Friday, March 12, 2004


Dirty Drawers

I have this file cabinet in my home office.  I got it when I was in grad school at Kansas State in 1992, and from that time until probably 1995, various pieces of paper found their way into the hanging files. 

In 1995, however, I avoided putting anything into the drawers because it was a mess.  I made a solemn declaration to my cats (I lived alone in 1995): "This file cabinet must be cleaned!  Nothing shall be further filed until said cleaning!"  My cats took note of this momentous occasion by sleeping and pooping on the floor outside their dirty litterbox.

Last night, nine years, a wife, two kids, a dog and one less cat later, I finally cleaned that damned file cabinet.

It was a virtual time machine, transporting me back to a peculiar period of my life that I had no urgent desire to relive.  Essentially covering three years, it starts with my failed attempt at grad school, followed by two years of living alone, missing friends, accumulating awkward letters from past girlfriends, and some seriously bad attempts at creative writing.

The grad school stuff was just appalling.  A re-reading of my papers, even the ones I got A's on, left me wondering just who was grading my work.  I've seen better writing in George Lucas script.  Just horrifically bad.  Man, I couldn't put that stuff in the recycling bin fast enough.  If my kids ever found that stuff, I'd be ashamed.  Yes, I could keep it as a motivational tool, to show them what happens when you don't go to class and half-ass everything at the last minute, but I've got ample other display material for that particular lesson.  I don't need to perpetuate the notion that I'm a great academic, but I do fancy myself a decent writer, and these papers which provide so much evidence to the contrary simply must go.  Out!

Then, there were all the letters.  Letters from past girlfriends, letters from friends.  The girlfriend stuff immediately went out.  I didn't even reread them.  I'm a very sentimental person and all, and I have a certain place in my heart for most of those women, but that doesn't mean I need to have a space in my file cabinet.  Truthfully speaking, it might have been different if any of the letters were in any way interesting or titillating, but most dealt with the minutae of lives lived 10 or more years ago, details I probably cared little about even at the time.  You know how you hear stories about kids who discover their parents' letters years after the fact, finding revelations about steamy love affairs and such?  Those letters don't exist for my kids to find.  Instead, they'd find these letters and be like, "Damn.  Dad dated some crazy women who liked to talk about their class schedule a lot."  I'll save my kids the trouble.  Out!

But there were a lot of other letters from friends, most of whom I'm still very close with today.  I wasn't sure what to do with those letters.  It's hard to read them, because at the time I missed these people a great deal, but at the same time, the friendships endured.  Those letters were a bit of a lifeline to me, but I'm probably the only one who would really understand that.  Do I keep them?  For what purpose?  It's not like someday my archives are going to be released, Harry Blackmun-style, only to reveal in-depth conversations with friends about the White Album.  Jane suggested that perhaps I should send the letters back to the people who wrote them, because they might get a kick out of it.  Yeah, maybe.  But then they've got the same problem I have now, what to do with those letters?  What's more, what if they were to retaliate and send me back some of the letters that I wrote to them?  That's the last thing I need, more bad writing from my past.  I'll probably keep the letters, read them once, and file for another ten years before reviewing the decision.  In!

The creative writing efforts were an abomination.  Actually, that's not true.  I found most of them to be rather funny, but because I know they weren't really good, that just made me more embarrassed than anything.  The most prominent items were a collection of stories that my friend Jim and wrote in college.  The protagonist for the stories was a man named John Cocktoastin, and the idea was that he was about the biggest asshole on Earth.  There's one, for example, where he goes to a chess tournament and gets his ass kicked by a bunch of kids, and he reacts very poorly to that.  The writing is raw, very funny in places, and largely offensive.  But hey, the guy was an asshole, right?  Jim and I wrote these pieces in tandem, and almost completely without preparation.  We would come up with a title, like, "John Cocktoastin vs. Godzilla", and then one of us would write for about 20 minutes.  Then, we would switch, review what the other had written, and try to figure out where to take it from there.  We'd each take about seven turns, and then end the story.  It was our first creative writing experience, and it was a hell of a lot of fun.  The stories became something of a mini-legend among Kansas high school debaters, who clamored for us to read the stories aloud during the time when we were teaching at debate camps.  A sad and funny image to me now, us holding court with these crude stories.  For some reason, we never took the writing to the next step and tried to do something that was better.  Still, I will keep these stories.  I surely hope to never read them or have them read by anyone again, but they represent a time that is important to me, when Jim and I discovered that we had a creative kinship and ability to floor ourselves with laughter, something that I expect will last for our lifetimes.  In!

Most of the other stuff went in the "Out!" pile.  Scoresheets from a game of Zonk! held about 10 years before.  Fantasy baseball and basketball nonsense.  Lots of bankstatements and such, from the days when nearly every one had an overdraw or some other mishap. 

I'm glad I was able to largely view the contents of these drawers as "The Past".

I decided to keep one thing to show my kids.  It's a rejection letter from the University of Minnesota Master's Program for Teaching.  I had applied in '94, and was rejected.  At the time, I had a lot of hope put into getting a letter that said something else, but that was the letter I received.  Really, it was the only letter I could have received.  I was rejected because my undergraduate and graduate academic record wasn't strong enough to merit consideration.  I want my kids to understand that their actions and efforts will have consequences, even if it is hard to foresee those consequences at the time.  There was a time when I wanted to be a teacher.  And I know I would have been a great teacher.  But it takes more than that, and I didn't have what it took, and by the time I realized that, it was too late to go get it.

But I also want them to see that letter because of a more important lesson it has to offer, and that is that when things happen that aren't a part of your plan, you just have to roll with it.  You find a new direction.  Before you know it, you're not thinking about that rejection letter anymore.  You're working a crappy temp job and freaking out because you don't have a real job, and then you're writing down a bunch of negative thoughts in a notebook and having trouble sleeping and...

Well, on second thought, maybe I'll skip the two years immediately after the letter, and just make sure they know that in the end, everything can work out if you stay with it and enjoy life and make some breaks for yourself along the way. 

I kept that letter initially because it meant something to me.  I'll keep it now because it doesn't mean anything at all.

Now, my files are clean and organized for the first time since 1992.  I would say that I can start on the inevitable task of accumulating all the detritus and miscellanea from the next 10 years of my life, but I'm concerned that the electronic age might mean that the next 10 years simply won't produce as much stuff to file.  What we don't need today goes in the virtual Recycle Bin in a much shorter cycle than my paper files have grown accustomed to.

Ah, well.  I don't plan on getting too many love notes or rejection letters in the next 10 years, anyway.  It's probably going to be a pretty boring file next time.


11:29:19 AM    Say what?[]

Peanut

My daughter is officially small.  She's in the 12th and 10th percentile, respectively, for height and weight for 9-month olds.  No wonder everybody else's babies look like behemoths next to her.

But, she's in the 28th percentile for head circumference.  I hope that evens out a bit as she gets older.


10:27:00 AM    Say what?[]

Spain's 9/11: What Impact On the U.S.?

In the immediate aftermath of yesterday's bombings in Madrid, the Spanish government initially blamed the Basque seperatist group ETA for the tragedy.  However, further investigation of the event shows conflicting evidence that either ETA or perhaps Islamic fundamentalists related to Al Qaeda could be involved.

The are ample reasons to suspect either group.  ETA-inspired plots that involved bombing trains were foiled in December, and there is a long history of ETA terrorism in Spain.  With national elections coming up, the time is ripe for such an event.  However, Al Qaeda has it's own score to settle with Spain, a member of the "Coalition of the Willing" in the U.S.'s invasion of Iraq, and the highly orchestrated nature of the bombings is an Al Qaeda hallmark.

The implications for the Bush Adminstration are interesting and numerous.  Obviously, the Bush Administration is highly dependent on the U.S. voting public having a healthy fear of terrorism; Bush ads released yesterday play on that fear by insinuating that John Kerry will be soft on terror. 

But Terror Fear is a tricky business to manage when your Administration has been in charge now for over three years, there are some sticky questions about your Administration's culpability in the last terror attack, and you're basing your re-election campaign on the notion that you can keep the country safe.

Does another attack on the U.S. help or hurt Bush at this point?  I would guess that an attack would help him substantially in the short term.  An attack promotes fear, and accurately or not, Bush is perceived as the candidate who is most willing to "get tough" with the terrorists.  While there would probably be ample room for discussion about whether the Administration was at fault in some way for having another attack on their watch, that kind of nuance can take a great deal of time to flesh out with even model cooperation from an Administration, and there is reason to suspect something less than that in any circumstance. 

The immediate and visceral reaction would be that we are still in danger, and now is not the time to go all soft and Democrat on terror.  I don't think it's an accurate characterization to say that the GOP has reduced terror, but I think that it's a message that will play to enough people that it would help Bush in an election.

But still, there is obviously a downside for the Administration involving any attack on U.S. soil.  For one thing, the Administration itself could be the target, which would be the Ultimate Downside.  For another, it's hard to say you're making the country safe when the only two attacks have happened on your watch.  It wouldn't stop them from saying it, but it's still a dicey proposition.  You just don't want that kind of black mark on your record.

The best way for Bush to capitalize on his best election asset, Terror Fear, is to have a way to point to the continued viability of the Al Qaeda terror machine, but not have to answer for any terrorism that may take place in the U.S.. 

Madrid gives Bush that opportunity. 

But will Americans buy it?  I'm not sure.  I believe that most of the people who are in the pool of undecided or swing voters probably understand that Al Qaeda is still a threat.  What's more, terror that happens somewhere else just doesn't historically have the same import as terror that happens here at home.  But the key is the word, "historically".  Has 9/11 changed our ideas about terror?  Has it made us more empathetic about struggles that other countries face now?  Will Americans see the coverage of those busted up Spanish trains and come to feel that pain as a part of their own identity, in the way that 9/11 transformed so many people in this country?

I don't know.  I'm willing to bet that the Bush Administration will have plenty to say about Madrid in the weeks and months to come, to make sure that people draw the connection as strongly as possible. 

Is there anything wrong with that?  Probably not, provided that the evidence of the connection is real.  Al Qaeda is out there, still, and it's important to understand how they operate and what they are willing to do.

But that's not what this election should be about.  Anybody who doesn't think Al Qaeda is out there hasn't been paying attention. 

The question should be, are we better or worse off in dealing with Al Qaeda with Bush or Kerry in the White House?  The secondary question is, has Bush's actions to date made the U.S. safer from Al Qaeda? 

What do those voters in the Great Middle think the answers to those questions are?That's hard to know at this time, though we should be watching the polls coming out in the next week or so for any spikes in Bush's numbers.

But, considering that Bin Laden said that Spain was a target because of their willingness to join with the U.S. in attacking Iraq, and considering the half-assed efforts the U.S. put into finding Bin Laden in the last two years, I have a feeling that Bush wouldn't get a whole lot of votes if he were running in Spain's next election.


10:24:46 AM    Say what?[]

Click here to visit the Radio UserLand website. © Copyright 2004 DH.
Last update: 4/1/2004; 2:21:18 PM.


March 2004
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Feb   Apr

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Email The Pipeline



Click to see the XML version of this web page.

Subscribe to "Pipeline" in Radio UserLand.