Daddy Daycare
I was home with Linus and Lily yesterday. It was a planned vacation, a part of Jane's birthday present which allowed her to go thrift store shopping with friends on a day when Linus's daycare was closed.
Linus slept in, which gave me and Lily a chance to do some funny dances together. Our favorite song to dance to is "M'Lady", by Sly and the Family Stone, although we like to change the words to "M'Lily". After the dancing, it was time to change her diaper, which weighed about a pound or more because of it's super-saturation abilities. A one pound diaper can't be much fun when you don't even weigh 15 pounds. That would be like me or you wearing a wet, ten pound pair of underwear!
Soon, I was playing zone defense and trying to entertain them both. Lily spent time on the floor, working on her crawling. She also made intentional forward progress in her walker yesterday, which may have been a first.
Lunchtime came, and all we had to eat was Kraft macaroni and cheese. This was just fine with Linus, but he also requested that we have garlic bread with our lunch. Why not? Mac & cheese is pasta, after all.
After lunch, Linus and I spent most of our afternoon playing games while Lily napped. Ah, naps. I wanted one, and I wanted Linus to have one. I call for a national Siesta policy. We started with Candy Land. I had Candy Land when I was a kid. The game is the same, but they changed the way the board looks, like they do with all the games. Lord Licorice is just all wrong on this new board.
Anyway, Linus is a Candy Land assassin. We played two games, and in neither game was I within 30 spaces of winning at any given time. I decided that part of the problem with the game was that we weren't actually eating any candy. Since we were in a post-birthday, post-Valentine's Day Chocolate Honeymoon, I asked Linus if he wanted some candy. He gave me a blank look, like he was trying to tell if I was just joking, but he saw soon enough that I was deadly serious about the candy. "OK!"
We did a taste test of two different kinds of almond bark that we bought Jane at a fine chocolatier. One was milk chocolate, the other was dark. Both were delicious, but as I savored the chalky-smooth bite of the dark chocolate, I learned something remarkable. That is: I much prefer dark chocolate. Why is this remarkable? Because I've been eating chocolate enthusiastically for over 30 years, and only yesterday did I realize that I actually prefer dark chocolate, at least as far as your higher-end chocolates go. Dark chocolate just has more initial and lasting bite and flavor. Certainly, milk chocolate goes better with certain things, like peanut butter or caramel. But as a single item, dark chocolate is just superior, and with certain nuts or mints it can't and won't be topped.
I emerged from my dark chocolate haze by wondering what Linus preferred. We did a taste test and an interview, and he, too is a dark chocolate man. I told Jane about all this last night, and then she thoughtfully sampled both the milk and dark chocolate, and she agreed that after years of loving chocolate, the dark is actually better. Why did this sneak up on us in this way?
I remember when I was a kid, my dad would always get the Hershey's Special Dark bar. And I would always get mad at him, because it was that weird chocolate that I didn't like. Which meant he got more of the candy, which was probably not much of a coincidence from his point of view. Ah, if only I could time-travel, I could recoup my fair share of that Special Dark chocolate.
After Candy Land, we played some Toy Story 2 Yahtzee Jr., a bastardization of the Yahtzee game we all know and love, but one which works pretty well for kids. More or less, you only concentrate on the top section of the scorecard, and the dice only go up to five, with the sixth side being a wildcard (the "Woody"). At one point in the game, I switched what I was going for, from "Potato" to "Buzz". This didn't sit well with Linus at all, even though it's a perfectly legal move.
In the past, if something went wrong like that, he might say nothing, he might get angry, or he might even cry, depending on his mood. But yesterday, he did something different and hilarious. He picked up the rules sheet, and he said, "You can't do that. It says so right here." And then he pointed at a random spot on the instruction page, as though he had looked up the rule and was doing me the courtesy of showing me my error.
Naturally, I laughed.
That didn't go over well, but instead of getting angry, as he usually would do if I laughed at something he did when he was trying to be serious, he got even more serious. He turned the page on the directions and scanned them carefully; as he "read" them he kept saying, "Let's see here...". Then he pointed to the part of the directions that said, "Warning: Contains small parts. Not suitable for children under 3 years of age." And he said, "No, Daddy. It says so right here in the instructions. You can't do what you did."
I loved the appeal to authority and the respect for the rule of law, but I was confused about how I should handle this. Do I tell him he can't read? Do I encourage him to learn to read so that he can be a Rules Bastard for real someday? I ended up just telling him to trust me, it was OK, and he was kicking my ass anyway so why did he care? That worked.
After that, we shot some hoops on our Fisher Price rim. I showed him what a finger roll was and introduced him to the "airball" chant and the "toilet bowl" shot, also known as the Esther Rolle.
Then Lily woke up, happy and ready for more Cheerios and more floor time watching the boys bounce balls.
It was a great way to spend a day, but I don't know that I could do it every day. The kids would be great; it's the managing of the household that I wouldn't be able to do. If I had to entertain and feed them, all while doing housework...it just wouldn't work. I couldn't do it every day.
But it sure was fun having so much time with them together. By the next time I do it, they'll be completely different little people.
11:13:39 AM
|
|