Playing with my food, and other things...
Quarry not prey
Last updated:
2/4/2007; 4:59:06 AM


November 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            
Oct   Dec

Some Recipes
Salon Locus Focus
More Food Blogs
Weird Food Sources

Paul/Male/56-60. Lives in United States/North Carolina/Carrboro, speaks English. Eye color is brown. I am skinny. I am also cynical. My interests are All Music/All Food.
This is my blogchalk:
United States, North Carolina, Carrboro, English, Paul, Male, 56-60, All Music, All Food.

< £ Salon Bloggers & >

The WeatherPixie Listed on
BlogShares


Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Playing with my food, and other things..." in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author,

Paul Hinrichs:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

Wednesday, November 05, 2003

A picture named confederate.jpg

Here’s my idea to end the Confederate Flag controversy once and for all. It’s been nearly 140 years since the South lost the Civil War and some people have forgotten what the flag stood for.

 

Basically, despite all the revisionist bullshit about Hamiltonian concepts and romantic architectural musings about Natchez, Mississippi, the South wanted to continue exploiting and trading slaves. That’s right, they believed it was okay to kidnap, imprison, beat, and humiliate other human beings just to pick their friggin’ cotton.

 

They fired on Fort Sumter in a ceremonial beginning to America’s bloodiest war. They won a few battles, fought the good fight yada-yada-yada, but, in the end, they got their ass kicked. That’s right, the South LOST the Civil War.

 

So, my addition to the Confederate Flag commemorates this loss. The big L stands for LOSER. If you wanna fly this flag on your Statehouse, build monuments to it, put on the rear window of your pickup, or even tattoo it on your grandma’s ass, go right ahead. We don’t care, as long as you remember that YOU LOST.


6:29:32 PM    comment []

But he never used the expression “imminent threat” – aha, Gotcha!

Neener! Neener! Neener! Nannie-Nannie-Boo-Boo! Liberals Stepped In Poo-Poo!

Excerpt from the 2003 State Of The Union address:

The United Nations concluded in 1999 that Saddam Hussein had biological weapons sufficient to produce over 25,000 liters of anthrax -- enough doses to kill several million people. He hasn't accounted for that material. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed it.

The United Nations concluded that Saddam Hussein had materials sufficient to produce more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin -- enough to subject millions of people to death by respiratory failure. He hadn't accounted for that material. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed it.

Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. In such quantities, these chemical agents could also kill untold thousands. He's not accounted for these materials. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents. Inspectors recently turned up 16 of them -- despite Iraq's recent declaration denying their existence. Saddam Hussein has not accounted for the remaining 29,984 of these prohibited munitions. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

From three Iraqi defectors we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs. These are designed to produce germ warfare agents, and can be moved from place to a place to evade inspectors. Saddam Hussein has not disclosed these facilities. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb. The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide.

The dictator of Iraq is not disarming. To the contrary; he is deceiving. From intelligence sources we know, for instance, that thousands of Iraqi security personnel are at work hiding documents and materials from the U.N. inspectors, sanitizing inspection sites and monitoring the inspectors themselves. Iraqi officials accompany the inspectors in order to intimidate witnesses.

Iraq is blocking U-2 surveillance flights requested by the United Nations. Iraqi intelligence officers are posing as the scientists inspectors are supposed to interview. Real scientists have been coached by Iraqi officials on what to say. Intelligence sources indicate that Saddam Hussein has ordered that scientists who cooperate with U.N. inspectors in disarming Iraq will be killed, along with their families.

Year after year, Saddam Hussein has gone to elaborate lengths, spent enormous sums, taken great risks to build and keep weapons of mass destruction. But why? The only possible explanation, the only possible use he could have for those weapons, is to dominate, intimidate, or attack.

With nuclear arms or a full arsenal of chemical and biological weapons, Saddam Hussein could resume his ambitions of conquest in the Middle East and create deadly havoc in that region. And this Congress and the America people must recognize another threat. Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. Secretly, and without fingerprints, he could provide one of his hidden weapons to terrorists, or help them develop their own.

Before September the 11th, many in the world believed that Saddam Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents, lethal viruses and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons and other plans -- this time armed by Saddam Hussein. It would take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known. We will do everything in our power to make sure that that day never comes. (Applause.)


4:48:41 PM    comment []

A picture named 6 kinds of lobster tail.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  1. North Australian
  2. Caribbean
  3. Maine
  4. South African
  5. New Zealand
  6. West Australian

 

Varieties of lobster tails, as pictured in the December 2003 issue of Cuisine at Home. Nicest feature of this magazine are the punched holes making it easy to put into a 3-ring binder. I know I say that every time I mention this magazine, but even if it didn’t have them it would still be one of my favorites. It is similar in concept to Cooks’ Illustrated in that a lot of attention is paid to the details of preparation and there is an abundance of tips from readers as well.

 

This issue’s cover feature is Beef Wellington. There’s also a Pork Wellington recipe, butter pecan tartlets, chicken lollipops, chimichurri meatballs, and two kinds of Baked Alaska. A thin magazine at 44 pages, but there is no advertising.


11:39:58 AM    comment []



© Copyright 2007 Paul Hinrichs. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 2/4/2007; 4:59:07 AM.
Powered by