Robert's Virtual Soapbox
Hey, fellow moonbat, have you had your wingnut blood today?
Last updated:
4/24/2006; 11:44:08 PM


July 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Jun   Aug



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Robert's Virtual Soapbox" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Robert Crook:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Wednesday, July 14, 2004

Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) speaks during a press conference to discuss support for passage of the Marriage Amendment in the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., July 13, 2004. Washington Redskins football player Darrell Green is seen behind Santorum. President Bush's bid to amend the Constitution to ban same sex-marriage headed toward defeat on Tuesday, with Democratic foe John Kerry accusing him of divisive election-year politics. Proponents scrambled to win the support of half of the 100-member Senate, but both sides said the measure seemed certain to be blocked on a procedural vote on Wednesday. Photo by Mannie Garcia/Reuters

Republican Pennsylvania Sen. Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum, who always struck me as a self-loathing closet case, incredibly stupidly asserted today that preventing same-sex marriage is essential to "homeland security." The supposedly straight Santorum has a strange obsession with homosexuality. (Reuters photo) 

Fags and dykes: The new Jews

Every fascist regime needs an enemy.

The Bush regime has made Muslims The Foreign Enemy and gay men and lesbians The Domestic Enemy.

The Enemy, you see, is Everywhere.

Republican Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania -- who in an April 2003 Associated Press interview said that he's OK with people being homosexual, as long as they never actually have sex with members of the same sex, and equated homosexuality with polygamy and incest-- actually said this today shortly before the U.S. Senate voted, 50-48*, against advancing a misguided measure to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex marriage:

"I would argue that the future of our country hangs in the balance because the future of marriage hangs in the balance. Isn't that the ultimate homeland security, standing up and defending marriage?"

For its desire to oppress people based upon its backasswards, patriarchal religious beliefs, I think we can start calling the Bush regime the American Taliban.

*The Associated Press reports that "45 Republicans and three Democrats voted to advance the measure, while 43 Democrats, six Republicans and one independent voted to scuttle it." Sixty votes would have been required for the measure to go forward. Reuters notes that "For a proposed constitutional amendment to become law, it must be approved by two-thirds of the House and Senate and then ratified by 38 of the 50 states" and that "the House is also expected to fall far short of the needed votes when it takes up the measure, likely in September."


9:31:09 PM    Comments []




© Copyright 2006 Robert Crook. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 4/24/2006; 11:44:08 PM.
Powered by