Fried Green al-Qaedas



  Fried Green al-Qaedas
Last updated:
8/12/2005; 9:27:42 AM


May 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
Apr   Jun

----
Still There is More
-----
Live on Regis!


Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Fried Green al-Qaedas" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Mark Hoback:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Saturday, May 21, 2005

White House: Latest Pictures 'Just Ludicrous'

The Bush administration issued a statement late this afternoon declaring the latest pictures of Saddam Hussein featured in Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper 'The Sun' to be 'obviously a forgery, some kind of photo manipulation, but hilarious nonetheless'.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan told a gaggle of reporters that the administration had originally been concerned that the photos of Saddam in his Fruit of the Loom's would cause demoralization among American serviceman, as their drawers were 'not nearly as nice'.

"But that", said McClellan, "was before we had intelligence take a closer look. There is no way that Saddam could get his... wait a second - are those butt pads? Hahahaha, Saddams got butt pads! And skidmarks! Hahahaha, hee hee, oh man, no further questions."


6:32:35 PM    comment []

Blogger Uses Nuclear Option on PC

FGAQ is tempted - very tempted - to write at length about all the terrible things which befell the corporate computer over the past few days, but that would be wrong. And boring. As much as we poke merciless fun at those who write of such matters, it is not even an option to say anything other than we regret that we were unable to be in the forefront of the courageous bloggers who have already brought you multitudinous pictures of Saddam without his pants.


12:33:51 PM    comment []

'NEWSWEEK Dissembled, Muslims Dismembered! Wait -that doesn't make any sense'
Ann Coulter (Archive)

May 19, 2005 | printer friendly version Print | email to a friend Send



 

When ace reporter Michael Isikoff had the scoop of the decade - because really, what else was happening - a thoroughly soused story about the president of the United States having his knob polished by an unpleasantly plump intern and then pressuring her to lie about it under oath, is it any wonder that Newsweek just up and decided not to run the story? I think not. My friend, Matt Drudge, one of the most respected names in journalism, scooped Newsweek. Ha! His Pulitzer for that piece stood as the first shot across the bow of the sinking ship of the main street liberal media.

So then Isikoff comes up with a detailed account of Kathleen Willey's nasty sexual encounter with Willie's willie in the Ovum Orifice, backed up with eyewitness and documentary evidence, Newsweek decided not to run it. Again, Matt Drudge got the story, along with his second Pulitzer.

When Isikoff was (again!) the first with detailed reporting on Paula Jones' accusations against the horndog-in-chief, Newsweek once again decided not to run it. The American Spectacle got the story, followed by me, followed by Drudge. Ha, ha, Matt. You can't win em all. And Isikoff can’t win any of them! You’d think if he had even a lick of self-respect, he would have found another job.

All of which is to point out that it's possible for Michael Isikoff to have a story that actually is true, but for his editors not to run it. And it is also a great opportunity for me to bring up my arch-nemesis, the scumbag known as Willie.

Why no pause for reflection when Isikoff had a story about American interrogators at Guantanamo flushing the Quran down the toilet like some soiled Clinton hanky? (A panky hanky, if you know what I mean). Why not sit on this story for, say, even half as long as NBC News sat on Lisa Meyers' highly credible account of Clinton raping Juanita Broaddrick? Sure, our first presidential rapist since FDR, and him you're going to protect.

Newsweek is going to change its name to Newsgeek. I just thought that up and called Matt and told him, but he told me he was on hold with the dog face lady from al-Jazeera, which I believed at first, but Jeez, dog face lady doesn't even show up in my Lexus-Nexus unless I pair it with Hillary, and even then, it only gives me two sources. (Maybe he meant Helen Thomas. I’ll call him back.)

Who's deciding which of Isikoff's stories to run and which to hold? I note that the ones that Matt Drudge runs have turned out to be a whole lot more accurate -- and interesting! -- and hot! --than the ones Newsweek runs. Maybe Newsweek should start running everything past Matt Drudge. I know I do. I got this little see-through chemise type top in aqua, and ran it past Matt, and he didn't notice, so I ran over his stupid Bassett hound that just sits like an idiot in his driveway, and he still didn't notice, so I dressed up like Mamie Eisenhower, and he still didn't notice, so I got Sammy Hager to do a mariachi kind of thing in front of his house, and he got a restraining order.  

It seems so long ago that I first wrote about serial rapist Bill Clinton, the man who put my name on the map, which is the only good thing he ever did except for murdering Vince Foster, who was a load and a half if you really got to know him, which I didn’t of course, but Shelly Ethridge did, and for her troubles he raped her but not nearly with the compassion of a Big Willie rape, because truth be told, the man was a very good rapist which is why he never got caught other than by me and Matt, although of course congress was suspicious enough to impeach him, and yet, there he was in office two years later. I wish Clinton was still in Newsweek.

Well, he’s not, and neither is the story from a few weeks ago about Saudi Arabia arresting 40 Christians for "trying to spread their poisonous religious beliefs." What happened next? Were they thrown to the camels with jelly on their feet and sharp tailed Arabian ants in their pants while Saudis ate honeyed dates and laughed? I don’t know. I looked in Newsweek and couldn’t find out. But on the other hand, give the liberal media a story about American interrogators defacing the Quran, and journalists are so appalled that they soil their britches in righteous indignation -- before they dash off to see the latest exhibition of "Piss Christ." Okay, I don’t even know if that’s still being displayed, but it still pisses me off. (Pardon the word play!) Like a crucifix in a mason jar full of urine is art? Oh my god, I’ll bet my turd in a punchbowl piece is priceless.

Ironically, among the reasons Newsweek gave for killing Isikoff's Lewinsky bombshell was that their cowardly cretin of an editor was worried someone might get hurt. I am not kidding you – that’s what they said, at least according to Matt, and Matt is just the cutest thing, I like to pinch his cheeks and go ‘woogie woogie woogie’ He said that the editor said that Lewinsky said that if the story comes out, "I'll fucking kill myself." See, that’s the sort of gutter talking big butt girl that Bill Clinton liked to torpedo.

Newsweek couldn't wait to run a story that everybody with any sense knew would send the Islamic savages into murderous riots in Afghanistan. Tell me again why I should care, as long as they’re just killing themselves. These are people who stone rape victims to death because the family "honor" has been violated? My dog is more human than that and I don’t even have a dog, much the way that Bill Clinton didn’t even have a conscience, which of course he did, it was just a bad conscience, much the way my dog is a bad dog, and yet is still more human than the sort of people who would stone an innocent rape victim. Even Bill Clinton wouldn’t have stoned an innocent rape victim, although I’m sure that he got stoned with plenty of them.

Come to think of it, which is what I’m doing right now, I don’t know that I’m all that upset about Newsweek inciting violence among people who view ancient Buddhist statues as something more than lawn ornaments, and like to fly planes into American skyscrapers. Maybe we should just start making up these stories and film the carnage afterwards for reality TV. Okay, Newsweek, you did good this time, even though you haven’t had me on the cover like TIME, but then on the other hand, you didn’t do a lousy cover shot like TIME, so that’s a wash. But I’m just warning you hear ahead of time (ahead of TIME!), I’m not committing unless you get me Annie Leibowitz.


12:13:26 PM    comment []



© Copyright 2005 Mark Hoback. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 8/12/2005; 9:27:42 AM.
Powered by