Catnmus, the Raving Independent
Wherein I curse madly on all sorts of topics, and probably talk about my cats, too, at some point.
Last updated:
10/1/2003; 7:40:34 PM


September 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Aug   Oct



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "Catnmus, the Raving Independent" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Catnmus:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Friday, September 12, 2003

Does management include intellectual stimulation or opportunities for innovation?

Also in the same Sept 6 Science News article, on materialism.  They started with a group of students in an MBA program.  They surveyed the students 4-9 years later, when they were making between $80k and $2m annually.  They reported that the students that were working "mainly for intellectual stimulation, opportunities for innovation, and other intrinsic values" had less satisfaction and were less happy, the more money they were paid.  However, the students who entered the business world for the purpose of making money felt happier the more money they were making.

Um, duh!  Who goes into management thinking that they're going to have "intellectual stimulation" and "opportunities for innovation"?  The people that were thinking that entered the wrong master's program to start with.  Of course their happiness and satisfaction is going to be less.  A more fair comparison would be to compare the "money-makers" with another business-but-non-monetary group - for example, the group that goes into management for the power of it.  I suppose then it would be hard to find a group of people that make a lot of money but don't have a lot of power, to compare with a group that has a lot of power but makes very little money.  Because usually the two go hand in hand, as you move up the management ladder. 


9:07:44 PM    Here's what I have to say about THAT! []

Is creativity influenced by cash?

Science News, September 6 issue.  There's an interesting article about consumerism/materialism.  One thing that I found very intriguing is a study with grade-schoolers.  They gave some students small amounts of money for thinking up creative uses for everyday objects.  They compared those students with other students that did the "creative uses" bit but didn't get paid, as well as those that didn't do the "creative uses" exercise at all.  The students that got paid for the exercise "generated more creative titles for movies and short stories" than the other two groups.

So, does this mean that books and movies that are written with the thought in mind ahead of time to sell them are generally more creative than those that are written just to please the author?


8:57:58 PM    Here's what I have to say about THAT! []



© Copyright 2003 Catnmus. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 10/1/2003; 7:40:34 PM.
Powered by