I'm currently taking advantage of the tuition waiver benefit at Hamline University to take a Master of Arts in Liberal Studies, studying part-time.
It's a very interesting class. I've started thinking about what I'll do for my first assignment. The general topic is anything to do with changing values in civilization.
I think that I might write about changing values and copyright law. I would like to explore how copyright law has not kept up with changes in society's values - of course copyright law is not the only area of law to do this.
Here a few things I might explore: how international copyright regimes are an colonialist anachronism in this so-called post-colonialist age; how there seems to be a disconnect between the public's definitions of stealing/piracy and the content business' (interestingly, 19th century American readers of English novels were in an analogous situation to today's music downloaders); how creator-focused movements such as open source and moral rights might supplement or undermine today's publisher-focused copyright law.
I'm definitely going to have to narrow my topic to something more specific, but these are the general ideas that I'm mulling over.
I've just started reading Copyrights and Copywrongs by Siva Vaidhyanathan (NY University Press, 2001). It's a very interesting read.
On page 29, the author mentions the idea/expression dichotomy and that Kirsch's Handbook of Publishing Law for Authors, Publishers, Editors, and Agents recommends copyright owners use contract law for the protection of ideas.
On page 17, the author quotes the standard warning announced in Major League Baseball games: "No pictures, descriptions, or accounts of this game may be rebroadcast without the expressed written consent of the Office of the Commissioner of Major League Baseball [dear old Bud, whom I hope is embarrassed by the success of the cash-strapped & contraction-targetted Minnesota Twins in winning their division]." (my comments!)
Vaidhyanathan then comments on this: "there is no legal authority which could or would stop the first fan from writing a detailed description or account of the game and sending it via e-mail to the other [fan]. ... Whenever Americans encounter legal language, there is the distinct possibility that they will believe whatever it commands. Major League Baseball is taking liberties, and therefore we are losing them."
12:45:37 PM
|