Pipeline
You've hit the Pipeline. Tap in...

 



















The WeatherPixie


Subscribe to "Pipeline" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

 

 

  Friday, September 19, 2003


Are Shaun Alexander and the Seahawks for real?  The Rams find out on Sunday.

The Seer Sees Week 3 of the NFL

Ah, Week 3.  The first week of the byes, the first time several teams hit the road.  Week 3 is when we start to build a bit of a history and context for each team, and when it starts to undeniably feel like football season.

The Seer ended up at an unremarkable 8-8 record last week, which means that if I were actually laying down money on these games I would have come out behind because of the vig or rake or whatever they call the book's fee for placing the bet.  Which is why I targeted a 58% success rate this year, because that would represent a minimal profit. 

But really, let's say I'm laying $20 on each game, something I would be reluctant to do on even one game, but let's just say that I'm doing that.  There are 256 games in an NFL season.  That's $5120 in the course of a year.  That's a lot of money to put at risk to win, what, around $300 bucks if I bet every game at $20 and roll with 58%, which would be highly unlikely.

Of course, it's not likely that I would suck along at anything less than 40%, either, which means that the most I could likely lose is around $500 ss long as I wasn't making stupid bets, and the most likely scenario given my average prognostication talents is that I would be somewhere between up and down $100. 

So, clearly, I wouldn't be laying money down for the sake of the money.  It would have to be just for the thrill of having some action on the games.  A close friend of Pipeline does exactly that for most all sports, not for the money, but for the action.  For him, it makes the games more meaningful.  I can certainly see why it would be more meaningful in a given game, but if you're playing all the games (and I would have to to minimize risk), I guess the appeal would be gone for me.  Besides, if I'm more or less maintaining a sports blog throughout the year, and belong to multiple baseball, basketball and football fantasy leagues, I probably don't need to do much to make things more "meaningful".

And yet here we are, making picks for Week 3...

Week 3

Jets @ Patriots, Patriots by 6.5

Big line.  The Patriots bounced back big-time against a Moribund and Stunned (which should have been Pavement's follow-up to Slanted and Enchanted) Eagles team.  The Jets, meanwhile, can't move the ball, and they haven't been able to use Curtis Martin much.  The Seer doesn't think the Jets will threaten the Patriots, but that big line scares us a bit.

The Seer Sees: Patriots beat the spread

Steelers @ Bengals, Steelers by 6

Another big line, but it's the Bengals, right?  Well, the Bengals played the Raiders tough on the road, and they might be starting to believe that they can really improve.  The Steelers also always have trouble in Cincy.  And yet, despite getting smacked in KC last week, the Seer was impressed with the Steelers on offense and defense.  The Bengals don't have Priest Holmes, and they don't have a special teams wizard like Dante Hall.  The Seer likes the Bengals, but...

The Seer Sees: Steelers cover

Jaguars @ Colts, Colts by 7.5

Quite a statement game by the Colts last week, but their M.O. is all about letting down, isn't it?  The Jags aren't a good team.  The Seer has picked them twice against the spread, but you know the old saying: Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, fuck you!  Of course, the Colts have fooled the Seer twice as well.  Can't we get at least a little moral clarity with our parity?

The Seer Sees: Colts cover

Vikings @ Lions, Vikings by 3.5

Tough line.  The Vikings are healthy, though, and should improve if Culpepper can hang onto the ball.  BIG if.  Still, their confidence is very high.  The Lions are improved, but they can't stop the run, which puts them in a real tough position: dedicate an extra defender to Randy Moss, as the Bears did, or keep that defender home to help against the run?  Either way, they lose.

The Seer Sees: Vikings cover

Saints @ Titans, Titans by 5

Great matchup.  The Seer admits that Tennessee's egg last week in Indy shattered their confidence in the boys from Nashville.  And the Saints, who knows?  McNair's already banged up.  That spread is just too big.

The Seer Sees: Saints beat the spread

Buccaneers @ Falcons, Bucs by 3.5

Are you kidding?  After the Bucs loss on Sunday?  The Falcons couldn't be catching Tampa at a worse time.  Somebody's gonna pay.  Somebody named the Falcons.

The Seer Sees: Buccaneers cover

Chiefs @ Texans, Chiefs by 8

This is trouble.  The danger here is that the Chiefs will establish a large lead, and then pull Priest Holmes and just eat up the clock with Larry Johnson, making the score closer than the game really was.  But bear in mind that Houston is a second-year team, and very new teams lack depth, and depth is critical in the special teams game.  Which means that Dante Hall, in a Texas homecoming, could have a HUGE day.  That might be worth 8 points all by itself. 

The Seer Sees: Chiefs cover

Giants @ Redskins, Redskins by 2

Tough, tough game.  The Giants were flat-out embarrassed Monday night.  The Skins were way down early to Atlanta, and the Skins took advantage of a banged-up Falcons secondary to come back.  No such luck against the Gents.  The Seer can't see Spurrier and crew jumping out 3-0, and the Giants are going to be desperate.  It's early, but coach Jim Fassell is putting all of his chips in.

The Seer Sees: Giants beat the spread

Packers @ Cardinals, Packers by 8

If the Cardinals get down early, they'll fold.  Anquan Boldin has been a pleasant surprise for Arizona, and the Packer secondary hasn't been great, but come on.  This spread could be 12 and we'd still call it the same way...

The Seer Sees: Packers cover

Rams @ Seahawks, Seahawks by 3

The Seer thinks this is the game of the afternoon.  The Rams are getting better, and now they have their best QB in the lineup.  The Seahawks are still a mystery, though the Saints win was certainly quality.  A win here merits serious attention.  But the Seer thinks the Rams make this close.

The Seer Sees: Rams beat the spread

Ravens @ Chargers, pick 'em

The Chargers have disappointed so far, but they have played Denver and KC, two decent teams.  The Ravens lost big to the Steelers and then had a Jamal Lewis Prediction Party against the Browns, who seem to not be good at all.  San Diego got torched by Clinton Portis last week, so Jamal Lewis could have another big day.

The Seer Sees: Ravens

Browns @ 49ers, 49ers by 7

Are the Browns that bad?  Yeah, we guess they probably are.  The 49ers made last week's Rams game very close, and should have tied it up.  No mistakes this time around. 

The Seer Sees: 49ers cover

Bills @ Miami, Miami by 3

No respect!  That's the battlecry in the Bills lockerroom this week upon seeing this line.  Ricky Williams may find the up-the-middle running a bit tougher against Brewer/Patriot/Bill Sam Adams and co.  Drew Bledsoe traditionally has had success against Miami's DB's, and Sam Madison and Patrick Surtain seem to have slipped a bit this year.  No respect!

The Seer Sees: Bills cover

Raiders @ Broncos, Broncos by 5

This is the big Monday night game, and it's a good one.  The Raiders just look lifeless and old to me, but they'll be up for this game.  The Seer thinks the Broncos are playing with fire with Jake (the Fake) Plummer, but Clinton Portis is a chest-bruised running machine.  Still, the Broncos haven't really played a good team yet, and the Raiders, even if a bit older and slower, are still a good team.  Monday Night will also keep this game closer than the spread.

The Seer Sees: Raiders beat the spread

Well, there you have it.  Have a safe and fun weekend.


3:22:26 PM    Say what?[]

Quick!  Tell Me About Digital Cameras

This is an emergency call to Loyal Pipeline Readers.  I have caught Jane in a moment of weakness, and the upshot is that we might be able to get a digital camera if I can educate myself about digital cameras before Sunday.

Backstory: There are a ton of Linus statues around St. Paul as a celebration of the life of St. Paul native Charles Schulz.  The statues, most of which are super cool, are coming down after Sunday.  We always said that if they ever put Linus statues up, that as the parents of a child named Linus, we owed it ourselves and the Laws of Kitsch and Coincidence and Synchronicity (Laws which should never, ever be broken) that we should get pictures of Linus with Linus.  Especially since we strongly suspect that Linus thinks these statues all have something to do with him personally.

Well, there are literally dozens of these things, all over town.  Do you really want four rolls of your kid next to a statue?  No!  This project is made for a digital camera.  Not to mention the other huge benefits of a digital camera, obviously one of which is Pipeline.

She asked me if I knew enough about digital cameras to make a purchase before Sunday.  I naturally scoffed at such a notion.  What's to know?

HELP!  I know so precious little about digital cameras.  How many pixels do I need?  What do I need to look out for, and what features will I not use?  What brands?

Oh yeah, and Jane said she wasn't going to spend over $250, which I think renders most discussion of "features" pretty moot.  But I know we can get something in that price range, even if it's not the greatest.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.


1:43:51 PM    Say what?[]

TPM Interviews Joseph Wilson

There is an amazing (and long) interview with Ambassador Joseph Wilson on Talking Points Memo.  Wilson is best known for his role in establishing that the Niger/Iraq uranium deal was bogus, but his knowledge and history with Iraq and Bosnia gives him a unique perspective on what is happening there today.  If you're at all interested in following the mess that is Iraq these days, you should check it out.

The Ambassador's first words when asked about our position right now: "Well, I think we're fucked." 


11:06:28 AM    Say what?[]

Bizarro Media World For Iraqis

This is not a reprise of the Iraq/media bias discussion Sean and I beat into the ground the last couple days.  It is instead just a thought, based on a headline I saw yesterday about Iraqis and the way a part of their world has changed:

Can you imagine what it must be like for most Iraqis to begin to wade into a non-Saddam controlled media?

After having their news severely censored and tailored by Saddam for generations, Iraqis are beginning to get wider access to outside media, including Westernized media.  How odd must it be for them to enter what is by any standard a more "truthful" media world, only to find that there are still so many shades of gray, truths and half-truths on all sides of that new world? 

They go from always being fed a line, to never being quite sure when they are being fed a line.  Is it more destructive to know that 100% of what you hear is spin or outright garbage, or to know that 20% is, but not be able to readily discern which 20%?


10:13:44 AM    Say what?[]

Party Time!

Last night was one of those nights we all remember from our own childhood, one of those nights you couldn't or wouldn't sleep, and you ended up hanging out with the adults far, far past your bedtime only because both parents were hoping the other one would take you back up the two flights of stairs.

I won that battle.  So as Jane was taking Linus up at 10:00, he asked, "What are we going to do?"  Exasperated at the question, Jane blurted out, "We're going to have a party." 

In a hopeful and slightly excited voice, Linus says, "Really?"

Jane shot him down so fast.  "No!  You're going to bed.  Why would we be having a party now?"

Man, that's just cruel.  Why not just tell him he's going to get ice cream and go play at McDonald's Playland, too?  Jane said he had to start learning about sarcasm sometime, which is true enough, but I always assumed it would be me giving those lessons. 


10:06:15 AM    Say what?[]


Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2003 Doug Hennessee.
Last update: 9/30/2003; 11:51:55 AM.

September 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Aug   Oct