Water Gate Not
Fait Accompli
Frank J
Rutherford
September 19,
2005 |
Print |
Send
There's no depths to which the libelous left will not
stoop to in their effort to besmirch the noble name of the national nabob,
as the bathroom permission note scandal resoundingly makes clear. There is
nothing that the secularist zombies of bottomless venom would love more than
to link the nation's mental image of George W Bush to a golden arc of
steaming urine.
In this effort, they shall not succeed. Oh yes, we may
have to endure a few more 'water gate' jokes, but ultimately the truth
surrounding this massively immoral malignment may prove to be the final nail
in the coffin of the mainstream media moguls, already standing up to their
necks and beyond in the stinking urinal of Aulde Laddie Rue.
Phony? Manipulative? Just look at the caption which Reuters originally
assigned to the doctored photo:
U.S. President George 'Goo Goo' Bush writes
a note to Secretary of State Condie-wondie Rice during a Security Council
meeting at the 60th General Assembly of the United Nations. World leaders
are exploring ways to revitalize the United Nations at a summit on
Wednesday but the Big Baby in Chief couldn't pay attention because he
needed to take a wee-wee.
With such an inflammatory
caption being provided by the secular media, one would come away with the
impression that George Bush cared more about the needs of his bladder that
he did about revitalizing the UN.
Scurrilously potty-mouthed
propaganda? You bet. The answer would certainly appear to be yes for
Democrat National Chair Howard Dean, who describes the note as the throbbing
gun in the Bush agenda, and calls the event 'the best piece of news we've
had since Katrina'. Well, if Howard endorses it, then level-headed Americans
should treat the event like Superman treats those glowing green rocks that
seem to be in such plentiful supply on planet earth. For goodness sake, you
can't take a walk around the block in Metropolis without tripping over a
piece of Kryptonite.
Was this note in fact written by
two different people? The first part of the note has the text "condi - if I
dont get to the john in about 5 minutes we're talking about" written in a 22
point mistral script, while the other phrase, which reads "massive flooding.
Get me", is in a completely different writing style. Why would Bush do such
a thing? Why would any sane president, in an urgent need to drain the
donkey, indulge in two distinctly separate scripts? Why, such a man would be
mad, which would appear to be precisely the message intended by the
perpetrators of this hoax.
Handwriting experts opine that
the second portion of the note, which contains the words "massive flooding",
are the genuine words of the chief executive, noting that the message was
written on September 14th, around the same time that Bush found about the
crisis in New Orleans. Furthermore, according to White House press secretary
Scott McClellan, the president never refers to the lavatory as 'the john',
preferring instead the phrases 'the can', 'the pisser', and 'the tinkle
tinkle ha-ha room'.
Clearly the loony left was a
willing victim to the Reuters hoax, but it should be obvious to all but the
most Kool Aid crazed lib that such blatant manipulation does nothing but
weaken the American image at home and abroad. Perhaps it is in some way true
that the president, on occasion, sails the lazy river, but that is surely
more than America needs to know. |
