The Marprelate Tracts
Web-log for political, social and media commentary.
Last updated:
11/1/2003; 12:13:24 PM


October 2003
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Sep   Nov



Subscribe to this blog in Radio:
Subscribe to "The Marprelate Tracts" in Radio UserLand.

Click to see the XML version of this web page.

E-mail this blog's author, Martin Marprelate:
Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
 

Wednesday, October 29, 2003

"You recently put Condoleezza Rice, your national security adviser, in charge of the management of the administration's Iraq policy. What has effectively changed since she's been in charge?


And a second question: Can you promise a year from now that you will have reduced the number of troops in Iraq?"


BUSH: "The second question is a trick question, so I won't answer it."

 

Remember that answer next time you're in a jam:

"Honey, did you put this charge for golf clubs on the credit card?"

"That's a trick question, so I won't answer it."

Or... "Darling, someone left a case of empty beer cans scattered in the basement, did you forget to clean up after the game?"

"That's a trick question, so I won't answer it."

And for you youngsters out there:

"Who left this toy in the middle of the floor, where I could trip on it?"

"That's a trick question, so I won't answer it."

And the best thing is, the answer is not "clintonesque"... because there is no answer! Imagine all the trouble Clinton would have avoided if instead of trying to clarify exactly what big-bucks lawyers were trying to trap him into saying (depends on what the meaning of "is" is) he had just said:

"That's a trick question, so I won't answer it."

And when those aggressive, elbows-first media folks (what ever happened to them?) were asking ...

"Mr. President, did you have sex with Lewinski?"

"That's a trick question, so I won't answer it."

But then, I guess the stakes weren't so high for Clinton, otherwise I'm sure he would have come up with this ingenious dodge. After all, no one actually died and democracy was not subverted Clinton's consensual affair, was it?

You know the wingnut answer to that: "That's a trick question, so I won't answer it."


7:12:02 PM    

In a blistering review of President Bush's national security policy, Gen. Wesley K. Clark said on Tuesday that the administration could not "walk away from its responsibilities for 9/11."


"You can't blame something like this on lower-level intelligence officers, however badly they communicated in memos with each other," said the retired general, the latest entrant in the Democratic presidential field. "It goes back to what our great president Harry Truman said with the sign on his desk: `The buck stops here.' And it sure is clear to me that when it comes to our nation's national security, the buck rests with the commander in chief, right on George W. Bush's desk."


"And," he added, "we've got to say again and again and again, until the American people understand: strong rhetoric in the aftermath is no substitute for wise leadership."


7:06:09 PM    



© Copyright 2003 Martin Marprelate. Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.
Last update: 11/1/2003; 12:13:24 PM.
Powered by