Critiques


Subscribe to "Critiques of Editorials" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Thursday, September 12, 2002


More Republican Theater of the Absurd
From an AP storyon Yahoo:
Republicans yanked a radio ad Thursday that was aimed at black voters in Kansas and Missouri comparing Social Security benefits to slavery reparations — except paid to whites by blacks.

It was the latest skirmish in a multistate war over Social Security ads pegged to November's congressional elections.

The commercial was paid for by a Republican interest group and aired in the Kansas City area on an urban contemporary station whose listeners are predominantly black. GOPAC, which is headed by Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating, said the ad was a mistake and withdrew it Thursday after calls from reporters and protests from an anti-privatization group.

"You've heard about reparations, you know, where whites compensate blacks for enslaving us," the ad says. "Well guess what we've got now. Reverse reparations." The commercial says blacks earn thousands of dollars less in retirement benefits than whites because they have shorter life spans.

"So the next time some Democrat says he won't touch Social Security, ask why he thinks blacks owe reparations to whites," the ad says.

GOPAC spokesman Mike Tuffin said his committee is working with a local media company, Access Communications, which mistakenly gave the ad to KPRS-FM as one of several targeting black voters.

"We disavow it and have seen to it that it was immediately pulled," Tuffin said. "We did not know it was going to be run and never intended it to be run."

NAACP Chairman Julian Bond said, "To believe that broadcasting these falsehoods in such a racially colored way aimed at African American voters, obviously thinking they'd buy it hook, line and sinker, is insulting."

Former Kansas City Mayor Emanuel Cleaver said Keating should apologize for his organization.

"No one should realize more than Governor Keating the need for people to rally together in this nation after a tragedy," he said. "The people giving them direction on this are so out of touch with black people that the ads are subliminally saying to black folks, 'Don't join the Republican Party.'"

It's not the only dispute over Social Security ads. In other cases:

_ A Social Security ad in West Virginia also is stirring anger, this time from the GOP. Rep. Shelley Moore Capito has demanded that Democrats stop airing a television ad claiming she voted against an attempt to "protect Social Security from privatization" because she says it is false. The Democrats have refused, but four stations said Thursday they would not use the ad. Democrats said other stations continued to air it.

_ When Minnesota Democrats recently began running radio ads accusing John Kline of seeking to "end Social Security as we know it," the Republican congressional candidate and his allies fought back, though so far unsuccessfully. Kline wrote stations, asking them to stop running the ad on grounds it was false. A Washington-based lawyer followed up, raising the possibility of a lawsuit.

Democrats have identified Social Security as a core campaign issue that they think can help them regain control of the House. They have been criticizing President Bush's plan to overhaul Social Security by letting younger workers invest a portion of their payroll taxes in the stock market.

The Kansas City ad said Bush's proposed changes would help blacks by giving them higher benefits with "real financial assets."

The ad "is incredibly patronizing in so many ways," said Hans Riemer, senior analyst for Campaign for America's Future, an anti-privatization group that first raised questions about it.

The radio station broadcasts in an area featuring a contested race between two-term Democratic Rep. Dennis Moore and a political newcomer, Republican pilot Adam Taff. Taff recently hired a new strategist, Joe Gaylord, who had been a consultant for GOPAC.

Taff said there was no connection between his campaign and the ad. "Nothing could be farther from the truth," he said.

Moore's campaign spokesman, Jack Martin, said: "It's reprehensible that they're misleading voters about Social Security with these ads."

The station's sales contract shows GOPAC paid about $5,000 for ads, which were to air four times daily from Sept. 3-6 and also Monday through Sept. 22. It lists Richard Nadler as the contact at Access Communications.

Nadler was criticized in 2000 for an ad featuring a woman saying she had put her son in a private school because drugs and violence at his public school were "a bit more diversity than he could handle." The ad urged voters to support Republicans, but leading GOP candidates denounced it.

It is hilarious to not only hear the Republican candidate who has close ties with GOPAC deny any involvement with the ad, but also GOPAC deny involvement with an ad that they created and paid for.


6:47:42 PM    comment []

Our Brilliant Foreign Policy in Action
In the AP story on Arafat's cabinet resigning:
The setting of an election date came as something of a surprise. The United States had been seeking a delay to gain time to find ways of diminishing Arafat's position. President Bush has urged the Palestinians to elect a new leadership.

One floated proposal calls for appointment of a prime minister who would run day-to-day affairs, while Arafat would be turned into a figurehead. While the Palestinian leader earlier appeared to be considering the idea, in recent days he has blocked all efforts to bring it about.

A U.S. official said Wednesday that the United States supported the Palestinians' right to choose their own leader, but suggested the elections were coming too soon. "We think the ground has to be prepared before that (elections)," said Paul Patin, spokesman at the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv.

It is widely assumed that the earlier the elections are held, the greater Arafat's chances of winning re-election.

While many Palestinians find fault with Arafat, they say they resent U.S. efforts to try to push him aside and will not accept meddling in their affairs.

Dubya has been calling for a change in the Palestinian leadership for months.  Now that elections are announced, we are unprepared?!?  It doesn’t sound like we have a slate to support or anything resembling a plan.  All Dubya’s calls for new leadership has done is to make it EASIER for Arafat to win again.  Once again, Dubya will be reduced to saying that a democratically elected leader is not fit to lead his people.

One of the arguments for invading Iraq is that we will replace the dictatorship there with a democracy, and from that, democracy will sweep the Middle East.  This seems to imply that once the Middle East has democratic governments, all of our problems with the Middle East will be over.  The people who make that argument ignore that of the three governments in the Middle East that we have the most trouble with (Palestine, Iran and Iraq), one has a democratic government and another has democratic elections.  Until the US pursues policies and actions that win the hearts of the people of the Middle East, any democratic government there will be hostile to the US.


6:34:10 PM    comment []

Latest Inductee into the Poor Taste Hall of Fame
"What is it with Democrats having a hard time voting -- I don't know," Bush said.
6:51:00 AM    comment []



Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2002 Unrelated Disney.
Last update: 10/1/2002; 10:10:37 PM.

September 2002
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Aug   Oct