Judas the traitor
The name "Judas" is associated with the lowest of traitors, one who for a rather modest sum of money choses to give over a beloved leader to death, and throws away all his ideals in the process.
It is an interesting fact that in the gospels of Mark, Matthew and John, Judas Iscariot chose to betray Jesus immediately after he had been anointed with oil by Mary Magdalene. Could there be a connection here?
The anointing was no impulsive act from one person. The idea that Judas was offended because of the high cost of the oil, and was motivated by personal greed, is quite implausible. It's obvious that Magdalene could never have bought such an expensive oil herself. Most likely, many or at least some rich (and powerful!) benefactorers of Jesus had contributed to it. It had been a group effort. Why? It meant that Jesus' followers officially recognized Jesus as king. This was a political act of rebellion.
So, Judas may well have been a follower of Jesus because of the moral/religious message. He now realized where they were heading: open confrontation with the Roman authorities and with the powerful priests, both at the same time. Obviously, if it came to conflict, the lives of everyone who were known to be associated with Jesus would have been in danger. It is quite possible an act of self-preservation from Judas' part to betray Jesus. Maybe not only pure cowardize; he may have been repulsed by such a political act.
Some other facts that doesn't sit well in the gospels, closely related to this issue: Why did Jesus need to be betrayed? Jesus is shown moving openly about in the gospel accounts. That means they would not need a traitor to find him. Judas' betrayal only makes sense if Jesus' whereabouts were secret. Obviously, even how Jesus looked like was secret if we should take the accounts of Jesus' arrest seriously, as Judas had to identify him to the armed men by a kiss (detail from artwork from St. John's in Rome).
It is obvious, therefor, that if these accounts are correct, then the stories about Jesus' riding on a mule into Jerusalem and other accounts about publicly performed acts are fiction (or at least exaggerrations).
What picture do we have? One of a secret group of revolutionaries, anointing their leader to king over Israel, only to have him betrayed to the Romans and executed shortly afterwards. Many details of the real story are still in the gospels, despite the attempts by his followers to make this disaster look like a triumph and a planned sacrifice.
I'm not saying these are the actual facts about the case, but the story (stories) about the betrayal raises a few interesting questions.
Tim at For Whom the Blog Tolls just posted a great fragment, as I chose to call it, inspiring some thinking about betrayal, Judas and Jesus. You should read it. It was what made me pick up these thoughts now.
9:58:53 PM
|