Secular Blasphemy
'Oh Lord, protect us from the Fury of the Norsemen.'
- Medieval prayer

 

BLOGS:
BLOGS IN NORWEGIAN
BLOG SERVICES:


Subscribe to "Secular Blasphemy" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  10. august 2007


Speaking of treason, one Neil Clark, writing in The Guardian, is trying to hijack a Norwegian word we are not bloody proud of, but I still think it's my duty to deny him the right to using it.

The word is Quisling, named after our infamous low-life scum Nazi who collaborated with the occupying Germans and acted as prime minister of Norway during World War II. We shot him after the war. Clark is comparing every opponent of Saddamism or al-Qaedaism in Iraq to this arch-traitor. These were people who fought and died to have the despotism scourge extinguished until the US and Britain stepped in to help them (much as the same allies eventually freed Norway in 1945) .

A group of pro-war bloggers is playing a prominent role in a campaign to grant asylum to Iraqis who have been working as translators for the British forces in Iraq. Not all who back the campaign were in favour of the war, but some of its most strident supporters are.

Harry's Place, the favourite watering hole of the pro-war "left", urges its readers to write to their MPs over the issue. "If government policy has not changed by the time parliament returns from the summer recess, we will need to think about a face-to-face lobbying effort," the site warns.

Other pro-war bloggers are backing the campaign, too, including the arch-hawk Stephen Pollard, who once labelled opponents of the Iraq war as "mindless, deluded or malevolent". And yesterday, the Harry's Place contributor Adam Lebor, via an opinion piece in The Times, offered "advice" to Gordon Brown, exhorting him to overrule the bureaucratic "desk murderers" who would deny the Iraqis rights of entry.

I am very disgusted that such people even exist in Britain. The Tower isn't what it used to be.

I will, however, strongly argue that the Iraqis who have, while risking their lives, aided the British forces in Iraq, surely deserve to be granted asylum in Britain. The country has certainly granted entry to far less deserving people than them.

As for Neil Clark, he is not even prominent enough to deserve to be called a Quisling. He does, however, really deserve to live under the Taliban-like rule he so wishes on the Iraqis.

Corrected: Afghanistan vs Iraq confusion. Yeah I know. Don't blog too late in the evening.


11:42:43 PM    comment []  trackback []

It is my clear conviction that anyone having the terms "truth" or "peace" as part of their recognised title or movement, are total morons or traitors, or more likely, a combination of the two. Case in point: Hugo Chavez' good friend Cindy Sheehan.

Citing her son as inspiration, a tearful Cindy Sheehan announced her candidacy Thursday for the U.S. House of Representatives.

The anti-war activist is running as an independent against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has represented San Francisco in Congress since 1987.

"The country is ripe for a change," said Sheehan, who spoke at a podium with her son's photograph attached to it. "It's going to start right here and right now."

Pelosi's seat is pretty safe, unless Sheehan actually manages to create a Republican backlash.


11:23:55 PM    comment []  trackback []

Michael Asher on DailyTech brings some astonishing news on NASA's silent correction of historical temperature data for the USA.

My earlier column this week detailed the work of a volunteer team to assess problems with US temperature data used for climate modeling. One of these people is Steve McIntyre, who operates the site climateaudit.org. While inspecting historical temperature graphs, he noticed a strange discontinuity, or "jump" in many locations, all occurring around the time of January, 2000. 

These graphs were created by NASA's Reto Ruedy and James Hansen (who shot to fame when he accused the administration of trying to censor his views on climate change). Hansen refused to provide McKintyre with the algorithm used to generate graph data, so McKintyre reverse-engineered it. The result appeared to be a Y2K bug in the handling of the raw data.

McKintyre notified the pair of the bug; Ruedy replied and acknowledged the problem as an "oversight" that would be fixed in the next data refresh.

NASA has now silently released corrected figures, and the changes are truly astounding. The warmest year on record is now 1934. 1998 (long trumpeted by the media as record-breaking) moves to second place.  1921 takes third. In fact, 5 of the 10 warmest years on record now all occur before World War II.  

This correction does not affect global temperature changes all that much. But who knows what has been going on around the world...

Hot Air notes:

Remarkable, isn’t it, how we’re assured that this is the most important scientific issue of our time and yet one of the basic calculations from which the evidence is derived has to be reverse engineered from the data in order to check it. Can we at least get some peer review before we build the ark?

This is more than mildly disturbing.


7:03:01 AM    comment []  trackback []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2007 Jan Haugland.
Last update: 01.09.2007; 12:35:21.

Jan Haugland.
Pajamas Media Correspondent
August 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Jul   Sep

Google

Library

My articles

Sport

"Can you hear me, Maggie Thatcher?"

9/11 conspiracies

Debunking Michael Meacher

Lost and Found

Don't mess with my false memories

Afterlives Inc

Does the soul exist? (Part 2)

Love to Hate

Why Anti-Americanism?

Marital Bliss?

The bridezilla from hell (pt 2)

anti-gun nut

Michael Moore's unconvincing defence

The Just Not Right Dept

'Anthropic principle' debunk

Religion

Is it right because God says so?

Humour

Hu's on first

Words, words, words

The lost philological battles

History

So you think you are having a bad time?

Nutrition

Living on sunlight, or feeding on gullability?