The stars say: NYT needs to shape up
How on earth can a supposedly respectable newspaper like the New York Times come up with the idea of writing an analysis of the democratic candidates based on their star charts? Didn't the liberal press, of which the NYT is a card-carrying (standard-bearing?) member, poke fun at the Reagans for their astrology connection?
Erin Sullivan, NYT''s house astrologist, writes an immense amount of self-evident punditry about the candidates, and attributes it to her star chart reading. It would be so much more useful if the NYT staff gave her the birth dates of the candidates first, without letting her know who was who. You think Clark would be called a "master strategist" or Kucinich "the peaceful warrior" solely based on the celestial positions at their births? Nah, me neither.
Via Volokh.
1:18:39 AM
|