The Marprelate Tracts
Web-log for political, social and media commentary.
Last updated:
5/1/2003; 5:19:38 PM


April 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Mar   May



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "The Marprelate Tracts" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Martin Marprelate:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Saturday, April 26, 2003

Click here – it’s about 2004 and what the numbers tell us.


2:49:41 PM    

Read this chilling account of censorship live on morning TV.

 

And all this intimidation crap gets sanctioned at the very top.

 

Not that Dubya pulled the plug himself – just that he encourages the worst instincts in others when any true American would defend our political freedoms enshrined in constitution – both the letter and the spirit.

 


2:35:18 PM    

Thank goodness we have a “straight-shooter” in the white house who fesses up to the American people:

 

Officials inside government and advisers outside told ABCNEWS the administration emphasized the danger of Saddam's weapons to gain the legal justification for war from the United Nations and to stress the danger at home to Americans.

 

"We were not lying," said one official. "But it was just a matter of emphasis."

 

Officials now say they may not find hundreds of tons of mustard and nerve agents and maybe not thousands of liters of anthrax and other toxins. But U.S. forces will find some, they say. On Thursday, President Bush raised the possibility for the first time that any such Iraqi weapons were destroyed before or during the war.

 

If weapons of mass destruction were not the primary reason for war, what was?

 

So much for telling the truth - and this is not a simple matter of an illicit blowjob. (Of course they couldn't quite bring themselves to telling the truth about their lies... they only exaggerated.)

 

So when do the impeachment proceedings begin?

 

What about the rule of law??

 

What will we tell the children???

 

And, while we’re at it, what was the reason for the war?

 

Unbelievably the reporters go right back to the same people who just told that, basically, we lie to you (the press) and the American people to get what we want!

 

What is the answer from the lying dirt-bags this time?

 

They wanted a “perfect target” for a “show of force.”

 

Basically a US taxpayer funded commercial for Junior as a “determined man of action.”

 

The Bush administration wanted to make a statement about its determination to fight terrorism. And officials acknowledge that Saddam had all the requirements to make him, from their standpoint, the perfect target.

 

(The sources also confess that it didn’t hurt that Iraq is a “prime location” in the oil-rich Middle East.)

 

And why were they able to do orchestrate a war to boost Bush’s popularity? Because of 9/11 “changed everything.”

 

So a war, death, an occupation, the virtual destruction of the system of alliances that have helped keep America strong and respected, and the submarining of the war on terror, etc., etc. – why? – all so Junior could seem strong, determined and proactive.

 

This is corruption on a far grander scale than mere thievery or graft (the type most familiar from American history).

 

This corruption in the sense of the word when used by Thucydides or Machiavelli – the deliberate abuse of government resources though policies designed solely to further individual political careers. In other words corruption on such a scale involves the complete inversion of what government is all about – using public power to further the standing of a few private individuals.

 

Welcome to the reign of the “Mayberry Machiavellis.”

 

Also check out MWO’s commentary on this disgrace. You won’t be disappointed.


2:15:53 PM    

…from folks like you and me: get this.


1:37:26 PM    

Here’s a good one on Bush and the Dixie Chicks (don’t miss “thug radio” in the upper right) (Thanks to TBogg)

 

Here’s the ever-reliable Mark Fiore.

 

And a bitingly accurate one from Auth


1:07:41 PM    

“illegal immigrants can be jailed indefinitely”

 

Who truly believes this has anything to do with any “war on terrorism”?

 

This is just old-fashioned know-nothing nativism combined with a complete disregard for human rights and liberties as enshrined in the constitution.

 

Today the illegal immigrants… tomorrow citizens… except that is already true today – according to Ashcroft you can be detained indefinitely incommunicado even if you are a citizen as long as Ashcroft says you are a “terrorist” and hence an “enemy combatant.”

 

Of course all it may take to be labeled a “terrorist” is criticism of the current regime… and don’t think it can’t happen because it wouldn’t be the first time.


12:07:52 PM    

How else does one explain remarks like the following:

 

U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) has blasted President John F. Kennedy’s famous 1960 endorsement of church-state separation, saying that Kennedy’s vow not to take orders from the Roman Catholic hierarchy has caused "much harm in America."

 

Interviewed in Rome while attending an event sponsored by Opus Dei, a far-right Catholic group, Santorum told the National Catholic Reporter, "All of us have heard people say, ‘I privately am against abortion, homosexual marriage, stem cell research, cloning. But who am I to decide that it’s not right for someone else?’ But it is the corruption of freedom of conscience."

 

According to Santorum, Kennedy was not the nation’s first Catholic president. That distinction, he said, belongs to George W. Bush, a Methodist.

 

"From economic issues focusing on the poor and social justice, to issues of human life, George Bush is there," Santorum said. "He has every right to say, ‘I’m where you are if you’re a believing Catholic.’"

 

Wait… there is another explanation: Santorum is one of those bigoted “more Catholic than the Pope” types – literally, since he openly disobeys the Popes teaching on the death penalty, the Iraq war and worships at a church that refuses to recognized Vatican II. And yet he has the nerve to lecture other people on Catholicism.

 

I don’t mind people who prefer their Catholicism cafeteria style (a little of this, a little of that) but I do think it the ultimate in hypocrisy when they do so and then lecture others about their duty as Catholics.

 

Santorum is one of those who feels his Catholicism is “purer” than the Pope’s and so he feels free to instruct other Catholics on what they should believe as Catholics – including the bogus notion that Junior is also more Catholic than the Pope. After all Santorum’s a “believing Catholic” – whatever that is supposed to mean.

 

And does the “first Catholic [sic] president” endorse his acolyte?

 

The president has confidence in the senator [Santorum] and believes he's doing a good job as senator"

 

That should tell you all you need to know about the moral weathervane that is currently occupying the white house – whether you’re a “believing Catholic” or not.

 

(thanks to Slim)


11:47:10 AM    

…The latest scandal involves a wealthy, 49-year-old California woman and major Republican Party contributor who the FBI said in a court affidavit was a "double agent," working for two decades for the FBI while secretly reporting to Beijing.

 

-- Senate investigators in 1996 suspected Leung as being a conduit for secret Chinese government payments to the Republicans, but the committee, headed by former Tennessee Republican Sen. Fred Thompson, dropped the inquiry before a report could be written. "The money came out of Macao," said one former congressional investigator, and "was funneled through Taiwan."…

 

Leung's wealth and prominence were well-known in Los Angeles. She had received $1.7 million from the FBI. In 1995 and 1996, when she was making numerous political contributions, she was paid $1.2 million negotiating a deal that allowed Nortel Communications to do business in China.

 

Though her 1995 and 1996 contributions have not been detailed, the American Reporter reviewed campaign records that showed she has given thousands of dollars to Republican candidates including, indirectly through political action groups, to President George W. Bush's 2000 campaign.

 

More craziness… what’s next, we find out she used hre influence with the FBI to try to throw blame on Clinton and Gore for Chinese fundraising? Oops, she did that too!

 

Does all this make Dubya the Manchurian candidate?

 

If you recall the candidate in that film was an alcoholic, dim-witted right-wing know-nothing who would mouth any propaganda - no matter how hateful or divisive – that his handlers could fit on a cue card in order to secure electoral “success”… I report - you decide.


11:26:25 AM    

If I were writing fiction this stuff would be rejected as patently unbelievable.

 

Republican activist Richard A. Delgaudio, a longtime Northern Virginia-based fundraiser for conservative causes and personalities, was sentenced to two years' probation yesterday after pleading guilty to a child pornography charge.

 

But as we know from Rick Santorum there is essentially no difference between a consensual blow-job in the oval office and child pornography – it all deviates from the divinely mandated missionary position…


11:05:20 AM    

Click on this link for a goodly dose of irony… not to mention kitsch.

 

Now you probably realize that I don’t think much of the current resident… but who would have thought his taste in “art” was so Hitler-ian?

 

(Is that even a word? Well if it isn’t it should be just to describe this bizarre result of the interactions between George W. Bush and a former gay porn star.)

 

You have to see it to believe it.

 

(Thanks to Atrios)


10:53:06 AM    



© Copyright 2003 Martin Marprelate. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 5/1/2003; 5:19:38 PM.
Powered by