Robert's Virtual Soapbox
It's not mean if it's true.
Last updated:
9/2/2005; 1:48:18 AM


August 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Jul   Sep



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Robert's Virtual Soapbox" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Robert Crook:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Sunday, August 14, 2005

San Francisco Chronicle photo

San Franciscan Roberto Hernandez just won $270,000 in a lawsuit against Univision, which outed him on live national radio in 2002. Univision did, um, screw Hernandez up the butt by invading his privacy, but Hernandez won for his claim of emotional distress, which only reinforces the widespread cultural belief that we homosexuals are inherently defective and thus are to be ashamed of ourselves. (And besides, if you're a man living in San Francisco, isn't it just assumed that you're gay? And in the picture of him above, Hernandez doesn't look like the most masculine man on the planet to me. Before Univision announced it, was there really anyone who didn't already know that he is gay?)

Roberto Hernandez is GAY

(and I don't think that he can sue me [and win])

California is the most litigious state in the nation. Part of the reason for this, of course, is that California is the most populous state of the nation. And then there are things like this (from the San Francisco Chronicle):

A San Francisco man who was outed as gay on a national Spanish-language radio show and says his life was devastated as a result will receive $270,000 from Univision Radio, an arbitrator in the case has ruled.

Univision Radio, the largest Spanish-language radio broadcaster in the United States, also agreed Friday to sensitivity training for employees in its five biggest markets, said Monica Taher, a media director for the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation. That action was not part of the arbitration, but it shows the impact of 45-year-old Roberto Hernandez's stand against insensitivity to gays and lesbians, which is rampant in Spanish-language media, Taher said.

"This is the first time where we see a case in which the victim decides to take the law into his hands and sues a mega-giant company such as Univision, " Taher said. "It sets a precedent for other LGBT people that they can do something about cases like this."

A Univision Radio representative could not be reached to confirm the sensitivity training.

Hernandez was driving to work in October 2002 when he received a phone call from a man who said that his name was Juan and that he met Hernandez at a San Francisco gay bar. The caller gave Hernandez his phone number and then announced that the conversation was being broadcast live on the "Raul Brindis and Pepito Show," based in Houston.

Hernandez worked for the local station that broadcasted the show, KSOL, and sold advertising for the program. He said he was disappointed with the outcome and was so depressed that he could no longer work.

"It's a nightmare," Hernandez said. "How do you live with such an embarrassment in your life? How do you live when someone makes your life so insignificant? Any kind of help or support would be welcome to my life, because I need it at this moment."

Hernandez had been discreet about disclosing his sexual orientation before the incident, not even telling his family.

Arbitrator Rebecca Westerfield found that Hernandez had suffered emotional distress but dismissed claims of workplace sexual harassment and that Hernandez had no choice but to quit his job and thus was owed workers' compensation. She did not rule on whether his right to privacy was violated.

Hernandez was awarded $250,000 and nearly $20,000 in economic damages because of the emotional distress that led to seven months of unemployment after quitting his job. He was awarded no punitive damages.

Hernandez said he was most disappointed that Brindis was not punished for his homophobic prank.

The arbitration settlement states Brindis was "warned and never repeated the conduct," though Hernandez's attorneys say the host was only disciplined over broadcasting conversations without consent.

Hernandez's colleague who gave Brindis the cell phone number was fired.

Attorneys for Univision and Hispanic Broadcasting Corp., which owned the station at the time, would not comment.

Wow. Now, Hernandez does not deny his homosexuality, so he could not have sued Univision for defamation and won (by definition, defamation is making a false claim about someone).

Undoubtedly, the radio station showed incredibly poor judgment in outing Hernandez. Was outing him on the air supposed to be funny? Perhaps on a program called the "Raul Brindis and Pepito Show," outing a private, non-famous individual on live national radio indeed is considered to constitute humor. (Perhaps it's a cultural thing, like how those Mexican postage stamps with a black cartoon character who looks more like a monkey than a human being are widely considered normal and inoffensive in Mexico.)

All of us, when we receive a telephone call, have the right to the reasonable expectation that the phone conversation is not, unbeknownst to us, being broadcast on live fucking radio. So I would think that Hernandez had a valid invasion of privacy claim against Univision, and I'm surprised that the arbitrator didn't go there.

I have no reason to doubt that Hernandez, who apparently was a closet case until his outing (many Latinos, even many of those who are big ol' blips on the gaydar, are closet cases because of the whole machismo thing), experienced at least some amount of emotional distress as the result of his outing.

My Black's Law Dictionary defines "intentional infliction of emotional distress" as "the tort of intentionally or recklessly causing another person severe emotional distress through one's extreme or outrageous acts." Intent is very difficult to prove, so I guess it's good that "or recklessly" is part of that definition, because while the idiots at the radio station might not have intentionally caused Hernandez emotional distress, certainly their acts were reckless, outrageous and stupid. They acted at least neglectfully if not maliciously.

But what bothers me about this news story is that, apparently, being homosexual is so shameful -- to use Hernandez's words, "such an embarrassment" -- that a gay man just won $270,000 for emotional distress because he was outed. The $270,000 awarded to Roberto Hernandez reinforces the widespread cultural belief that to be gay is to be defective and thus is something to feel ashamed of.

I hope that Hernandez buys himself some awfully nice things with his $270,000.

Maybe he'll donate some of it to the gay and lesbian community that he has just harmed. (Yeah, right.)


1:15:04 PM    Comments []

Feasting on table scraps: Once again, Ted Rall nails it.

The Democratic Party might start winning again when its "leaders" will no longer tolerate the table scraps that the Repugnicans toss at them every once in a while -- and when the people will no longer tolerate the table scraps that the DINO (Democratic-in-name-only) "leaders" toss at them every once in a while.

One such table scrap is the recent loss of Gulf War II veteran Paul Hackett, the Democratic candidate, in a congressional race in Ohio.

Here is an e-mail I received from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee last week, the subject line of which is "No Republican Is Safe":

 

 

Dear Friend,

On August 2nd, we sent a shockwave through the Republican Party. In case you don't know me, I was the Democratic candidate in the special election for Ohio's second congressional district. I am also a veteran of the Iraq War.

In a district that has seen 40 point Democratic losses for 15 years, we came within four points. That was after Tom DeLay and the national Republicans poured in a half a million dollars to shore up my opponent.

I couldn't be prouder of our campaign. The national Republicans promised to "bury" me, but we stood tough and put them in their place. On Thursday the Washington Post asked their spokesman whether they had fulfilled their promise, and the spokesman admitted simply: "we did not." Newt Gingrich himself called it "a wake-up call to Republicans."

There are so many people who made this possible. Never having run for public office before, I was amazed by people's hard work, long hours and dedication to my campaign. I could not have run this race without the grassroots Democrats coming to my aid -- in message, in boots on the ground, and in contributions to my campaign.

And there was another team who was working on my behalf. At the most critical point of the campaign, the DCCC sent staff to direct a get-out-the-vote operation unlike anything this district has seen in decades. They helped me turn my campaign into a well-oiled machine.

Contribute to the DCCC for a Democratic Congress.

While I took on my opponent head to head, unbeknownst to me the DCCC was quietly tracking the race, digging up the facts, and feeling out vulnerabilities. They lulled the Republicans into complacency for weeks -- then unloaded a massive, devastating ad buy exposing my opponent's ties to the scandal-plagued Ohio Republican Party.

My experience as a candidate taught me more than I can say, but I can tell you two things right now:

1. This race shows that no Republican is safe, and

2. The DCCC will be the key player in seeing that Democrats take full advantage of Republican vulnerabilities.

Contribute to the DCCC for a Democratic Congress.

After the chips have fallen in November of 2006, I hope we can look back at my race as the first page in a new chapter in history. A chapter where accountability and integrity were brought back to our government. A chapter where deceit and influence-peddling were not taken for granted from those in power.

A chapter where the Democratic agenda of hope and prosperity can make the government work for the American people instead of against them.

I am proud that my race for Ohio's 2nd can serve as a template for how we win seats across this country in 2006.

Our success, and the help of the grassroots community in my race, gives confidence that we will win in 2006. Please help support Democratic candidates across the country.

Contribute to the DCCC for a Democratic Congress.

Thanks for listening, and thanks for your support in this thrilling experience. Please help the DCCC -- I know they'll make us proud.

Sincerely,

Paul Hackett, proud Democrat
 

 

Don't get me wrong -- that Hackett did so well in such a traditionally Repugnican congressional district is a great thing. And I hope that his narrow loss indeed is a harbinger of the Democrats taking back the House in November 2006.

But isn't it just a little fucked up that the Democratic Party sent out an e-mail that essentially says, "Hey, we almost won an election! Now give us your money!"?

Doesn't it indicate how out of touch the Democratic Party "leaders" are with the people? Worse, doesn't it indicate how much bullshit we, the people, are willing to tolerate from our DINO "leaders"?

I gave hundreds of dollars and hundreds of hours of my free time to the Kerry-Edwards campaign only to discover, after the election, that the campaign didn't spend millions of the dollars that it raised in such a close presidential race, in a race that was so close that those unspent millions might have made the difference -- and only to watch John Kerry concede Ohio so quickly.

The Democratic Party establishment keeps lowering the bar. The bar has been lowered to the point where we, the people, actually are expected to feel inspired by close losses.

Howard Dean, you have your work cut out for you.


12:02:54 PM    Comments []



© Copyright 2005 Robert Crook. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 9/2/2005; 1:48:19 AM.
Powered by