Wednesday, March 03, 2004


Pipeline Poll: John Kerry's Running Mate

Lots of names are being thrown out.  Who do Pipeline readers believe John Kerry should choose as a running mate?

  • John Edwards-The Skinny: Edwards, being the second-place finisher to Kerry, has a natural association with the title.  And, given that Edwards has announced that he aspires to that office, as well as the fact that Kerry and Edwards gave each other a congratulatory round of fellatio after Edwards dropped from the race, this will be a popular pick.

 

  • John McCain-The Skinny: This would be delicious!  McCain, the maverick Republican that Republicans have long been saying isn't a real Republican, joining forces with Kerry as the ultimate "fuck you" to President Bush, whom McCain despises.  Both Kerry and McCain are big-time war heroes, while McCain is very much admired among the centrists and fiscal conservatives that Bush needs so badly to do well with, and is thus far failing.  But watch out!  Old tensions between the "River Rat" Kerry and the "Fly Boy" McCain could fracture this ticket.

 

  • Evan Bayh-The Skinny: Who?  Oh, he can deliver Indiana.  Thank God, somebody can finally deliver Indiana!  Here's the thing: People with names that sound like animal noises do not do well in elections.  Or are we forgetting the tragic examples of Fred Ribbit and Charles Oinkoink?

 

  • Bill Richardson-The Skinny: New Mexico governor.  The thinking is that...well, I'm not sure what the thinking is.  I think it has something to do with Area 51.  Is Area 51 even in New Mexico, or is that in Nevada?  It doesn't matter.  Personally, Pipeline would like to see the Dems stop playing this candyass strategy of consdering running mates from states with .5 electoral votes, like New Mexico.  If the guy were such a dynamo, he wouldn't be in New Mexico anymore.

 

  • Sam Nunn-The Skinny: Hell if I know.

 

  • Bob Graham-The Skinny: One a popular strategic choice, for his potential ability to deliver Florida, as well as for his ability to lend intelligence credibility to the ticket.  And of course, one of the reasons in the last sentence is a complete lie.  Besides that, who knows if Graham can really deliver Florida?  My guess is that after most Florida voters actually heard the guy in the debates, they'll immediately vote for someone else once they wake up.

 

  • Bill Clinton-The Skinny: John Kerry, despite reports by Matt Drudge, was not able to successfully consummate an illicit relationship with an intern despite what must have been numerous opportunities.  Who better to learn from than a master cocksman like Clinton, who knows all the nooks and crannies of the Oval Office, both figuratively and literally?  Pipeline wouldn't have considered this a serious suggestion until reading this editorial in the New York Times this morning.  It would be worth seeing just to read the headlines about Bill Safire's heart attack.

3:36:48 PM    Say what?[]

Trade Randy Moss?

There are rumors abound that the Vikings are considering dealing Randy Moss.  The discussions have gotten pretty specific, with the Dolphins rumored to be considering a package of some combination of defensive end Adewale Ogunleye, cornerback Sam Madison, receiver Chris Chambers and draft picks.  Word is, the Vikings are the ones doing the calling.

Who knows whether this has even a scintilla of truth?  But I will say this: Where there's smoke, there's Randy Moss.  This has all the elements of being a credible scenario, if not with the Dolphins necessarily, than generally speaking.  It makes sense on a lot of levels.  Yes, Moss is an unnatural talent, possibly the best player in the NFL today.

But where are the Vikings with Moss?  They will not be favored to win the NFC next season, and while anything is possible, the fact is this team has a LOT of holes to fill, including at CB, DE, and at WR.  They could fill the CB and DE holes with a Moss deal, and at least acquire another solid receiver so that they aren't any worse off there. 

Additionally, the draft picks would matter significantly.  If the Vikings were able to get a First and Second round pick in addition to the players, that would be very tempting.

What makes this deal possible is that the Vikings have a TON of room under the salary cap, more than any other team.  So, they can absorb the cap hit they would take from Moss's bonus, plus be able to absorb salaries of returning players.

The wild card is how moving Moss impacts Red McComb's desire to sell the team.  Moss has been a problem child in many ways off the field, but he has done nothing but produce on the field.  What's more, he has put people in the seats.  He single-handedly revived football interest in this town from solid to fanatical.  Local games were blacked out on occasion before he arrived; now the Purple are regular sellouts, and that matters to a guy like Red.

I say, Moss isn't getting any younger, and he hasn't shown the ability to take them places by himself.  They should explore their trade options fully.  If they can fill holes and get draft picks besides, given the current regime's excellent draft last year, this team could very well end up being better without Moss than they are with him.


3:05:06 PM    Say what?[]

Fantasy Baseball, Anyone?

Friend of Pipeline Brian E. and I are putting together an online fantasy baseball team, via Yahoo!.  Our emphasis is on using statistics which more accurately reflect "real" contributions to a team's success, and so instead of the standard AVG, HR, RBI, SB categories for offense, we are using categories like OPS, Runs scored, and a couple others I can't recall.  For pitching, no emphasis on Wins or Saves, since we'll use K/IP and OPS against. 

Anyway, we're looking to conduct the draft via email over the cours of however long it takes.  We have five people right now.  If you're interested follow this link.

Click the "Sign Up Now" or "Get Another Team" button and follow the links to "Join a Custom League". When prompted, enter the League ID# and password below.

League ID#: 50391

Password: nomorebush

Yeah, not very secret if we post the password, is it? 


2:51:58 PM    Say what?[]

Poker Tales With Wil Wheaton

Wil Wheaton has a great four part poker story up on his site, which Friend of Pipeline Martha linked to in an earlier comment section.  But it's so good, I'm linking to it here...


2:47:14 PM    Say what?[]

Caustic Caucus

We had too much on our plate last night.  Jane and I thought maybe we could just show up at our local caucus site, declare our support for our given candidate, John "Dead Man Walking" Edwards, and leave to go grocery shopping with the kids. 

Fat chance.

We got to within four blocks of the caucus location and hit bumper-to-bumper traffic, in a spot in St. Paul that never has that kind of traffic.  Eventually, we pulled up to Highland Park Jr. High, and the place was just a madhouse.  Driven by my urge to participate in the Democratic process, I made a snap decision to have Jane just drop Linus and I off, while she and Lily went shopping.  She said, "How will you get home?", and I blurted out that we would call her later.  With that, the boy and I entered our first Minnesota DFL caucus, with absolutely no idea what to expect.  (To clarify, "DFL" is really "Democrat" in Minnesota-speak.  It stands for Democratic-Farmer-Labor.)

It went down like this...

After consulting a map to see which ward and precinct we were in, we found our room, a standard-size middle school classroom which proceeded to pack in 102 people.  Linus and I grabbed some floor and scanned the crowd for people we knew.  There were only four, which tells you how neighborly and social we are.  It was also during this scan of the crowd of 102 that I was reminded of just how completely white Minnesota is.  There were two Hispanics, two Asians...and that was the minority count.  Bear in mind, this ain't the suburbs.  This is inside the city!  And it's the Democratic caucus!

There were three major orders of business that needed to be done last night:

  1. Cast Presidential Ballots;
  2. Elect delegates to go to the state DFL convention, where they will then divy up the electoral votes by representing the outcome of last night's precinct election, and;
  3. Present resolutions for the party platform

Now, the first thing you should know is that the turnout completely overwhelmed caucus organizers, who said it was the biggest turnout since Vietnam.  There were many, many people there who were energized to come out and be a part of turning back the Bush Administration by casting their vote for one of the Dem candidates.  Somebody said that they expected to have about 30 people in the room, so the turnout of 102 tells you plenty about the sentiments of the crowd.  Like me, they were primarily, probably even exclusively interested in casting a ballot for a Dem Presidential nominee.

And that was a problem for some people.  You see, a lot of the folks who show up at these caucuses are involved.  Yeah, they care about beating Bush, very much so, but they are probably much more involved in the party at a local level, like, who is the precinct chair, will our platform have an anti-stadium funding plank, who will get to go to the convention, and so forth.  These are people who want to tell you about the true Democratic spirit of Minnesota in great detail, and they are just as likely to want to give long tributes to Huburt H. Humphrey as they are to Paul Wellstone. 

We're talking hardcore local activists, here.  And so, when a vote came up to do the Presidential balloting first, there were rumblings from this crowd, which I'll call the DFL Army.  The DFL Army was dismayed that we would not do resolutions first, because, as one crusty gent bellowed, "That's the whole point of this thing.  We have to let them know what we stand for!  If you don't participate in the platform, you aren't really participating at all."  Then he turned to one of his fellow DFL infantry and said loudly, "If we do that balloting first, this room's going to empty out."

To which about 70% of the room nodded and said, "Yep."  Hey, it's not that we don't care about "what we stand for".  But there were 102 people in a small, hot room.  Do we really all need to sit there and hear these people talk about their pet amendment for the Arctic Wildlife Refuge?  What's more, does that have any bearing at all in this year, relative to the Presidential race?  No, it does not. 

So, a motion is raised to do the balloting first.  It was at this point that I realized how this thing was going to go.  They use a loose sort of parliamentary procedure.  Actually, they believe it to be a very tight sort of parliamentary procedure, but it's not, as we'll see in a moment.  The thing is, these DFL Army types are used to just arguing amongst themselves and having their little votes.  Now that there were 70 "outsiders" in the room, things were going to go a little different than they hoped.

The outsiders win.  We vote first.  This is good, because Linus is already getting bored.  So they pass out the slips and we write down our choices, and then they start to count.

In the meantime, a lot of hooey breaks out about things I don't care about.  Who will hold what offices?  Who will be a secretary?  Who this?  Who that?  And hey, wouldn't you know it, but a lot of the parliamentary procedure lawyers and DFL army and whatnot, they aren't volunteering for these positions.  In fact, nobody is volunteering.  Maybe they were too menial, I don't know.  Ultimately, a young couple is shamed into accepting the precinct chair positions, and are roundly cheered for their faux gusto.  Then the DFL Army makes them give a speech, because, as one of the DFL Army shouted from the back of the room, "We want to know a little bit about them, if they're going to represent us!"  That's great.  You don't volunteer, but then you grill the poor people who accepted the position out of guilt because people like you didn't pipe up.

Their speech?  "This is our name, we live in this part of St. Paul, and we just want to be involved."  Wild cheering erupts.  Yeah, except they didn't want to be involved, but whatever.  For reasons I don't understand, this speech satisfied the needs of the woman who demanded it, like, "Oh...they really do want to be involved?  Good enough for me!"

So then, the DFL Army suffers the ultimate indignity: Someone actually has the temerity to suggest that we elect delegates next, and then do the resolutions last, because that's what the fewest people will have interest in, because apparently, choosing delegates doesn't take too long, while the resolutions can go on for quite awhile. 

Gnashing of teeth!  Murmurs of disapproval! 

So they vote on which will come first.  Bear in mind, there are 102 people in the room, although some have left at this point because the balloting is done.  But I would say there are still at least 90 people in the room, and the only reason Linus and I are among them is because I want to hear the outcome of the vote.

The vote breaks down like this...

No, wait.  I should say the first vote is a voice vote.  The "Ayes" seem to me to be about even with the "Nays", but the people running the meeting, who are sensible people, want this motion to fail, so they say the Nays have it. 

Gnashing of teeth!  Murmurs of disapproval!  And then a motion from the Army: "I move we have an actual vote!"  A quick second from the Army followed, and many eyes were rolled around the room. 

So, the vote breaks down like this: 26 people want the resolutions to come first.  26 people want the delegate selection to come first.  Yes, that's right.  52 out of 90 or so people vote, and it's a freaking tie.  Then, after the vote, a couple people say, "Oh, but I didn't vote, and I think I really do want to hear those resolutions first!"  A member of the DFL Army then pipes up and says, "I move we have a second vote!", followed by a quick second.

Then, unbelievably, they start to have another vote!  Well, enough is enough.  I stand up and say, "Uh...you can't just have a second vote.  The motion was made, and it failed.  A tie is not a passed measure.  It's a failed measure.  Shall we move on to delegate selection?"  After I say this, there is murmuring from the crowd, among which I hear somebody say, "Well, he's got us."  Yo, I wasn't a Student Congress champ for nothing! 

Then they began delegate selection, but I know when I've had too much of a petty thing, so after sneaking a peak at the ballot envelope to get the results, Linus and I bailed.  For all I know, they were there till midnight.  They may still be there, having their motions and votes among all the confused middle school students trying to have their class, who are wondering to themselves, "This is Democracy?"

Yes, it is.  I guess.  I wanted to make a motion that we just have a primary instead.  Afterwards, I talked to Friend of Pipeline David B., who is an experienced hand at this level of politics.  He had warned me about what I would see there, and he was right.  In fairness, he says that in years where there are actual local races going on (there really aren't any this year), the caucus system can be valuable. 

But in general, David believes you couldn't design a more participation unfriendly system if you tried.  I concur.  There were so many people who showed up last night, who so clearly wanted to participate.  At some level, you have to dig into the detail.  But man, when you spend 80% of your time arguing about silly motions, and then denigrating all the newcomers because they don't want to commit four hours on a weeknight to hear your special pet platform, how can you expect that to bring in new members? 

Now I understand why the GOP does so well.  Hell, all they have to do is give their money.

Oh, and the results of our precinct vote? 

  • Kerry, 48
  • Edwards, 26
  • Kucinich, 19
  • Dean, 6
  • Clark, 1
  • Sharpton, 1
  • Uncommitted, 1
  • Joe Lieberman, 0

So, Kucinich and Dean combined for 25% of the vote tally.  Perfect.  "Dead Man Walking", indeed. 

Argumentative White Liberals.  God love us.


11:08:33 AM    Say what?[]

Ring In The Spring: New Unis

Each year brings a bushel of teams who want to change their image with a new logo or color scheme.  I haven't seen all the changes yet, but here are a few...

Baltimore has changed the Oriole just slightly on their caps, making it bigger and more lifelike.  Well, to be honest, that might be the same damn bird they had last year.  But the caps are different, at least.  There might be other uniform changes as well, since they spent big bucks to bring in new players so they can finish in fourth in the AL East.

San Diego is gearing up to move into their ballpark with a slightly new color scheme, going to more of a Notre Dame blue-gold combo.  The logo, at least, makes one think of the Brewers, always a great franchise to emulate.

I can't tell yet, but it looks to me like the Cardinals might have gone to a more retro style with their cap script.  Old-time teams like the Cards, Tigers, Yankees and Cubs are very conservative with changes to their appearance, but typically when they do it they do it right.  I have long thought the Cardinals had one of the best uniforms in the game, and am eager to see what they've done.

The only team that I have seen thus far to get a complete (and badly needed) makeover are the Toronto Blue Jays.  Check this logo out.  Sharp.

There are probably other uniform changes in the wings that just aren't obvious from the logos on ESPN. 


9:41:41 AM    Say what?[]

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 DH.
Last update: 4/1/2004; 2:21:15 PM.


March 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Feb   Apr

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Email The Pipeline



Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Subscribe to "Pipeline" in Radio UserLand.