A speculative theory on latest "smoking gun"
Are the disclosures from the Iraqi defector Abu Hamdi Mahmoud and Ms Nicholson's information recently given to Mr Blix in any way related?
Why was the story about the Iraqi bodyguard first published in the Jerusalem Post and then apparently yanked (see Kane's)? Why isn't this story, assuming the sources are half-credible, making headlines across the world right now?
Here is a speculative theory about what has happened, that I just posted in a comment in Rayne's:
The defector drops into Mossad's lap. Sharon contacts Bush about it, gloating about the catch. The US administration goes pale, realising that it will look really bad if the "smoking gun" leading to an attack comes from Israel. Thus, they twist Sharon's arm and make him accept that the information is being dropped in Blix' lap through a British EU parliamentary.
However, this pisses off some Israeli intelligence officers big time, who makes sure the story is leaked to give them credit for the job.
This, of course, assumes that those two "smoking guns" being from the same source. We'll have to wait and see.
PS: Don't miss Rayne's latest note on the British parliamentary, indeed Baroness Emma Nicholson. I must learn to do my homework more systematically. Whatever the case, this does not weaken my theory.
Update: Curiouser and curiouser. A webpage of dubious credibility, belonging to talk show host Jeff Rense, posted the information about Abu Hamdi Mahmoud's defection to Israel on January 28st.
8:59:09 PM
|