Pipeline
You've hit the Pipeline. Tap in...

 



















The WeatherPixie


Subscribe to "Pipeline" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Tuesday, September 16, 2003


Wesley!

Well, he's in.  It's not quite official until tomorrow, but Wesley Clark is all but in the Democratic race for the nomination.

Is he too late?  You hear and read that thread, no doubt planted by the Dean and Kerry camps and their various hopefuls.  But how can Clark be too late to enter a race that has no clear leader, either in terms of support or money?  That's like saying a movie that comes out in the 11th month of the Oscar season can't be considered for the award.  Well, maybe it's not exactly like that, but I don't think Wes Clark's campaign is going to derail because of his late start.

What I do wonder is how much the average voter knows about Wes Clark.  Certainly, people following the race closely at this point know who he is.  I guess my feeling is that Clark's story is an incredibly compelling one, especially compared to a certain Yale graduate's.  If you want an entertaining rundown of that comparison, check out the August 26th entry of Hyperbole, courtesy of learned Southern Gent Paul Hayes.  Clark is basically a modern-day Ike Eisenhower, and General Badass.  How can the media not slobber all over themselves for this guy?  No, the media will make sure that the public knows good and well who Wes Clark is by the time the dye is cast.

Beyond that, what can opponents say about Clark?  They can say he doesn't have experience in a governing role, and that would be correct.  But he does have military and diplomatic experience, something that many past Presidential candidates could not boast.

I need to know a bit more about where Clark stands.  He has hinted that he thought the recent tax cuts were irresponsible, that he favors some limited affirmative action, and that he would push to repeal Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy because it doesn't work. 

Obviously, it's early, but I can't help but wonder if this is what's happening:

The Bush team capitalized on 9/11 for political gain, and turned it into a massive flag-waving demonstration that continues (though with less fervor than before) today.  They have made strength, military might and heroism the headliners in this country, and have played to that by dressing up a known dodger of military service in flight gear to have him play the role they made Americans thirsty for.

And now, here comes the real deal, not just a John Kerry who served his country admirably on a tough river rat patrol boat in 'Nam, but a guy who did all of that and so much more, a guy who has the reportedly unabashed respect of U.S. military people everywhere.

Is it just me, or is Wes Clark Bush's worst nightmare, even without a platform?  Americans want strength and leadership?  Wes Clark is, by all accounts, a STRONG LEADER.

This race just got a lot more fun for a lot of Democrats.


2:52:31 PM    Say what?[]

A New Variable

The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse has published a study that finds that kids who smoke cigarettes are more than 14 times more likely to smoke pot.

I don't know many people who would be surprised by that finding.

But here's the part that I thought was interesting, quoting from the StarTribune:

The study focusing on 12- to 17-year-olds also found those who smoke cigarettes are six times likelier to be able to buy marijuana in an hour or less and 18 times likelier to say most of their friends smoke pot.

What difference does it make how quickly a kid can buy pot?  Is there some magic threshold about being able to buy pot in "an hour or less", as opposed to, say, three hours?  Does that indicate how at-risk a kid is, or simply how well-connected they are?  Is this just intended to make over-the-hill stoners jealous at how easily kids today can score drugs? 

I can only think that the question is asked as a way of demonstrating to adults how different the world is today.  Drugs aren't hard to find, apparently, especially if you're a teen smoker.  And if you're not a teen smoker, and have been frustrated by the agonizingly long lead times in your own quest to find pot, this study clearly proves you need to work hard to cultivate better relationships with the smokers at your school. 

If you are interested in some very detailed, dedicated and critical analysis of the black hole that is the U.S. War On Drugs, check out Drug War Rant, a Salon blog run by Pete Guither.  The War On Drugs is one of the great human tragedies of modern America, in addition to being socially and fiscally destructive, and Guither offers ample evidence to support that conclusion.  Not to mention that it's just a failed policy, a war that is being lost on nearly every level.


10:17:17 AM    Say what?[]


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2003 Doug Hennessee.
Last update: 9/30/2003; 11:51:54 AM.

September 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Aug   Oct