Robert's Virtual Soapbox
Hey, fellow moonbat, have you had your wingnut blood today?
Last updated:
4/25/2006; 12:01:49 AM


August 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Jul   Sep



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Robert's Virtual Soapbox" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Robert Crook:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Wednesday, August 06, 2003

Syndicated columnist Arianna Huffington speaks to supporters in Los Angeles August 6, 2003, as she announces that she will be an independent candidate for governor of California in the upcoming recall election set for October 7. Huffington made the announcement at A Place Called Home, a facility that works with at-risk children in South Los Angeles. REUTERS/Fred Prouser Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger discusses his plans for his campaign after he announced that he will be a candidate for governor of California, during his appearance on 'The Tonight Show with Jay Leno' on August 6, 2003. Schwarzenegger ended weeks of speculation about his candidacy in this highly publicized appearance. (Fred Prouser/Reuters)

Arianna Huffington (left) announces in South Los Angeles today that she is an independent candidate to replace California Gov. Gray Davis if voters recall him in October or March. Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger (right) announces during today's taping of "The Tonight Show" that he also will seek the California governorship, sophisticatedly "calling it the toughest [decision] he's made since deciding to get a bikini wax in 1978," according to the Associated Press.

Arianna for governor (for now)

Non-Californians -- hell, even Californians -- must think that California truly is the Land of Fruits and Nuts. Hustler publisher Larry Flynt and testosterone-movie actor Arnold Schwarzenegger want to be governor. And progressive columnist and author Arianna Huffington, too.

But let's not forget history, folks: The Republicans started this recall. The Republicans, who can't win an election the old-fashioned way: By winning the most number of votes in a regularly scheduled election.

They have to have a Katherine Harris rig the election for them, or they have to pull redistricting shenanigans, or they have to abuse the recall process. (Ethically, the recall process should be used when a governor is guilty of serious wrongdoing or is otherwise unfit for office; but legally, there was nothing to stop California Republicans from orchestrating the recall of Gov. Gray Davis because their lame excuse for a candidate, Bill Simon, lost to Davis in November. California Republicans should have nominated former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan, who could have beaten Davis, but they didn't because Riordan isn't enough of a right-wing nutjob for them, so they lost to Davis. Now, they want a do-over.)

As the Republican Party dies because demographic shifts in the United States no longer support its racist/Anglophilic, patriarchal/misogynistic, homophobic, xenophobic, warmongering, planet-killing, plutocratic platform, we can expect such desperate acts from the Republicans as stolen elections (we especially have to be vigilant over the computerization of the ballot), coup attempts via redistricting and bullshit recalls.

But we progressives need to realize that the Republicans are doing these things because they are weak and because they are afraid because they are weak. Now is not the time for us to give up; now is the time for us to be as aggressive against the Republicans as they have been against us progressives, especially now that they are so weak.

With this in mind, I support Arianna Huffington's candidacy in the recall of Gov. Gray Davis. I even donated $25 to her campaign today. Why the apparent 180-degree change within 24 hours? Well, things are happening very quickly here in California, like a series of little earthquakes that are threatening to change the face of the state for good or for ill.

Here's how the recall election -- which is scheduled for Oct. 7, but, if the California Supreme Court so rules, will be held in March -- is going to work (as of this writing, anyway): The first part of the recall ballot will be "yes" or "no"; should Davis be recalled or not? The second part of the recall ballot will be a list of the gubernatorial candidates who qualified to appear on the ballot (the California Constitution prohibits Davis from being listed among the replacement candidates).

If the majority of California voters decide that Davis should not be recalled, then he finishes his term -- assuming that there is not yet another recall attempt (as The Homeless Leftists, who are up on the California recall, state, if this recall fails, Davis could be recalled again in another six months; no good reason is needed, just the number of recall-petition signatures that the law requires).

If the majority of voters decide that Davis should be recalled, then whichever candidate gets the most votes -- even if his or her percentage of the votes is a single digit -- becomes California's new governor. (Unless the California Supreme Court decides that, per the California Constitution, the lieutenant governor automatically will replace Davis if the voters decide to recall him, which seems highly unlikely.)

With his approval rating well below 50 percent, there is a very good chance that the California voters will vote to recall Davis. If they do, I don't want to be stuck with a Gov. Flynt or Gov. Schwarzenegger or anyone else who thinks that the governorship of California is no big deal, that you can just walk onto the job, say, after you've established a porn empire or starred in a trilogy of science-fiction movies about mean robots from the future, because hey, becoming governor is the next logical step, right? The governorship of California is not a fucking joke. It is the highest state office in the most populous state of the nation.

Of those who have announced their candidacy in the recall thus far, Arianna Huffington is progressives' best bet. Yes, I wish that she had held public office before. Call me old-fashioned, but I tend to believe that a governor should have been a state or U.S. senator or representative or at least a mayor or have held some fairly important elected office for at least one term. I've had bosses who didn't know what my job was like, and therefore as leaders they were disasters.

However, Arianna has been writing columns and books about the political process for years now; she's no stranger to the political process.

I had already donated $25 to her online today before I learned via the Internet that Schwarzenegger is running -- it had been reported that he was leaning against running, so I really didn't think that he would -- but when I learned that Schwarzenegger will be a candidate, my support for Arianna solidified. No way in hell will Arnold Fucking Schwarzenegger become governor of California without my having done what I could (legally) to have prevented it.

Schwarzenegger's decision to run is another stupid Republican tactical error. As I wrote, the Republicans stupidly picked Simon instead of Riordan in their gubernatorial primary. Riordan is a very rare Republican for whom I could see myself voting. Simon, on the other hand, in what I call "Photogate," shortly before the gubernatorial election in November falsely accused Davis of having illegally accepted a campaign contribution inside the state Capitol building. (It is illegal to accept a campaign contribution on state property.) The photograph that Simon exhibited as "proof" was quickly and easily shown to have been taken inside a private residence, not inside the state Capitol. And Simon was a prosecutor. That he can show his face again in public -- he has been talking about running in the recall -- is proof of his stupidity and of his colossal ego.

Riordan has been saying that if Schwarzenegger runs in the recall, he will not. If Riordan indeed does not run in the recall and Schwarzenegger is the Republican Party's best offering, that means that once again, the California Republican Party blew it by not fronting Riordan. "Polls have shown Riordan would be a stronger candidate [than Schwarzenegger]," the Associated Press reports. It seems to me that the California Republican leadership -- if such a thing exists -- should have pressured Schwarzenegger not to run and pressured Riordan to run. (How many recalls will it take, I wonder, before the Republicans realize that Riordan is the best thing they have going for them?)

I can't see Schwarzenegger winning the recall. It's possible, but I don't think it's likely. Yes, he has the name recognition, no doubt, but how many Californians can say, with pride, "Governor Schwarzenegger"? (How many of them can even say "Schwarzenegger"?)

I don't like the whole recall bullshit. But California law allows the Republicans to get away with it. I don't like it, but I have to live with it, and since I have to live with it, I'm going to do what I can to bring about the best possible outcome.

So I'm voting "no" on the recall and hoping that the majority of California voters vote "no" along with me. I don't like Davis and I voted for the Green Party gubernatorial candidate in November, but the highest number of voters picked Davis, and I know that I must honor their choice. It's called "democracy," this quirky concept that only we traitors, as Ann Coulter calls us, believe in anymore.

But unless a better progressive recall candidate emerges between now and 5 p.m. Saturday (the deadline for recall candidates to file their candidacy papers), I'm voting for Arianna Huffington as Davis' replacement just in case Davis is recalled. (Those who vote "no" on the recall will be allowed to pick a replacement candidate just in case, so that they have a say in who the next governor will be if Davis is ousted.)

The funny thing is that if Arianna wins, she will be a bigger nightmare to the Republicans than Gray Davis could ever be. Davis, the "coin-operated governor," as he is sometimes called, is notorious for cozying up to corporate donors, while Arianna, in her columns and books, repeatedly blasts corporations and the unfair amount of power and influence that their money buys them (her latest book is Pigs at the Trough: How Corporate Greed and Political Corruption are Undermining America).

The ultimate irony would be that the Republicans' lust for power and greed -- which has brought us this bullshit recall election -- put Arianna Huffington in the governor's office.

Links:

Arianna for Governor

FAQs about Arianna Huffington and the California recall


9:23:18 PM    Comments []

Progressive columnist Arianna Huffington is going to throw her hat into the dirty California recall race.

Et tu, Arianna?

I got this e-mail from Arianna Huffington yesterday:

My friends,

As you may have noticed, I've taken two weeks off from writing my column. I have spent this time meeting with community leaders and the activists who started runariannarun.com and doing a lot of thinking -- and tossing and turning -- about whether I should run for Governor of California in the upcoming recall election.

During this time, I've received many wonderful e-mails from so many of you urging me to run.  Well, tomorrow morning at 10:30 a.m. at A Place Called Home in South Central Los Angeles (a center for at-risk children I’m on the board of; directions below), I'll be announcing my decision.

You've been reading every week my outrage at the state of our politics, and I would love it if you could be there to join me as I make the leap from analysis to action -- from columnist to candidate.

For those of you who are not in Los Angeles, I ask you to be with me in spirit and I hope I can rely on your support and counsel in the weeks to come.

Hope to see you there,

Arianna

[Directions to A Place Called Home follow.]

Sorry, Arianna, but I can't make it. (Really, I can't. I live in Sacramento and I have to be at work today.) Did you get my e-mail? I sent it to you on July 26. It read:

Dear Ms. Huffington:

I am a fan of yours and therefore I ask you NOT to run in the California recall election.

Although I voted for Green Party gubernatorial candidate Peter Camejo in November 2002, I am voting against the recall because it is a blow to democracy. The people of California spoke in November 2002. They elected Gray Davis.

This recall sets a dangerous precedent: Keep calling for elections until your party wins.

The recall is the effort of one wealthy Californian politician
[Republican U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa] to buy himself power -- the same abuse that is the bread and butter of your column. [Issa
spent $1.7 million of his own money to finance the recall, in which he is a candidate, of course; he has been trying to buy himself public office for some time now.]

For you to run in the recall election would be your tacit endorsement of this dirty power grab.

Therefore, if you run, I don't see how I can remain your fan.

Thank you for listening.

Robert Crook
Sacramento

Huffington's intent, I think, is clear. She writes, "I would love it if you could be there to join me as I make the leap from analysis to action -- from columnist to candidate," telling us in advance what her decision is, and surely she wouldn't give people directions only to show up to hear her say that she isn't going to run.

Arianna is in great company: Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt has announced that he'll be a candidate in the recall race, and testosterone-movie actor Arnold Schwarzenegger is expected to announce today whether or not he will be a candidate and then discuss his decision on tonight's "The Tonight Show." (Hey, Arnold, you're not denigrating the office of the governor or anything by turning it into infotainment. Fuck, why don't we just have a reality television show to determine who the next governor will be? We can call it "Who Wants to Be Governor of California?" You and Arianna and Larry and Darrell can compete; whoever can swallow the most live maggots gets to be guv -- or something like that.)

I will post my further thoughts on the bullshit recall election soon. I've been meaning to do so for weeks, but the face of the recall seems to change every day. Lawsuits are flying all over the place. Gov. Davis' lawyers have filed a lawsuit in the California Supreme Court to try to push the recall election from October to March, when California will have its presidential primary election. That would give Davis more time to campaign to save his ass, and California Democrats would be out en masse to vote for "President" Bush's Democratic challenger in 2004, perhaps giving Davis a better chance to survive the recall than if it were held in October.

Two other lawsuits filed in the California Supreme Court would make the Democratic lieutenant governor, Cruz Bustamante, Davis' automatic replacement if voters vote to recall Davis. The basis for these lawsuits is a provision in the state constitution that makes the lietenant governor the new governor in case the governor is removed from office for any reason.

Also, the deadline for recall candidates to file candidacy papers is 5 p.m. Saturday. (Anyone with $3,500 for the filing fee and only 65 signatures -- or more signatures and a lower filing fee -- can file to be a candidate in the recall.) At least the field of candidates will be known, so that part of the recall process will be solidified.


6:57:32 AM    Comments []



© Copyright 2006 Robert Crook. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 4/25/2006; 12:01:49 AM.
Powered by