Blasphemous Metablogging
Secular Blasphemy is blogging about blogging

 









































Subscribe to "Blasphemous Metablogging" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  2. februar 2003


Hold onto your blogs, the AOLers are coming

"If recent rumours are to be believed, AOL is getting ready to add blogging to the homepage services it offers users in the next month or so. It's a sign of how far these regularly updated pages of web links with personal comment have come in the past five years." (The Guardian)

I know it's getting boring when old farts complain about recent developments and whine about how much better everything was in the past. To avoid that, I will make a preemptive strike, and predict the onslaught of AOLer blogs will be the end of blogspace as we know it.

Well, not really.

However, I remember the entry of massive hordes of AOL users on the Internet as the second, and decisive, disaster that hit old Usenet. Originally, most participants on Usenet discussion groups were academics or computer professionals. With the danger of sounding elitist, this did ensure some quality by weeding out the worst crazies and the most ignorant. When the online service Delphi first started giving normal users access to the Internet, the result was that almost all Usenet discussion groups erupted into flamewars over how clueless Delphi users were. This was nothing, of course, comparing to what happened when AOL opened up to Usenet access some time later.

Currently, to be a blogger requires a bit of initiative. Blogs are still on the fringe of the net, so it takes a bit of pioneering spirit to even hear about blogs, find some blogs to read them, not to mention setting up your own and start writing in it on a regular basis. When AOL starts pushing the blogging service to their millions of members, this will be at an end. After seeing the home pages of the typical AOL user, I am not optimistic about how AOL blogs will look like.

To force myself to be optimistic: The good spin is of course that this move will give more attention to blogging generally. This, again, can translate into more readers. It can also mean that some AOL users, lo and behond, turns out to be good bloggers.


2:23:48 PM    comment []

Memetrace

I wonder if the lgf blog's parody of an Arab reaction to the Israeli astronaut in space (which I wrote about below) will be picked up by more news sources after the Columbia disaster yesterday.

Here's a google news search I set up to follow the development. Only two hits so far.

Take a look at one recent reader comment to ChronWatch's item about the parody, originally posted well before the tragedy: "Whatcha think NOW, smartasses?"

Ouch!


1:59:50 PM    comment []

You googled me in all caps

Somebody just found the old story about the unlucky Norwegian stand up comedian Thomas Giertsen, who broke his arm when he stupidly decided to arm wrestle with a woman in the audience.

The google search ARMWRESTLING WOMEN STORIES looked pretty well tailored to find that particular entry. But please lose the caps lock the next time.


1:20:54 PM    comment []

Columbia disaster: bring on the conspiracy theories

The loss of the space shuttle Columbia and the tragic deaths of the crew of seven will have less impact than the Challenger disaster in 1986. I remember very well how the loss of Challenger, dramatically exploding just after takeoff, by some Americans was compared to the JFK assasination. It was one of those events that everybody could remember for ever where they were, and what they were doing, at the time when they first heard about it.

Post 9/11, it takes more. While the loss of Columbia may continue to dominate the news for some days, maybe weeks, the word is already out that this should be a signal to move on. CBSNews summed up the comments on its message boards by saying "By far the most common sentiment our writers expressed is that the space program ought to go on, despite the losses."

And while every disaster that hits America is the subject of countless conspiracy theories and speculations, I think the loss of Columbia would have passed into obscurity in the annals of conspiracy theories if it wasn't for one very crucial fact: this was the first space flight ever by an Israeli astronaut, Colonel Ilan Ramon. Everything Israeli and Jewish attracts conspiracy theorists like flies to honey.

Some theorists have already pointed out some remarkable coincidences. The US is, or so it appears, at the brink of war with Iraq. The close US-Israeli relationship is at least at the core of Arab tension with the US over the Iraq question, and very possibly a major reason why the US wants to intervene in the first place.

Immediate popular reaction in Baghdad on Saturday to the loss of the U.S. space shuttle Columbia and its seven-member crew -- including the first Israeli in space -- was that it was God's retribution.

Reuters just reported the Iraqi reaction to the disaster, and to nobody's surprise it was gleeful and tasteless:

""We are happy that it broke up," government employee Abdul Jabbar al-Quraishi said.

"God wants to show that his might is greater than the Americans. They have encroached on our country. God is avenging us," he said."

imageHowever, Iraq has not even been able to shoot down a single manned coalition aircraft that has been patrolling the northern and southern "no fly zones" in its own country for years, dispite having fired at them countless times. To target the returning space shuttle, 200,000 feet above Texas, is beyond any weapon known to be possessed by any nation on Earth, with the possible exception of the US itself. It is surely beyond the capabilities of Iraq or Al Qaeda. If there is any speculation that this was an act of terror, which is denied by all officials, it would have to be sabotage.

While it is extremely unlikely at this stage that the break-up of the oldest space shuttle, first launched in 1981, is anything but a technological mishap, this shuttle flight in particular, at this time, would have been a very obvious target for terrorists. And that is all the "evidence" conspiracy theorists will need.

The components are already there. Just pick and mix, add credulity, and you can have your own post-shuttle conspiracy theory. Serve lukewarm.

In the 1980s, while the world was still tolerant to Saddam Hussein's outragousness, Israel was deeply concerned about Iraq building a nuclear reactor at Osirak  Colonel Ilan Ramon, who later should become Israel's first astronaut and who tragically died yesterday, was the youngest of eight pilots who participated in the daring 1981 Israeli air strike that devastated the reactor and no doubt is a major reason that Saddam Hussein does not have nukes today.

Also, the Columbia disintegrated and fell down over Texas, the home state of President Bush, the main personal force behind the drive to oust Saddam Hussein.

Naturally, there is enough material just in the above to drive conspiracy nuts for days.

There is more, of course.

Vought Aircraft Industries, owned by the Carlyle Group, made heat tiles for the shuttle . Underreported but still widely known: the Bush family and a serious number of major conservative officials, like former US secretary of state James Baker and former UK prime minster John Major, are signed up to promote the Carlycle group and its powerful clients.

Under executive orders, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which from March 1 will sort under Tom Ridge, the new Homeland Security secretary, is coordinating the federal side of the response to this tragedy. Expect to see Ridge and the word "cover-up" in lots of conspiracy theory texts in the future.

And, perhaps for the first time, blogs may be prominent in news coverage of a major disaster. Look at this perfect parody of an alleged Arab protest in Charles Johnson's little green footballs blog. The parody, written at the time of Columbia's launch, has Arabs protesting Col. Ramon's presence in space:

"This is surely but the first step towards complete and outright illegal Zionist occupation of space," said Arab League spokesman Abr Souffla. "We will not sit idly by and permit this usurpation of a cosmos that by birthright belongs to the Palestinian people and their Arab and Muslim brethren."

And, in a line that could be interpreted as strangely prophetic, if you really believe in conspiracies, the piece continues:

"In Gaza City today, thousands of Palestinians marched in the streets, many firing weapons into the air. "With our blood and our souls, we will strike the orbital Zionists," chanted the protestors. Sheikh Yermani-Makr, appearing on Palestinian television, said, "It is not enough that the unbelievers have come on our land, but now they also take our heavens? How can this be permitted?""

This parody received much attention after the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz picked up the story a few days later and reprinted it, apparently thinking it was real.

Fact and fiction often makes strange bedfellows.


1:10:45 PM    comment []

...and it's here!

The new, exciting issue of The Occoquan Inquirer, also called Virtual Occoquan, with last week's highlights from Salon blogging. Should not be missed.

Mark picked my article about Nelson Mandela for this week's VO issue.


10:15:55 AM    comment []


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2003 Jan Haugland.
Last update: 02.03.2003; 03:36:01.

February 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28  
Jan   Mar