Updated: 11/29/2004; 2:34:24 PM.

Rayne Today
Searching for dharma, in spite of the weather...


daily link  Tuesday, February 11, 2003


Just for grins…

 

Some time ago, say last September or October, The Raven published an extremely helpful link to a diagram with instructions on defense against telemarketers.  (Testimony: My hubby, not exactly a blog-happy guy, took that one piece to heart and has since mastered the fine art of harassing telemarketers.) 

 

A friend sent the following, umm, instructions for dealing with telemarketers; this will augment my hubby’s tool box quite nicely.  Hope that stockbroker tries to cold-call him at the office again very soon…if you’ve seen this before, sorry; if not, enjoy!

 

Things To Say To Telemarketers

 

1. If they want to loan you money, tell them you just filed for bankruptcy and you could sure use some money.

 

2. If they start out with, "How are you today?" say, "I'm so glad you asked, because no one these days seems to care, and I have all these problems. My arthritis is acting up, my eyelashes

are sore, my dog just died . . . "

 

3. If they say they're John Doe from XYZ Company, ask them to spell their name. Then ask them to spell the company name. Then ask them where it is located, how long it has been in business, how many people work there, how they got into this line of work, if they are married, how many kids they have, etc. Continue asking them personal questions or questions about their company for as long as necessary.

 

4. This works great if you are male. Telemarketer: "Hi, my name is Judy and I'm with XYZ Company. " You: Wait for a second and with a real husky voice ask, "What are you wearing?"

 

5. Cry out in surprise, "Judy? Is that you? Oh my God! Judy, how have you been?" Hopefully, this will give Judy a few brief moments of terror as she tries to figure out where she could know you from.

 

6. Say "No" over and over. Be sure to vary the sound of each one, and keep a rhythmic tempo, even as they are trying to speak. This is most fun if you can do it until they hang up.

 

7. If MCI calls trying to get you to sign up for the Family and Friends Plan, reply, in as sinister a voice as you can, "I don't have any friends, would you be my friend?"

 

8. If the company cleans rugs, respond: "Can you get out blood? Can you get out goat blood? How about human blood?"

 

9. After the Telemarketer gives his or her spiel, ask him or her to marry you. When they get all flustered, tell them that you can't just give your credit card number to a complete stranger.

 

10. Tell the Telemarketer that you work for the same company, and they can't sell to employees.

 

11. Answer the phone. As soon as you realize it is a Telemarketer, set the receiver down, scream, "Oh my God!" and then hang up.

 

12. Tell the Telemarketer you are busy at the moment and ask him/her if he/she will give you his/her home phone number so you can call him/her back. When the Telemarketer explains that telemarketers cannot give out their home numbers say, "I guess you don't want anyone bothering you at home, right?" The Telemarketer will agree and you say, "Me either!" Hang up.

 

13. Ask them to repeat everything they say, several times.

 

14. Tell them it is dinner time, but ask if they would please hold. Put them on your speaker phone while you continue to eat at your leisure. Smack your food loudly and continue with your dinner conversation.

 

15. Tell the Telemarketer you are on "home incarceration" and ask if they could bring you some beer.

 

16. Ask them to fax the information to you, and make up a number.

 

17. Tell the Telemarketer, "Okay, I'll listen to you. But I should probably tell you, I'm not wearing any clothes."

 

18. Insist that the caller is really your buddy Leon, playing a joke. "Come on, Leon, cut it out! Seriously, Leon, how's your momma?"

 

19. Tell them you are hard of hearing and that they need to speak up . . . louder . . . louder . . .

 

20. Tell them to talk very slowly, because you want to write every word down.

 

  7:14:06 PM  permalink  comment []

RantsCounterRants:  Anti-terrorism draft – good thing or bad thing?

 

Read it for yourself, check it out.  What do you think?

 

InfoWorld cites the Center for Public Integrity on the anti-terrorism draft now under review.

 

I’m very concerned about the loosey-goosey quality of the wording that’s implied in the articles at InfoWorld and CPI.  Somebody deems a situation an “emergency”, begins monitoring of one’s communications without a warrant of any kind.

 

Does it even have to be a “clear and present danger” to be an “emergency”, I wonder?

 

So now some unspecified law enforcement or governmental figure can arbitrarily deem a situation to be an emergency – is an emergency terrorism or is terrorism an emergency?  Who’s going to define terrorism, the same person who defines an emergency?

 

What if speaking negatively to a broad audience is seen as terrorist activity, by virtue of its potential to undermine authority?  Does that mean posting in an e-mail or a blog against the current administration is a terrorist threat and an emergency?

 

Adding insult to injury: this draft may have made the rounds to VP Cheney and Speaker of the House Hastert without so much as a by-your-leave to the public.  What a load of crap, trying to slide this one under the table.

 

As soon as I can download a copy of the draft, I’m going to review it with a fine toothed comb, to see exactly what it is our fearless leaders are trying to pull over on us.  The CPI site may be busy with downloading, I can’t seem to connect properly.

 

This whole thing leaves me with a really creepy feeling and a bunch of unanswered questions.

 

UPDATE -- 5:00 pm EST --

 

Now I'm really concerned.  I could only open one page of the .PDF file at CPI's site; what I saw was a poor copy, parts of the text truncated.  I couldn't open the HTML version at the alternate site, dailyrotten.com; kept getting a 404 error.  What little I did see at CPI worried me a LOT.

 

Finally cracked the HTML version at dailyrotten.com; good thing, it's more complete.  And very scary, note this piece alone:

 

"Section 105: Law Enforcement Use of FISA Information.

50 U.S.C. § 1806(b) currently prohibits the disclosure of information "for law enforcement purposes" unless the disclosure includes a statement that the information cannot be used in a criminal proceeding without the Attorney General's advance authorization. This provision would amend § 1806(b) to give federal investigators and prosecutors greater flexibility to use FISA-obtained information. Specifically, it would eliminate the requirement that the Attorney General personally approve the use of such information in the criminal context, and would substitute a requirement that such use be approved by the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General.""

Doesn't the phrase "greater flexibility" strike you as a little broad?  The requirement this suggested change eliminates has nothing whatsoever to do with flexibility of usage, only flexibility of chain of authorization.  Fast and loose, that's how it looks...and I'm only on Page 2!

UPDATE -- 5:15 pm EST --

It's worse, only made it through the next paragraph.  Read it yourself and contact your Senator now, find out when we are going to see a formal public discussion as Sen. Patrick Leahy has suggested.  This is bad stuff and I'm only looking at a draft of suggested changes, not the actual text of a new draft. 

"Section 106: Defense of Reliance on Authorization.

50 U.S.C. § 1809(b) and 1827(b) create a defense for agents who engage in unauthorized surveillance or searches, or who disclose information without authorization, if they were relying on an order issued by the FISA Court. However, there does not appear to be a statutory defense for agents who engage in surveillance or searches pursuant to FISA authorities under which no prior court approval is required--e.g., pursuant to FISA's wartime exception (50 U. S.C. §§ 1811, 1829 & 1844), or FISA's presidential authorization exception (50 U.S.C. § 1802 & 1822(a)). This provision would clarify that the "good faith reliance" defense is available, not just when agents are acting pursuant to a FISA Court order, but also when they are acting pursuant to a lawful authorization from the President or the Attorney General. "

 So, in other words, nearly any officer of the law could have impunity to act in any way they deem necessary, either through authorized and unauthorized surveillance and searches, if someone (no idea who this is yet) deems this necessary to fight terrorism.  The defense would be "good faith"...in other words, "Hey, I'm just doing my job, man!  Get off my back!"

 

I hope you're scared sh*tless.  I am.

  3:54:03 PM  permalink  comment []

What’s for Dinner?: Hubby’s away, time to play…

 

No, you silly lecher!  It’s not what you think!

 

(Although edible chocolate body paint does sound amusing if messy; maybe I should post a recipe for making your own at home…)

 

  3:23:50 PM  permalink  comment []

DharmaSurfing:  The Interview, looming on the horizon...

 

For those of you who’ve been job hunters: did you ever experience a sensation where all of your life kind of tunneled down to that fateful few moments, spiraled downward in tightening circles into the interview?

 

I feel like that.  Like I’m getting sucked into a vortex.

 

Cheese-on-rice, I tell myself, tomorrow’s just another damned interview.  Like the hundreds of interviews I’ve either had or given in my lifetime.  No big deal, piece of cake, I’m not heavily invested in the outcome, I won’t curl up and die if I don’t get this job.

 

My kids don’t even want me to get this job because of the shift work hassles this will entail.

 

Maybe that’s the real problem; I’m conflicted about this being in the best interest of my family.  I keep thinking of all those poor single parents – hell, anybody with tech skills out of work -- who have no choice but to lunge at jobs like this one, people who have fewer resources than I have.  Will I take this purely out of guilt if offered, should I feel remorse or glee?  If it’s not offered, should I feel any regret?

 

Will I suddenly lapse back into the mold I left 7 months ago, a corporate “ho”, giving it up for da’ man?  Or will being a mere contractor keep me from sliding down that slippery slope? 

 

Will the pay be so laughable as to make this agonizing more pathetic than it is?  Or will the meager benefits make this all worthwhile?

 

Argh…I gotta’ find something constructive to do today, or I’m going to go batty from this useless navel-gazing.

  10:59:32 AM  permalink  comment []

RantsCounterRants:  Not Today?  Maybe tomorrow?

 

E-mail sent to NBC:

 

 

Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003

From: "Rayne Today" <rayne_today@yahoo.com>;

Subject: Today Show 11-FEB-03 -- Couric Interview w/ Clinton

To: today@nbc.com

 

Dear Sirs/Mesdames;

 

I especially enjoyed Katie Couric's interview of Former President Bill Clinton this morning on Today.  I hoped to re-read excerpts from this interview at your Today Show webpage.

 

However this interview is not featured or mentioned in any way as of 10:15 am EST today.  Will this be featured soon?

 

Thanks very much for your attention,

 

~Rayne Today

 

 

It does seem rather odd they’ve got the interviews with both President Ford and Ted Turner on the web page, but nothing at all on Clinton – not indicating he was on the schedule this morning (this morning’s programming has already been whisked off the site) nor that he’d been on at all.  And I’m sure the interview was canned, should already be available for posting.

 

Was it something he said?

 

(Especially the parts about the UN and consensus?)

 

 

UPDATE -- 12-FEB-03 9:15 pm EST --

 

Looks like NBC finally updated their website with the interview:  http://www.msnbc.com/news/871318.asp?0dm=V11LV

 

No e-mail response, though.  Whatever.

 

  10:29:30 AM  permalink  comment []

 
The WeatherPixie
February 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28  
Jan   Mar
Salon Daily Reads
Newer Kids on the Blog
Outside this garden
Awaiting Return
Tech Sector/Resources
Political Resources
Subscribe to "Rayne Today" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website.

Click here to surf other Blogs By 
Women

Click 
here to join the May Day Project

The Mandarin Scavenger Hunt

DFA Meetup

Listed on BlogShares
Copyright 2004 © Rayne Today.
Last update: 11/29/2004; 2:34:24 PM.