Secular Blasphemy
all the news I see fit to print

 

BLOGS:
BLOGS IN NORWEGIAN
BLOG SERVICES:


Subscribe to "Secular Blasphemy" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  25. august 2006


Anti-Semtic cartoon by Mette Hellenes.

I had hoped Norway's self-proclaimed cultural elite had reached rock bottom with Jostein Gaarder's vicious anti-Semitic article, as well as Finn Graff's caricature of Ehud Olmert as a Nazi KZ-camp guard. Unfortunately, that has not been the case. The culture-elitist (and far left) newspaper Morgenbladet printed a caricature by cartoonist Mette Hellenes, who has a column called Kebbelife, showing a Hasidic Jew in traditional clothing shooting everybody in his way (you see a detail above, and a fuller version in Dagbladet). The victims appear to be Palestinian Arabs, men, women and children.

The childishly crude dialogue, in Norwegian, has the Hasidic man saying (in order): "What in hell are you doing? Stealing gasoline?!!", "Take that! - for stealing!", "This is for the gasoline!", "This is for the gasoline tank!", "And this is for destroying a bit of my hat!" and finally "And this is for throwing sand on my curly hair!" In the background, you can see a bystander saying "Stop, what are you doing?" before himself getting shot. The cartoons are interspersed with "bang!" (as I guess you can make out) every time the man shoots at everyone in sight.

A shocked Odd Einar Dørum, Norway's former Justice Minister (Venstre, Liberal Party), brought the cartoon along to the publishing house Aschehoug's traditional garden party for the country's cultural elite (yes, it is portrayed as such), and showed it around. I am pleased to inform that at least this time, the condemnations were pretty unanimous. Dørum said:

- I recognised something I know from my childhood. I was born in 1943, and this reminds me of Jew-caricatures from the 30s.

Jahn Otto Johansen was even more explicit:

This is classic anti-Semitism, exactly as it was in Der Stürmer.

However, the editor of Morgenbladet Alf van der Hagen defended cartoonist Mette Hellenes, by arguing she portrays everybody negatively, even herself.

She portrays people who are totally disgusting. This is her expression, and one must see the drawing in that context.

It is deeply disturbing that an editor of a newspaper can make such an excuse. There is a huge difference between drawing a non-flattering caricature of an individual person, and even there artists should be careful about racial stereotypes, and drawing a crude racial stereotype of an abstract person serving as a representative for an entire ethnic group.

It is certainly true that this is a caricature Julius Streicher's Der Stürmer would have been proud to print, and that any modern newspaper should be deeply ashamed to even consider for publication.


6:48:03 PM    comment []  trackback []

This stupid guy was approached by the police over an intoxicated domestic dispute, and he was lucky to be visited by the most patient cop ever (video). The wife (presumably) of the offending drunk caught the events that transpired, including a very well-deserved tazing.

Hat tip Jelly.


3:15:31 PM    comment []  trackback []

Media all over the world reported that Israeli aircraft had targeted two Lebanese Red Cross ambulances with missile fire, causing widespread condemnations for war crimes. ZombieTime has done a thorough investigation of the evidence available, and concludes it was a hoax. The arguments look very persuasive to me, but look for yourself.

The Lebanon war has not been a good one for the international media.

PS: Must-see video: All your fakes are belong to us.


12:43:07 PM    comment []  trackback []

German Chancellor Angela Merkel calls the Iranian counter-proposal "unsatisfactory" as it fails to include any answer to the demand for an enrichment freeze. All six nations are reportedly "disappointed" with the response.

The Security Council has set a deadline of next Thursday for Iran to freeze enrichment — a possible pathway to nuclear arms — and the six nations offering to talk to Iran say such a step must precede the start of any discussions.

But the diplomats said the 25-page document does not directly suggest an enrichment moratorium even after negotiations start.

Instead, it includes only a vague reference to a willingness to discuss all aspects of the country's nuclear program, said the diplomats who spoke from two European capitals and asked for anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the confidential proposal.

They said the reaction among the six powers — France, Germany, Britain, Russia, the United States and China — was one of disappointment and even anger that Tehran would not consider a suspension of uranium enrichment as a precondition for any new talks.

It will be interesting to see what Russia and China will eventually conclude on this matter.

One of the diplomats told AP that the lack of Iranian flexibility on enrichment would likely leave even Russia and China no choice but to ultimately endorse U.N. sanctions against Iran. Moscow and Beijing previously have steadily put the brakes on U.S-backed efforts to punish Tehran quickly but have stipulated that Iran must freeze enrichment.

We'll see if that holds.


12:22:53 PM    comment []  trackback []

Car flip.

This amusing position ended the drive for a 38-year-old woman in Steinsviken in Bergen today. She drove off the road and landed in the underpass.

She was not injured in the accident, except possibly her pride.

From local Bergensavisen.


1:02:59 AM    comment []  trackback []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2006 Jan Haugland.
Last update: 01.09.2006; 05:01:40.

Jan Haugland.
August 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Jul   Sep

Google

Library

My articles

Sport

"Can you hear me, Maggie Thatcher?"

9/11 conspiracies

Debunking Michael Meacher

Lost and Found

Don't mess with my false memories

Afterlives Inc

Does the soul exist? (Part 2)

Love to Hate

Why Anti-Americanism?

Marital Bliss?

The bridezilla from hell (pt 2)

anti-gun nut

Michael Moore's unconvincing defence

The Just Not Right Dept

'Anthropic principle' debunk

Religion

Is it right because God says so?

Humour

Hu's on first

Words, words, words

The lost philological battles

History

So you think you are having a bad time?

Nutrition

Living on sunlight, or feeding on gullability?