Secular Blasphemy
all the news I see fit to print

 



Subscribe to "Secular Blasphemy" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  15. mars 2004


Keep an eye on those upcoming elections

After the stunning victory to al-Qaeda in the recent Spanish elections, you may perhaps wonder where the next elections are. Check out ElectionGuide.org.

There are upcoming elections next month in South Korea, India and South Africa, but these countries are not hanging in the balance in the war on terror. Neither is traditionally non-aligned Austria, which elects a president in April.

The Phillippines on May 10 may well see the new democractic doctrine of Islamic terrorists tested. But the country is battle-hardened and unlikely to be pushed by another deadly attack.

France elects a new parliament in September. Pretty much a waste of dynamite.

As some of you have vaguely heard of, the United States have elections in November. Will a successful 9/11-scale attack lead to Bush being blamed for inability to defend the country, or will it make Americans rally around the commander-in-chief? I don't have the answer to that.

Australia has its elections around the same time. I don't think it is a soft target.

Romania also has elections at that time. The former east bloc countries know what it is to live under a dictature, and the Romanians especially remember a crazy ruler with a fetish for palaces. If they were attacked, I think that would harden their resolve.

Norway has its parliamentary elections in September 2005 (which oddly is not mentioned by this site, indicating there are a few omissions) . At the same time comes Poland (October), who now sees itself as a potential terror target for the same reason as Spain was, and so has Denmark (November). All these three countries currently have troops in Iraq. I think Poland is made of sterner stuff for the same reason as Romania is. Not too sure about Denmark. And not at all optimistic about my own countrymen here in Norway.

Those who blog, will see.


11:52:42 PM    comment []  trackback []

Study: Acupuncture helps against headaches (or does it?)

A widely reported study concludes that acupuncture is an effective treatment of chronic headaches.

But was the test double blind?

Researchers analysed 401 patients from across the UK who reported several days of severe headaches each week.

Ahem, was the test double blind?

They were randomly allocated to receive up to 12 acupuncture treatments over three months or to a control group offering other types of care, typically medication. 

Oh, the study was not at all double blind, right?

Patients receiving acupuncture experienced 22 fewer days of headache per year, used 15% less medication, made 25% fewer visits to their GP and were absent from work through sickness 15% less than the control group.

That is very good. However, it may not tell us anything about acupuncture. Would the same happen if you prayed to Odin for them, performed some shaman ritual for them, gave them sugar pills? Not impossible. If you perform a double blind study, you find out if it's the treatment or the placebo effect that accounts for the reported effect.


10:46:05 PM    comment []  trackback []

City falls for wet hoax

Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide Now, I wrote back in December 2002. The campaign site has been up and running for quite some time, pointing out all the dangers of this murderous chemical.

Officials in the small city of Aliso Viejo in California

were so concerned about the potentially dangerous properties of dihydrogen monoxide that they considered banning foam cups after they learned the chemical was used in their production.

Oops!


6:45:44 PM    comment []  trackback []

Voices of treason

The Guardian continues its unbiased coverage of the Iraq war debate, and holds up a microphone to a representative collection of "Voices on Iraq" — a representative collection of Baathist apologists mind you:

George Galloway, anti-war campaigner and MP
'The Americans are trapped: not able to withdraw and not able to go forward. We see that they control the heavens above Iraq but cannot control a single street in Falluja.'

Geoff Hann, managing director of Hinterland Travel
'I'm still really angry at what happened in Iraq. You'll have to look very hard to justify the war and now, of course, we're in danger of it disintegrating into civil war.'

Bill Farren-Price, oil expert
'Oil will remain central to the Iraqi economy in the years ahead.'

Dr Salih Ibrahim, consultant pathologist
'And they want to give us this US democracy. What? So we can be like when Bush stole the election?'

Now, wasn't that a great selection of Voices on Iraq? Now only Noam Chomsky is missing, but he will not be for long.

More on Galloway, Britain's traitor MP.


3:04:31 PM    comment []  trackback []

Spain new PM slams Bush and Blair for "bombs" and "lies"

ZapateroSpain's prime minister elect Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero (picture) wants to make sure that al-Qaeda is getting the message that Spain is capitulating unconditionally to the terrorists. Not only will Spanish forces withdraw from Iraq as soon as possible, Zapatero delivers some hard slams against Blair and Bush in case anyone has missed the message:

He also indicated a swing away from Madrid's recent pro-American stance towards a "pro-European" foreign policy.

"The war has been a disaster, the occupation continues to be a disaster. It has only caused violence," Zapatero said in his first interview after a surprise triumph on Sunday.

"There must be consequences. There has been one already -- the election result. The second will be that the Spanish troops will come back," he said.

"Mr Blair and Mr Bush must do some reflection and self-criticism. You can't bomb a people, you can't organise a war with lies," he added in a lengthy chat with Spain's Cadena SER radio.

Well, what would be the point of capitulating to terror if you don't proudly hold your white flag high?

Zapatero — soon the proud prime minister of Al-Andalus.


1:59:51 PM    comment []  trackback []

Not a wakeup call for European cowards

Protest against Spain's AznarThose who expected the horrible scenes of carnage in Madrid to be a wakeup call for Europeans, now appears sadly mistaken.

In the United States, after 9/11-01, only the lunatic fringe argued that the country "brought this on itself" through perceived or real unethical practices of the past.

In continental Europe, blaming the victim is the mainstream position. The European press today holds Aznar responsible for the attacks, not Bin Laden.

If ETA had been responsible for the attacks, they would have been met with the total rage, especially from the Spanish population. Al-Qaeda is more considered a natural hazard than an expression of absolute nihilistic evil. To Europeans, the war on terror has been America's war, and stupidly, America and everybody allied to America is blamed for the terrorist attacks.

Ignored is the fact that al-Qaeda was established in Europe, and particularly in Spain, even before 9/11-01. Spain has been one of the primary entrance points to Europe for North African immigrants, most of them Muslims, and some of them obviously extremists. Spain was used by terrorists planning the deadly attacks on the US, and the country has been an unwilling host to a number of al-Qaeda cells ever since. One of them, it now appears likely, carried out the March 11 attacks on Madrid trains. That Spain was a target that the Islamofascists could hit is really sufficient reason for the country being hit. That Spain participated in Iraq, and was (rightly) perceived as weak on terror, is another.

The Islamist online policy document earlier discussed here has become a chilling prediction. Spain was predicted as the weakest link in the war on terror and George Bush's coalition of the willing. A majority of Spain's voters gave them right.

Evidence of Islamist involvement has grown steadily. Yesterday's El Pais reported that an Arabic document found on the internet suggested that al-Qa'eda was planning an attack before the elections.

Spain was identified as "a weak link" in the US-led coalition in Iraq as the document noted that a majority of Spaniards was against the war.

"For the maximum effect" it suggested an attack just before the elections. "Spain could not tolerate more than two or three attacks without having to withdraw its troops from Iraq."

A video statement claiming to be from al-Qa'eda which was broadcast on the eve of the election appeared designed as an appeal to Spanish voters.

It described the Madrid massacre as "a response for your collaboration with the criminals Bush and his allies".

A large majority of the Spanish opposed the war in Iraq from the start, and this carefully timed message from al-Qaeda found resonance with enough voters to oust the Popular Party from power.

The socialist winner of the election, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, has today announced that he intends to withdraw Spain's 1,300 troops from Iraq.

European media has politely not even asked if this will be perceived as giving in to terrorism, and making sure that al-Qaeda accomplished exactly what they wanted. Nobody mentions the elephant in the room. Well, except the Telegraph.

Juan Fernando Lopez Aguilar, one of the leading Socialist Party figures, told the Telegraph yesterday that it would put withdrawal from Iraq at the top of its agenda.

"One of the first decisions will be to bring the troops back home," he said. "We have said that we would pull them out by June 30.

"We have always believed it has not been a legitimate occupation of a foreign land and has no constitutional basis."

Mr Lopez Aguilar denied that this could be seen as a victory for the terrorists. "It is not intended to send any message to al-Qa'eda. It is a political commitment," he said.

Ironically, elsewhere it is reported that on the top of his agenda looms the fight against terrorism:

"My immediate priority will be to fight terrorism, and the first thing I will do tomorrow -- Monday -- will be to search for the unity of the political forces to concentrate all of our efforts in that fight."

Indeed, the top priority of Spain's new government is rushing to give in to terrorist demands.

Intended or not, this sends a message loud and clear to al-Qaeda and the entire Muslim world: Europe is weak on terror. If we are threatened, and especially if we are attacked, we will cower and we will give in to terrorist demands. The people will be raging, not against the perpetrators of the cold murder of hundreds of innocents, but against the leaders who uncompromisingly stood up to fight the terrorists, inviting their attention.

In El Pozo, where one of the trains exploded, the Socialist Party was expecting its usual landslide victory. Many in the neighbourhood had lost friends or family in the explosion. "The government is to blame for the attacks," said Tamara Pizarro, 20. "France and Germany stayed out of the war, so they have nothing to fear. Aznar has blood on his hands." [...]

"Aznar got his war, but we got the dead," said Victoria Ruiz, 38, a Socialist Party helper at the polling station. She said Spain's involvement in Iraq had given al-Qa'eda a reason to attack it. "Now I am frightened. Al-Qa'eda is not like Eta, it's like a ghost. You don't know who you're fighting."

No doubt the attack and its massively successive aftermath will lead to repeated calls for withdrawal from Iraq in other European countries, including Denmark and Norway. If these leftist demands are not sufficient to accomplish the goal, al-Qaeda knows how to give them greater support in the population.

The voters of Spain have invited the terrorists to hit us again, to kill more of us, because they have shown the world that we will give in to their demands.

Update: I am not alone in these sentiments. Tim Blair has a good overview of blog responses to the Spanish disaster. My countryman Bjørn Stærk is delivering a blunt message to the Spanish voters today:

Yours is the kind of stupidity that kills. It may kill more of you, next time, or more of us. You've spoken up on behalf of Europe, for all the world's terrorists to hear, and all you've got to say is "We surrender! And please let us know, by the usual method, if there are any more of our policies you disagree with".

Precisely.


10:55:29 AM    comment []  trackback []

MrPicassoHead

This is a great site, featuring a flash applet that lets anyone "draw" a Picasso-style illustration using primitives. Very creative, and some people have accomplished some really cool pictures.

No need to look too closely to mine, as it will just confirm that I should rather stick to writing.


9:55:12 AM    comment []  trackback []

Policeman shot baker for refusing to mourn terror victims

A French baker was shot dead by an off-duty police officer in the Spanish city Pamplona, because he refused to put up a mourning symbol in memory of the victims of the Madrid terror bombing. The killing lead to Basque protest marches in the French city of Bayonne.

I've not yet found this news item in English-language media, but picked it from a Norwegian article in TV2 Nettavisen.


1:25:56 AM    comment []  trackback []

Support starving blogger!

Following an increasingly popular trend in the blogsphere, I have very optimistically added a tip jar.


12:05:39 AM    comment []  trackback []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 Jan Haugland.
Last update: 01.04.2004; 02:26:47.

March 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Feb   Apr

Library

My articles

Sport

"Can you hear me, Maggie Thatcher?"

9/11 conspiracies

Debunking Michael Meacher

Lost and Found

Don't mess with my false memories

Afterlives Inc

Does the soul exist? (Part 2)

Love to Hate

Why Anti-Americanism?

Marital Bliss?

The bridezilla from hell (pt 2)

anti-gun nut

Michael Moore's unconvincing defence

The Just Not Right Dept

'Anthropic principle' debunk

Religion

Is it right because God says so?

Humour

Hu's on first

Words, words, words

The lost philological battles

History

So you think you are having a bad time?

Nutrition

Living on sunlight, or feeding on gullability?

Jan/Male/31-35. Lives in Norway/Bergen, speaks Norwegian and English. Eye color is hazel. I am a god. I am also modest.
This is my blogchalk:
Norway, Bergen, Norwegian, English, Jan, Male, 31-35.