"60 Minutes" going down in flames over forged Bush memos

If you want to forge documents that supposedly were made in 1972, it is not a good idea to write them in Microsoft Word using the font Times New Roman. Remembering to turn off the autocorrect feature that makes "1st" into "1st" is also a clever move. CBS "60 Minutes" journalists may be dumb enough to fall for it, sure, but the people in the blogosphere sure aren't. PowerLine was first, which brought great credit and server-bombing traffic to them.
There was old style journalist blood in the water, and boy did the bloggers have a good time. Even leftist bloggers who'd love these AWOL charges against Bush to be true had to concede, sort of.
The mainstream media, for once, jumped on to it pretty fast. CBS is stupidly standing by its story, for now.
Even the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten writes about this today, linking the LGF (if they understood permalinks, I'd suggest linking here and here, explaining the facsmile above).
I have to find a way to set up my computer to wake me up when something really important happens in the blogosphere. Now that would require some clever heuristics.
Update: Fixed link. Note a very good overview of the issue at Tech Central Station with the $64K question:
The more basic question is how could a rabble of bloggers, in one day, provide hard core proof of forgery when major news organizations took those documents at face value? Most fundamental of all, why did the New York Times, the Boston Globe and CBS allow themselves to be used for such a transparent attempt to slander President Bush? Out in the blogosphere there are a swarm of people rooting for the answers.
I think we already know the answer. It's amazing what a combination of bias and incompetence can accomplish.
3:53:42 PM
|